The aim of this research is to understand the impact of preference heterogeneity in explaining energy consumption in French homes. Using a discrete-continuous model and the conditional mixed-process estimator (CMP) enable us to address two potential endogeneities in residential energy consumption: energy prices and the choice of home energy characteristics. As a key contribution, we provide evidence that a preference for comfort over saving energy does have significant direct and indirect impacts on energy consumption (through the choice of dwelling), particularly for high-income households. Preferring comfort over economy or one additional degree of heating implies an average energy overconsumption of 10% and 7.8% respectively, up to 18% for high-income households. Our results strengthen the belief that household heterogeneity is an important factor in explaining energy consumption and could have meaningful implications for the design of public policy tools aimed at reducing energy consumption in the residential sector.
AydinE.KokN.BrounenD. (2017). “Energy efficiency and household behavior: the rebound effect in the residential sector.” RAND J. Economics.48: 749-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12190.
2.
AlberiniA.GansW.ToweC. (2016). “Free Riding, Upsizing, and Energy Efficiency Incentives in Maryland Homes.” The Energy Journal.37(1): 259-290. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.L.AALB.
3.
AlberiniA.GansW.Velez-LopezD. (2011). “Residential consumption of gas and electricity in the U.S.: The role of prices and income.” Energy Economics33(5): 870-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.015.
4.
AllibeB. (2012). “Modelisation des consommations d’énergie du secteur résidentiel français à long terme—Amélioration du réalisme comportemental et scénarios volontaristes.”
5.
ArrowK.J.FisherA.C. (1974). “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics88(2): 312-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883074.
6.
BakerP.BlundellR.MicklewrightJ. (1989). “Modelling Household Energy Expenditures Using Micro-Data.” The Economic Journal99(397): 720-738. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233767.
7.
BelaïdF. (2016). “Understanding the spectrum of domestic energy consumption: Empirical evidence from France.” Energy Policy92: 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.015.
8.
BelaïdF. (2017). “Untangling the complexity of the direct and indirect determinants of the residential energy consumption in France: Quantitative analysis using a structural equation modeling approach.” Energy Policy110(Supplement C): 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.027.
9.
BelaïdF.GarciaT. (2016). “Understanding the spectrum of residential energy-saving behaviours: French evidence using disaggregated data.” Energy Economics57: 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.006.
10.
BrounenD.KokN. (2011). “On the economics of energy labels in the housing market.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management62(2): 166-179.
11.
BrounenD. N.QuigleyJ.M. (2013). “Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households.” Energy Economics38(0): 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.006.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008.
12.
CameronC.A.TrivadiP.K. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata. Stata Press, Revisited Version
13.
CarrollJ.LyonsS.DennyE.. (2014). “Reducing Household Electricity Demand through Smart Metering: The Role of Improved Information about Energy Saving.” Energy Economics45: 234—243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.007.
14.
CaylaJ.-M.MaiziN.MarchandC. (2011). “The role of income in energy consumption behaviour: Evidence from French households data.” Energy Policy39(12): 7874-7883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.036.
15.
CharlierD. (2015). “Energy efficiency investments in the context of split incentives among French households.” Energy Policy87: 465-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.005.
Di CosmoV.LyonsS.NolanA.(2014). “Estimating the Impact of Time-of-Use Pricing on Irish Electricity Demand.” The Energy Journal35(2): 117-136. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.2.6.
18.
DubinJ.A.McFaddenD.L. (1984). “An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption.” Econometrica52(2): 345-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911493.
19.
Ehrhardt-MartinezK.DonnellyK.A.LaitnerJ.A. (2010). Advanced Metering Initiatives and Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Report No. E105.
20.
EstiriH. (2015). “The indirect role of households in shaping US residential energy demand patterns.” Energy Policy86: 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.008.
21.
EwingR.RongF. (2008). “The impact of urban form on U.S. residential energy use.” Housing Policy Debate19(1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624.
22.
FaruquiA.SergiciS.SharifA. (2010). “The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—A survey of the experimental evidence.” Energy35(4): 1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.042.
23.
FrondelS.FloresF.M.VanceC. (2016). Title. RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
24.
GalvinR.Sunikka-BlankM. (2013). “Economic viability in thermal retrofit policies: Learning from ten years of experience in Germany.” Energy Policy54: 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.044.
25.
GalvinR.Sunikka-BlankM. (2014). “Disaggregating the causes of falling consumption of domestic heating energy in Germany.” Energy Efficiency7(5): 851-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9259-5.
26.
GrimesA.PrevalN.YoungC.ArnoldR.DenneT.Howden-ChapmanP.Telfar-BarnardL. (2016). “Does Retrofitted Insulation Reduce Household Energy Use? Theory and Practice.” The Energy Journal37(4): 165-186. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.4.agri.
27.
HacheE.LeboullengerD.MignonV. (2017). “Beyond average energy consumption in the French residential housing market: A household classification approach.” Energy Policy107: 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.038.
28.
HamiltonI.G.SteadmanP.J.BruhnsH.SummerfieldA.J.LoweR. (2013). “Energy efficiency in the British housing stock: Energy demand and the Homes Energy Efficiency Database.” Energy Policy60(0): 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.004.
29.
JessoeK.RapsonD. (2014). “Knowledge is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use.” American Economic Review104(4): 1417-1438. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1417.
30.
JonesR.V.FuertesA.LomasK.J. (2015). “The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews43: 901-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.084.
31.
KriströmB. (2006). Household Behaviour and the Environment Reviewing the Evidence. https://www.oecd.org/environ-ment/consumption-innovation/42183878.pdf.
32.
LabandeiraX.LabeagaJ.M.López-OteroX. (2017). “A meta-analysis on the price elasticity of energy demand.” Energy Policy102: 549-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.002.
33.
LabandeiraX.LabeagaJ.M.RodriguezM. (2006). “A residential energy demand system for Spain (English).” The Energy Journal27(2): 87-111. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No2-6.
34.
LeahyE.LyonsS. (2010). “Energy use and appliance ownership in Ireland.” Energy Policy38(8): 4265-4279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.056.
35.
LindenbergS.StegL. (2007). “Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues63(1): 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x.
36.
LopesM.A.R.AntunesC.H.MartinsN. (2012). “Energy behaviours as promoters of energy efficiency: A 21st century review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews16(6): 4095-4104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.034.
37.
MansurE.T.MendelsohnR.MorrisonW. (2008). “Climate change adaptation: A study of fuel choice and consumption in the US energy sector.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management55(2): 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.10.001.
38.
MartinaitisV.ZavadskasE.K.MotuzieneV.VilutieneT. (2015). “Importance of occupancy information when simulating energy demand of energy efficient house: A case study.” Energy and Buildings101: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.031.
39.
MatsukawaI. (2004). “The Effects of Information on Residential Demand for Electricity.” The Energy Journal25(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VOL25-NO1-2.NADEL.
40.
MeierH.JamasbT.OreaL. (2013). “Necessity or Luxury Good? Household Energy Spending and Income in Britain 1991-2007.” The Energy Journal34(4): 109-128. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.4.6.
41.
NesbakkenR. (1999). “Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in Norway.” Energy Economics21(6): 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00022-5.
42.
NesbakkenR. (2001). “Energy Consumption for Space Heating: A Discrete-Continuous Approach.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics103(1): 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00236.
43.
PonS. (2017). “The Effect of Information on TOU Electricity Use: An Irish Residential Study.” The Energy Journal38(6): 55-79. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.6.spon.
44.
RischA.SalmonC. (2017). “What matters in residential energy consumption: evidence from France.” International Journal of Global Energy Issues40(1-2): 79-115. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2017.080767.
45.
RobertR.W. (2015). “On the Practice of Lagging Variables to Avoid Simultaneity.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics77(6): 897-905. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12088.
46.
RoodmanD. (2011). “Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp.” The Stata Journal2(11): 159-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100202.
47.
SantamourisM.KapsisK.KorresD.LivadaI.PavlouC.AssimakopoulosM.N. (2007). “On the relation between the energy and social characteristics of the residential sector.” Energy and Buildings39(8): 893-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.11.001.
48.
SantinO.-G. (2011). “Behavioural patterns and user profiles related to energy consumption for heating.” Energy and Buildings43: 2262-2672.
49.
SchulteI.HeindlP. (2017). “Price and income elasticities of residential energy demand in Germany.” Energy Policy102(Supplement C): 512-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.055.
50.
SchulteI.HeindlP. (2017). “Price and income elasticities of residential energy demand in Germany.” Energy Policy102: 512-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.055.
51.
SOFRES-ADEME (2009). “Maîtrise de l’énergie—Attitudes et comportements des particuliers.” Note de synthèse.
52.
SorrellS. (2009). “Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency.” Energy Policy37(4): 1456-1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003.
53.
StolyarovaE.Cadre LeH.OssoD.AllibeB.MaïziN. (2015). “Residential Space Heating Determinants and Supply-Side Restrictions: Discrete Choice Approach.”
54.
VaageK. (2000). “Heating technology and energy use: a discrete/continuous choice approach to Norwegian household.” Energy Economics22(6): 649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00053-0.
55.
WolakF.A. (2011). “Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment.” American Economic Review101(3): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.83.
56.
YohanisY.G. (2012). “Domestic energy use and householders’ energy behaviour.” Energy Policy41(0): 654-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.028.
57.
YunG.Y.SteemersK. (2011). “Behavioural, physical and socio-economic factors in household cooling energy consumption.” Applied Energy88(6): 2191-2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.010.
58.
ZellnerA. (1962). “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association57(298): 348-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664.
59.
ZivinJ.G.NeidellM. (2013). “Environment, Health, and Human Capital.” Journal of Economic Literature51(3): 689-730. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.689.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
