Over the past decade the primary U.S. crude benchmark, WTI, diverged considerably from its foreign counterpart, Brent, sometimes selling at a steep discount. Some studies pointed to the ban on exporting U.S. crude oil production as the main culprit for this divergence. We find that scarce domestic pipeline capacity explains half to three quarters of the deviation of mid-continent crude oil prices from their long-run relationship with Brent crude. We are unable to find evidence that mismatch between domestic refining configurations and domestic crude characteristics contributed significantly to this deviation. This implies that the short-run deleterious effects of the export ban may have been exaggerated.
AgertonM.HartleyP.R.IIIK B.M.TemzelidesT. (2017). “Employment impacts of upstream oil and gas investment in the United States.” Energy Economics62: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.012.
2.
AndersonK. (2009). “Distorted agricultural incentives and economic development: Asia’s experience.” World Economy32(3): 351-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01163.x.
BaleM.D.LutzE. (1981). “Price distortions in agriculture and their effects: An international comparison.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics63(1): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1239807.
5.
BausellC.W.JrRuscoF.W.WallsW.D. (2001). “Lifting the Alaskan oil export ban: An intervention analysis.” The Energy Journal22(4): 81-94. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No4-4.
6.
BorensteinS.KelloggR. (2014). “The incidence of an oil glut: Who benefits from cheap crude oil in the midwest?” The Energy Journal35(1): 15-33. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.1.2.
7.
BüyüksahinB.LeeT.K.MoserJ.T.RobeM.A. (2013). “Physical markets, paper markets and the WTI-Brent spread.” The Energy Journal34(3): 129. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.3.7.
8.
CumbyR.E.HuizingaJ. (1992). “Testing the autocorrelation structure of disturbances in ordinary least squares and instrumental variables regressions.” Econometrica60(1): 185-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951684.
9.
DeckerR.McCollumM.UptonG B. (2018). “Firm dynamics and local economic shocks: Evidence from the shale oil and gas boom.” Working Paper.
10.
DudleyR.G. (2004). “Modeling the effects of a log export ban in indonesia.” System Dynamics Review20(2): 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.288.
11.
EbingerC.GreenleyH.L. (2014). “Changing markets. economic opportunities from lifting the U.S. ban on crude oil exports.” Technical report, Brookings.
12.
EIA (2015). “Technical options for processing additional light tight oil volumes within the United States.” Technical report, U.S. Energy Information Administration.
13.
FattouhB. (2007). “WTI benchmark temporarily breaks down: Is it really a big deal?” Middle East Economic Survey 50(20): 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.007.
14.
FattouhB. (2009). “Reinforcing feedbacks, time spreads and oil prices.” Middle East Econmic Survey52: 17-27.
15.
FattouhB. (2010). “The dynamics of crude oil price differentials.” Energy Economics32(2): 334-342.
16.
FeyrerJ.MansurE.T.SacerdoteB. (2017). “Geographic dispersion of economic shocks: Evidence from the fracking revolution.” American Economic Review107(4): 1313-1334. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151326.
17.
FieldenS. (2013, December). I’m Waiting For the Crude—Crude Price Differentials at The Gulf Coast Part 1.
18.
FooksJ.R.DundasS.J.AwokuseT.O. (2013). “Are there efficiency gains from the removal of natural resource export restrictions? Evidence from British Columbia.” The World Economy36(8): 1098-1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12041.
19.
Investor’s Business Daily(2014). WTI Vs. LLS: A Major Shift In The U.S. Oil Boom.
20.
KaminskiV. (2014). “The microstructure of the North American oil market.” Energy Economics46: S1-S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.017.
21.
KaoC.-W.WanJ.-Y. (2012). “Price discount, inventories and the distortion of WTI benchmark.” Energy Economics34(1): 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.004.
22.
KomarekT.M. (2016). “Labor market dynamics and the unconventional natural gas boom: Evidence from the Marcellus region.” Resource and Energy Economics45: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.004.
23.
MarchandJ. (2012). “Local labor market impacts of energy boom-bust-boom in Western Canada.” Journal of Urban Economics71(1): 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.06.001.
24.
MarchandJ.WeberJ. (2018). “Local labor markets and natural resources: A synthesis of the literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys32(2): 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12199.
25.
McCollumM.UptonG.B. (2018). “Local labor market shocks and residential mortgage payments: Evidence from shale oil and gas booms.” Resource and Energy Economics53: 162-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.05.001.
26.
McRaeS. (2015). “Vertical Integration and Price Differentials in the US Crude Oil Market.” Working Paper.
27.
MedlockIII, K.B. (2015). “To Lift or Not to Lift? The U.S. Crude Oil Export Ban: Implications for Price and Energy Security.” Study, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy.
28.
UptonG.B. (2015). “Crude oil exports and the Louisiana economy. a discussion of U.S. policy of restricting crude oil exports and its implications for Louisiana.” LSU Center for Energy Studies Whitepaper.
29.
UptonG.B. and H.Yu (2018). “Local labor market shocks and employment and earnings differentials: Evidence from shale oil and gas booms.” USAEE Working Paper.
30.
von AmsbergJ. (1998). “Economic parameters of deforestation.” World Bank Economic Review12(1): 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/12.1.133.
31.
WangQ.WuN. (2012). “Long-run covariance and its applications in cointegration regression.” Stata Journal12(3): 515-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200312.
32.
WeberJ.G. (2017). “The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming.” Energy Economics34(5): 1580-1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.013.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
