We investigate the extent and evolution of the links between energy markets using a broad data set consisting of a total of 17 series of prices for commodities such as electricity, natural gas, coal, oil and carbon. The results shed light on a number of relevant issues such as the volatility spillover effect in energy markets (within and across sectors) and the identification of those markets that are exporters (importers) of volatility to (from) other markets, as well as evidence of the time-varying nature of these effects. The main conclusions are: (i) the most integrated European electricity markets appear to be those of Germany, France and the Netherlands; (ii) the Dutch Title Transfer Facility might be on the way to becoming the benchmark price for natural gas in Europe, and (iii) natural gas may be replacing crude oil as the global benchmark price for energy commodities.
AlouiR.Ben AissaM.S.HammoudehS.NguyenD.K. (2014). “Dependence and extreme dependence of crude oil and natural gas prices with applications to risk management.” Energy Economics42: 332-342. https://doi.org/10.10l6/j.eneco.2013.12.005
2.
AscheF.OsmunddsenP.SandssmarkM. (2OO6). “The UK market for natural gas, oil and electricity: Are the prices decoupled?.” The Energy Journal27(2): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSNOl95-6574-EJ-Vol27-No2-2
3.
BachmeierL.J.GriffinJ.M. (2OO6). “Testing for market integration crude, oil, coal and natural gas.” The Energy Journal27(2): 55-71. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSNOl95-6574-EJ-Vol27-No2-4
4.
BalcilarM.DemirerR.HammoudehS.NguyenD.K. (2016). “Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk.” Energy Economics54: 159-172. https://doi.org/10.10l6/j.eneco.2515.11.003
5.
BaruníkJ.KocendaE.VachaL. (2015). “Volatility Spillovers across Petroleum Markets.” The Energy Journal36(3): 309-329. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2600204
6.
BattenJ.A.CinerC.LuceyB.M. (20l5). “Which precious metals spill over on which, when and why? Some evidence.” Applied Economics Letters22: 466-473. https://doi.org/l0.l080/l350485l.20l4.950789
7.
BekaertG.HarveyC.R.NgA. (2005). “Market integration and contagion.” Journal of Business78(1): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1086/426519
8.
BentzenJ. (2007). “Does OPEC influence crude oil prices? Testing for co-movements and causality between regional crude oil prices.” Applied Economics39: 1375-1385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600606344
9.
BunnD.GianfredaA. (2010). “Integration and shock transmissions across European electricity forward markets.” Energy Economics32(2): 278-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.005
10.
Castagneto-GisseyG.ChavezM.De Vico FallaniF. (2014). “Dynamic Granger-causality networks of electricity spot prices: a novel approach to market integration.” Energy Economics44: 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.20l4.05.008
De MenezesL.M.HoullierM.A. (2016). “Reassessing the integration of European electricity markets: a fractional cointegration analysis.” Energy Economics53: 132-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.20l4.l0.02l
13.
DegiannakisS.FilisG.AroraV. (2018). “Oil prices and Stock Markets: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence.” The Energy Journal39(5): 85-130. https://doi.org/l0.5547/0l956574.39.5.sdeg
14.
DemirerM.DieboldF.X.LiuL.YilmazK. (2018). “Estimating Global Bank Network Connectedness.” Journal of Applied Econometrics33(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2585
15.
DickeyD.A.FullerW.A. (1979). “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association74: 427-431.
16.
DieboldF.X.YilmazK. (2009). “Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets.” Economic Journal119(534): 158-71. https://doi.org/l0.llll/j.l468-0297.2008.02208.x
17.
DieboldF.X.YilmazK. (2012). “Better to give than to receive: Predictive Directional measurement of volatility spillovers.” International Journal of Forecasting28: 57-66. https://doi.org/l0.l0l6/j.ijforecast.20ll.02.006
18.
DieboldF.X.YilmazK. (2014). “On the network topology of variance decompositions: measuring the connectedness of financial firms.” Journal of Econometrics182: 119-34. https://doi.org/l0.l0l6/j.jeconom.2014.04.0l2
19.
DieboldF.X.LiuL.YilmazK. (2018). “Commodity Connectedness.” Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, In: MendozaE.G.PasténE.SaraviaD., eds., Monetary Policy and Global Spillovers: Mechanisms, Effects and Policy Measures, edition 1, volume 25, chapter 4, pages 097-136, Central Bank of Chile.
20.
EfimovaO.SerletisA. (2014). “Energy markets volatility modelling using GARCH.” Energy Economics43: 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.018
21.
EmeryG.W.LiuQ.W. (2002). “An analysis on the relationship between electricity and natural gas futures prices.” Journal of Futures Markets22(2): 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.2209
22.
EngleR.F.GrangerC.W.J. (1987). “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica55(2):251-276. https://doi.org/l0.2307/l9l3236
23.
European Commission(2015). Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets, Market Observatory for Energy Markets l: Fourth quarter of 2015-First quarter of 2015.
24.
European Commission(2016a). Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets, Market Observatory for Energy Markets l: Second quarter of 2016-Third quarter of 2016.
25.
European Commission(2016b). Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets, Market Observatory for Energy Markets l: First quarter of 2015.
26.
EwingB.MalikF.OzfidenO. (2002). “Volatility transmission in the oil and natural gas markets.” Energy Economics24: 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00060-9
27.
FenglerM.R.GislerK.I. (2015). “A variance spillover analysis without covariances: What do we miss?” Journal of International Money and Finance51: 174-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.11.006
28.
JinX.LinS.X.TamvakisM.V. (2012). “Volatility transmission and volatility impulse response functions in crude oil markets.” Energy Economics34: 2125-2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.03.003
29.
KangS.H.McIverR.YoonS.M. (2017). “Dynamic spillover effects among crude oil, precious metal, and agricultural commodity futures markets.” Energy Economics62(3): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.011
30.
KaoC.W.WanJ.Y. (2009). “Information transmission and market interactions across the Atlantic—an empirical study on the natural gas market.” Energy Economics31: 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.007
31.
KingM.A.WadhwaniS. (1990). “Transmission of volatility between stock markets.” The Review of Financial Studies3(1): 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/3.1.5
32.
KnodtM.PieferN. (2015). Challenges of European External Energy Governance with Emerging Powers. London: Routledge.
33.
KoopG.PesaranM.H.PotterS.M. (1996). “Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models.” Journal of Econometrics74:119-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4
34.
KwiatkowskiD.PhillipsP.C.B.SchmidtP.ShinY. (1992). “Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root.” Journal of Econometrics54 (1-3): 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
35.
Le Pen, Y. and B. Sévi (2010). “Volatility transmission and volatility impulse response functions in European electricity forward markets.” Energy Economics32(4): 758-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.12.003
36.
LewinerC. (2010). “Competitive power: electricity generation.” European Energy Markets Observatory, 2009/2010 Data Set Twelfth Edition. Springer.
37.
LindströmE.ReglandF. (2012). “Modeling extreme dependence between European electricity markets.” Energy Economics34: 899-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.04.006
38.
MacKinnonJ.G. (1991), “Critical values for cointegration tests.” In: R.F. Engle and C.W.J. Granger, eds., Long-run economic relationships: readings in cointegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 13: 267-276.
39.
MohammadiH. (2009). “Electricity prices and fuel costs: long-run relations and short run dynamics.” Energy Economics31: 503-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.001
40.
PhillipsP.C.B.PerronP. (1988). “Testing for a unit root in time series regression.” Biometrika75(2): 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
41.
PesaranM.H.ShinY. (1998). “Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models.” Economics Letters58: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0
42.
ReboredoJ.C. (2014). “Volatility spillovers between the oilmarket and the European Union carbon emission market.” Economic Modelling36: 229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.039
43.
SerletisA.XuL. (2016). “Volatility and a century of energy markets dynamics.” Energy Economics55(C): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.007
44.
SchultzE.SwieringaJ. (2013). “Price discovery in European natural gas markets.” Energy Policy61: 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.080
45.
SiliverstovsB.L’HégaretG.NeumannA.von HirschhausenC. (2005). “International market integration for natural gas? A cointegration analysis of prices in Europe, North America and Japan.” Energy Economics27: 603-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2005.03.002
46.
SimsC.A. (1980). “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica48: 1-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
47.
StrohsalT.WeberE. (2015). “Time-varying international stock market integration and the identification of volatility signals.” Journal of Banking and Finance56: 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.020
48.
ZhangB.WangP. (2014). “Return and volatility spillovers between china and world oil markets.” Economic Modelling42(C): 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
