We analyze the price responsiveness of U.S. conventional and unconventional oil supply across three key stages of oil production: drilling, completion, and production. Drilling is the most important margin, with price elasticities of 1.3 and 1.6 for conventional and unconventional drilling respectively. Well productivity declines as prices rise, implying smaller net supply elasticities of about 1.1 and 1.2. Despite similar supply elasticities, the price response of unconventional supply is larger in terms of barrels because of much higher production per well (∼10x initially). Oil supply simulations show a 13-fold larger supply response due to the shale revolution. The simulations suggest that a price rise from $50 to $80 per barrel induces incremental U.S. production of 0.6MM barrels per day in 6 months, 1.4MM in 1 year, 2.4MM in 2 years, and 4.2MM in 5 years. Nonetheless, the response takes much longer than the 30 to 90 days than typically associated with the role of “swing producer.”
AgertonMark (2018). “Learning Where to Drill: Drilling Decisions and Geological Quality in the Haynesville Shale.” Job market paper
2.
AndersonSoren T.KelloggRyanSalantStephen W. (2018). “Hotelling under Pressure.” Journal of Political Economy126(3): 984-1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/697203.
3.
BaumeisterChristianeHamiltonJames D. (2015). “Structural interpretation of vector autoregressions with incomplete identification: Revisiting the role of oil supply and demand shocks.” Manuscript, University of Notre Dame and UCSD.
4.
BaumeisterChristianeKilianLutz (2012). “Real-Time Forecasts of the Real Price of Oil.” Journal of Business &Economic Statistics30(2): 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2011.648859.
5.
BaumeisterChristianeKilianLutz (2016). “A General Approach to Recovering Market Expectations from Futures Prices with an Application to Crude Oil.” manuscript.
6.
BaumeisterChristianeKilianLutz (2016a). “Forty Years of Oil Price Fluctuations: Why the Price of Oil May Still Surprise Us.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives30(1): 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.139.
7.
BrownJason PManiloffPeterManningDale T (2018). “Effects of State Taxation on Investment: Evidence from the Oil Industry.” Working Paper.
8.
CoglianeseJohnDavisLucas WKilianLutzStockJames H (2017). “Anticipation, Tax Avoidance, and the Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand.” Journal of Applied Econometrics32(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2500.
9.
CollinsGabrielMedlockKenneth B. (2017). “Assessing Shale Producers’ Ability to Scale-up Activity.” Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Houston, Texas Issue brief no. 01.17.17.
10.
CovertThomas (2015). “Experiential and Social Learning in Firms: The Case of Hydraulic Fracturing in the Bakken Shale.” Available at SSRN 2481321. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2481321.
11.
DahlCarolYücelMine (1991). “Testing alternative hypotheses of oil producer behavior.” The Energy Journal12(4): 117-138. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol12-No4-8.
12.
DavisLucas W.KilianLutz (2011). “Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics26(7): 1187-1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1156.
13.
GriffinJames M. (1985). “OPEC behavior: a test of alternative hypotheses.” American Economic Review954-963.
14.
GüntnerJochen H.F.(2014). “How do oil producers respond to oil demand shocks?” Energy Economics44: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.012.
15.
HamiltonJames D. (2009). “Understanding Crude Oil Prices.” The Energy Journal30(2): 179-206. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No2-9.
16.
HausmanCatherineKelloggRyan (2015). “Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 21115. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21115.
17.
HoganWilliam W. (1989). World oil price projections: a sensitivity analysis. Harvard University, Energy and Environmental Policy Center, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
18.
JonesClifton T. (1990). “OPEC behaviour under falling prices: implications for cartel stability.” The Energy Journal11(3): 117-129. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol11-No3-6.
19.
JoskowPaul L. (2013). “Natural Gas: From Shortages to Abundance in the United States.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings103(3): 338-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.338.
20.
KahleDavidWickhamHadley (2013). “ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2.” The R Journal5(1): 144-161.
21.
KelloggRyan (2011). “Learning by drilling: Interfirm learning and relationship persistence in the Texas oilpatch.” Quarterly Journal of Economics126(4): 1961-2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr039.
22.
KelloggRyan (2014). “The effect of uncertainty on investment: evidence from Texas Oil Drilling.” American Economic Review104(6): 1698-1734. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.6.1698.
23.
KilianLutz (2009). “Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market.” American Economic Review99(3): 1053-69. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1053.
24.
KilianLutz (2016). “The Impact of the Shale Oil Revolution on U.S. Oil and Gasoline Prices.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy10(2): 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew001.
25.
KilianLutz (2017). “How the Tight Oil Boom Has Changed Oil and Gasoline Markets.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11876.
26.
MasonCharles F.RobertsGavin (2018). “Price Elasticity of Supply and Productivity: An Analysis of Natural Gas Wells in Wyoming.” The Energy Journal39(SI1): 79-100. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.SI1.cmas.
27.
MetcalfGilbert (2018). “The Impact of Removing Tax Preferences for U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Production: Measuring Tax Subsidies by an Equivalent Price Impact Approach.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists0(ja): null.
28.
NewellRichard G.PrestBrian C.VissingAshley (2019). “Trophy Hunting vs. Manufacturing Energy: The Price-Responsiveness of Shale Gas.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists6(2): 177-217.
29.
PrestBrian C. (2018). “Explanations for the 2014 oil price decline: Supply or demand?” Energy Economics74: 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.029.
30.
RamcharranHarri (2002). “Oil production responses to price changes: an empirical application of the competitive model to OPEC and non-OPEC countries.” Energy Economics24(2): 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00091-3.
31.
RaoNirupama (2013). “Taxes and the Extraction of Exhaustible Resources: Evidence from California Oil Production.” NYU Wagner Research Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2211681.
32.
SmithJames L. (2018a). “Estimating the future supply of shale oil: A Bakken case study.” Energy Economics69: 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.026.
33.
SmithJames L. (2018b). “How and Why Petroleum Leases Are Held by Production: Analysis of a Compound Option.” Land Economics94(1): 52-72. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.1.52.
34.
SmithJames L.LeeThomas K. (2017). “The price elasticity of U.S. shale oil reserves.” Energy Economics67: 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.021.
35.
SteckAndrew (2018). “Industry Dynamics with Social Learning: Evidence from Hydraulic Fracturing.” Working Paper.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
