We propose a novel approach to analyze interfuel substitution that explicitly incorporates heterogenous fuel-using capital stocks in the estimation of the optimal fuel choice. Our econometric framework structurally estimates the frictionless level of fuel-using capital stocks and employs non-parametric analysis to reveal information on the form of adjustment costs facing firms. To illustrate this approach we use a large panel of Irish manufacturing firms over the period 2004-2009. The econometric estimates show a large variation in the optimal response of capital to changing fuel prices across different fuel-using technologies and imply substantial costs to capital adjustment. These results underscore the significance of the frequently ignored link between capital adjustment and the choice of fuels used by manufacturing firms.
AcemogluD.AghionP.BursztynL.HemousD. (2012). “The Environment and Directed Technical Change” American Economic Review102(1): 131-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131.
2.
AltonjiJ. G.ElderT. E.TaberC. R. (2005). “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic schools” Journal of Political Economy113(1): 151-184. https://doi.org/10.1086/426036.
3.
AndrewBAbelJ. C. E. (1994). “A Unified Model of Investment Under Uncertainty” The American Economic Review 84(5): 1369-1384 ISSN 00028282.
4.
AngB.ChoiK.-H. (1997). “Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method” The Energy Journal : 59-73. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol18-No3-3.
5.
AngB.XuX.SuB. (2015). “Multi-country Comparisons of Energy Performance: The Index Decomposition Analysis Approach” Energy Economics47: 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.011.
6.
AtkesonA.KehoeP. J. (1999). “Models of Energy Use: Putty-Putty versus Putty-Clay” American Economic Review 89(4): 1028-1043 doi:10.1257/aer.89.4.1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.1028.
7.
BardazziR.OropalloF.PazienzaM. G. (2015). “Do manufacturing firms react to energy prices? Evidence from Italy” Energy Economics49: 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.014.
8.
BjørnerT B.JensenH. H. (2002). “Interfuel substitution within industrial companies: An analysis based on panel data at company level” The Energy Journal23(2): 27-50. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No2-1.
9.
BrännlundR.LundgrenT. (2004). “A Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution for Swedish Heating Plants” Energy Economics26(6): 961-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.09.001.
10.
BurniauxJ.TruongT. (2002). “GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model” GTAP Technical Paper 16 Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
11.
BurniauxJ.-M.ChâteauJ. (2008). “An Overview of the OECD ENV-Linkages Model” OECD Economics Department Working Paper 653 OECD Publishing.
12.
BurnsideC.EichenbaumM.RebeloS. (1995). “Capital Utilization and Returns to Scale” NBER Macroeconomics Annual10: 67-110. https://doi.org/10.1086/654266.
13.
CaballeroR. J. (1999). “Aggregate Investment” Handbook of Macroeconomics1: 813-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10020-X.
14.
CaballeroR. J.EngelE. (2003). “Adjustment Is Much Slower than You Think” Technical report National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
CaballeroR. J.EngelE. M. (1999). “Explaining Investment Dynamics in US Manufacturing: A Generalized (S, s) Approach” Econometrica67(4): 783-826. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00053.
16.
ChoW. G.NamK.PaganJ. A. (2004). “Economic growth and interfactor/interfuel substitution in Korea” Energy Economics26(1): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2003.04.001.
17.
CurtinJ. (2012). “Decarbonising Energy End Use -Background Paper No.6” Technical report National Economic and Social Council (NESC).
18.
DixitA. K.PindyckR. S. (1994). Investment Under Uncertainty Princeton University Press.
19.
DomsM. E. (1993). Inter fuel substitution and energy technology heterogeneity in US Manufacturing 5 Bureau of the Census.
20.
ESRI (2012). www.esri.ie/irish_economy/databank, accessed on 16.01.2013.
21.
FussM. A. (1977). “The demand for energy in Canadian manufacturing: An example of the estimation of production structures with many inputs” Journal of Econometrics 5(1): 89-116 ISSN 0304-4076. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90036-7.
22.
GallachóirB.P.Ó.ChiodiA.GargiuloM.DeaneP.LavigneD.RoutU.K. (2012). “Irish TIMES Energy Systems Model” .
23.
GoolsbeeA.GrossD. B. (2000). “Estimating the form of adjustment costswith data on heterogeneous capital goods” Mimeograph, University of Chicago .
24.
GrilichesZ. (1974). “Errors in Variables and Other Unobservables” Econometrica42(6): 971-998. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914213.
25.
GrilichesZ.HausmanJ. A. (1986). “Errors in Variables in Panel Data” Journal of Econometrics31(1): 93-118. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90058-8.
26.
HallV. B. (1986). “Major OECD country industrial sector interfuel substitution estimates, 1960-1979” Energy Economics 8(2): 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(86)90032-0.
27.
HallerS. A. (2014). “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Foreign Presence and Import Competition in Irish Services Sectors?” The World Economy37(2): 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12120.
28.
HallerS. A.HylandM. (2014). “Capital-energy substitution: Evidence from a panel of Irish manufacturing firms” Energy Economics 45: 501-510 ISSN 0140-9883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.003.
29.
HylandM.HallerS. A. (2018). “Firm-Level Estimates of Fuel Substitution: An Application to Carbon Pricing” The Energy Journal 39(6). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.6.mhyl.
30.
JacobyH. D.Sue WingI. (1999). “Adjustment Time, Capital Malleability and Policy Cost” The Energy Journal 20(S): 73-92. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol20-NoSI-4.
31.
JonesC. T. (1995). “A Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution in U.S. Industrial Energy Demand” Journal of Business &Economic Statistics 13(4): 459-465 ISSN07350015. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392391.
32.
JorgensonD. (1967). “The theory of investment behavior” in “Determinants of investment behavior,” NBER 129-175.
33.
MackenzieM.TieuA. K. (2004). “Asymmetric Kernel Regression” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks15(2): 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2004.824414.
34.
O’ReillyL.NolanB. (1979). “The Measurement of Capacity Utilisation in Irish Manufacturing Industry” Economic and Social Review11(1): 47-65.
35.
PaltsevS.ReillyJ. M.JacobyH. D.EckausR. S.McFarlandJ. R.SarofimM. C.AsadoorianM. O.BabikerM. H. (2005). “The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4” Technical report MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
36.
PapageorgiouC.SaamM.SchulteP. (2017). “Substitution Between Clean and Dirty Energy Inputs-A Macroeconomic Perspective” Review of Economics and Statistics99(2): 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00592.
37.
PindyckR. S. (1979). “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison” The Review of Economics and Statistics61(2): 169-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924584.
RuaneF.SutherlandJ. (2005). “Export Performance and Destination Characteristics of Irish Manufacturing Industry” Review of World Economics141(3): 442-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-005-0038-4.
40.
SerletisA.ShahmoradiA. (2008). “Semi-nonparametric estimates of interfuel substitution in US energy demand” Energy Economics30(5): 2123-2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.09.002.
41.
SerletisA.TimilsinaG. R.VasetskyO. (2010). “Interfuel substitution in the United States” Energy Economics32(3): 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.013.
42.
SteinbuksJ. (2012). “Interfuel Substitution and Energy Use in the UK Manufacturing Sector” The Energy Journal33(1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-1.
43.
SteinbuksJ.NeuhoffK. (2014). “Assessing Energy Price Induced Improvements in Efficiency of Capital in OECD Manufacturing Industries” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management68(2): 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.003.
44.
SternD. I. (2012). “Interfuel Substitution: A Meta-Analysis” Journal of Economic Surveys26(2): 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00646.x.
45.
SuB.AngB. (2012). “Structural Decomposition Analysis Applied to Energy and Emissions: Some Methodological Developments” Energy Economics34(1): 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009.
46.
UrgaG.WaltersC. (2003). “Dynamic Translog and Linear Logit Models: A Factor Demand Analysis of Interfuel Substitution in US Industrial Energy Demand” Energy Economics25(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00022-1.
47.
WingI. S. (2008). “Explaining the Declining Energy Intensity of the US Economy” Resource and Energy Economics30(1): 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.03.001.
48.
ŽnuderlN.KearneyI. (2013). “User Cost of Debt-Financed Capital in Irish Manufacturing Industry: 1985 -2011” ESRI Working Paper No. 448.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
