This paper analyses the effect of recognizing co-firing coal with biomass as renewable electricity. We provide simulations for the French and German electricity mix. Results indicate that, if co-firing is recognized as a renewable, coal may crowd-out traditional renewables with increased generation and additional investments. Regarding CO2 emissions, we find surges when co-firing is recognized as a renewable. The rise is more significant in Germany due to greater coal capacity. In France, the magnitude depends on the share of nuclear with a lower increase when old nuclear plants are prolonged. Finally, we find that recognizing co-firing as a renewable reduces the overall costs for electricity. We balance the cost saving with the increased social cost from higher CO2 emissions. Results show that the cost saving is lower than the increased carbon cost for society with carbon valuation around 100 Euros/tCO2, except in France when old nuclear plants are not decommissioned.
AlexanderP.MoranD.RounsevellM.D.A.SmithP. (2013). “Modelling the perennial energy crop market: the role of spatial diffusion.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface10(88). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0656.
AURES-Ecofys (2016). Auctions for Renewable Energy Support in the Netherlands: Instruments and lessons learnt.
4.
BerggrenM.LjunggrenE.JohnssonF. (2008). “Biomass co-firing potentials for electricity generation in Poland - Matching supply and co-firing opportunities.” Biomass and Bioenergy32(9): 865-879. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.biom-bioe.2007.12.017.
5.
BertrandV.DequiedtB.LeE. Cadre (2014). “Biomass for Electricity in the EU-27: Potential Demand, CO2 Abatements and Breakeven Prices for Co-firing.” Energy Policy73: 631-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.007.
6.
BertrandV.LeE. Cadre (2015). “Simulating the use of biomass in electricity with the Green Electricty Simulate model: An application to the French power generation.” CEC Working Paper, 2015-3.
7.
BubholzM.NowakowskiR. (2010). Mapping of subsidy systems and future consumption of biomass. Svensk Fjärrvärme, Technical Report.
8.
BMWi (2015). The Energy of the Future - Fourth Energy Transition Monitoring Report. BMWi (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy), Technical Report.
9.
CalvinK.EdmondsJ.Bond-LambertyB.ClarkeL.KimS.H.KyleP.SmithS.J.ThomsonA.WiseM. (2009). “Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century.” Energy Economics31(Supplement 2): S107-S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.006.
10.
CGDD (2016). Les energies renouvelables en France en 2015. CGDD (Commissariat General au Développement Durable), French Ministry of Environment and Energy, Technical Report.
11.
ClarkeL.EdmondsJ.KreyV.RichelsR.RoseS.TavoniM. (2009). “International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International scenarios.” Energy Economics31(Supplement 2): S64-S81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.003.
12.
DelarueE.D.EllermanA.D.D’haeseleerW.D. (2010). “Short-term CO2 abatement in the European power sector: 2005-2006.” Climate Change Economics1(2): 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007810000108.
13.
De PerthuisC.SolierB. (2018). La transition énergétique face au tempo de l’horloge climatique. CEC, Information &Debats n끖.
14.
Entsoe (2016). Yearly statistics and adequacy Retrospect 2015.
15.
Eurelectric (2011). Power Statistics and Trends 2011.
16.
HanssonJ.BerndesG.JohnssonF.KjärstadJ. (2009). “Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation - An assessment of the potential in EU27.” Energy Policy37(4): 1444-1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.007.
17.
IEA (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012.
18.
JakobM.LudererG.SteckelJ.TavoniM.MonjonS. (2012). “Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action.” Climatic Change114: 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0128-3.
19.
KannanR.TurtonH. (2013). “A Long-Term Electricity Dispatch Model with the TIMES Framework.” Environmental Modeling and Assessment28(3): 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9346-y.
20.
LindenM.MaëkeläM.UusivuoriJ. (2013). “Fuel Input Substitution under Tradable Carbon Permits System: Evidence from Finnish Energy Plants 2005-2008.” The Energy Journal34(2): 145-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.2.5.
21.
LintunenJ.KangasH.L. (2010). “The case of co-firing: The market level effects of subsidizing biomass co-combustion.” Energy Economics32(3): 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.11.004.
22.
LudererG.BosettiV.JakobM.LeimbachM.SteckelJ.WaismanH.EdenhoferO. (2012). “The economics of decarbonizing the energy system-results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison.” Climatic Change114: 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0105-x.
23.
LudererG.BertramC.CalvinK.De CianE.KrieglerE. (2016). “Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways.” Climatic Change136: 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9.
24.
MeiB.WetzsteinM. (2017). “Burning wood pellets for US electricity generation? A regime switching analysis.” Energy Economics65: 434-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.025.
25.
Netherlands Enterprise Agency (2016). SDE+ 2016-Instructions on how to apply for a subsidy for the production of renewable energy.
26.
NordhausW.D. (2017). “Revisiting the social cost of carbon.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114(7): 1518-1523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114.
27.
RentizelasA.A.TolisA.I.TatsiopoulosI.P. (2012). “Investment planning in electricity production under CO2 price uncertainty.” International Journal of Production Economics140(2): 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.002.
28.
RTE (2011). Statistiques Production Consommation Échanges 2011. Réseau de Transport d’Électricité (RTE).
29.
SandsR.D.SchumacherK.FörsterH. (2014). “U.S. CO2 Mitigation in a Global Context: Welfare, Trade and Land Use.” The Energy Journal35(SI1): 181-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.SI1.10.
30.
SantisirisomboonJ.LimmeechokchaiB.ChungpaibulpatanaS. (2001). “Impacts of biomass power generation and CO2 taxation on electricity generation expansion planning and environmental emissions.” Energy Policy29(12): 975-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00028-3.
31.
SolierB. (2014). “An economic and ex post analysis of the impacts of the carbon price on the European power sector.” PhD thesis, Paris-Dauphine University.
32.
StraussW. (2017). Trump Wants to Save the Coal Industry. We Offer a Plan that can Help. FutureMetrics.
33.
WeigtH.EllermanA.D.DelarueE. (2013). “CO2 abatement from renewables in the German electricity sector: Does a CO2 price help?” Energy Economics40(1): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.013.
34.
XianH.ColsonG.MeiB.WetzsteinM.E. (2015). “Co-firing coal with wood pellets for U.S. electricity generation: a real options analysis.” Energy Policy81: 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.026.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
