Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Large but temporary price increases are sometimes deployed on days when the demand for electricity is extremely high due to exceptionally warm or cold weather. But what happens when the extreme price changes are permanent? Between January 2013 and April 2016, natural gas and electricity prices in Ukraine increased dramatically (up to 300% of the initial rates). We exploit variation in tariffs over time and across customers to estimate the price elasticity of electricity demand using a panel dataset with monthly meter readings from households in Uzhhorod in Ukraine. The price elasticity of electricity demand is -0.2 to -0.5, with the bulk of our estimates around -0.3. The elasticity becomes up to 50% more pronounced over the first three months since prices change. We find only limited evidence that persons who are attentive about their consumption levels, their bills, or the tariffs are more responsive to the price changes.

Keywords

Residential electricity demand Short-run price elasticity Increasing block rates Attentiveness CO2 emissions reductions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alberini

Gans

Velez-Lopez

(2011). “Residential Consumption of Gas and Electricity in the U.S.: The Role of Prices and Income,” Energy Economics 33(5): 870-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.015.

Baum

C.F.

Schaffer

M.E.

Stillman

(2003),.“Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing.” The Stata Journal 3(1): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300101.

Bastos

Castro

Cristia

Scartascini

(2011),.“Does Energy Consumption Respond to Price Shocks?” IDB working paper IDB-WP-234, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, January.

Bell

Blundell

(2016). “2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation,” DRMEC Spring 2016, San Francisco, California.

Borenstein

(2009). “To What Electricity Price Do Consumers Respond? Residential Demand Elasticity Under Increasing-Block Pricing.” University of California Berkeley.

Frey

(2015). “Assessing the Impact of a Carbon Tax in Ukraine,” available at https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/re-sources/download/7495.pdf

Herter

Wayland

(2010). “Residential Response to Critical-peak Pricing of Electricity: California Evidence.” Energy 35: 1561-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.022.

Hewitt

J.A.

Hanemann

W.M.

(1995). “A Discrete/Continuous Choice Approach to Residential Water Demand under Block Rate Pricing.” Land Economics 71(2): 173-192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146499.

Hortaçsu

Madanizadeh

S.A.

Puller

S.L.

(2017). “Power to Choose? An Analysis of Consumer Inertia in the Residential Electricity Market.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 9(4): 192-226. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150235.

10.

INOGATE (2015). A Review of Energy Tariffs in INOGATE Partner Countries, available at http://www.inogate.org/docu-ments/A_Review_of_Energy_Tariffs_in_INOGATE_Partner_Countries.pdf

11.

International Energy Agency (2016). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Highlights, available at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2EmissionsfromFuelCombustion_Highlights_2016.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2017).

12.

Ito

(2014). “Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing.” American Economic Review 104(2): 537-63. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.537.

13.

Jessoe

Rapson

(2014). “Knowledge is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use.” American Economic Review 104(4): 1417-1438. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1417.

14.

Kahn

M.E.

Wolak

F.A.

(2013). “Using Information to Improve the Effectiveness of Non-Linear Pricing: Evidence from a Field Experiment,” available at http://web.stanford.edu/group/fwolak/cgi-bin/sites/default/files/files/kahn_wolak_July_2_2013.pdf (last accessed 1 November 2017)

15.

Liebman

J.B.

Zeckhauser

R.J.

(2004). “Schmeduling,” available at https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/jeffreyliebman/schmeduling.pdf

16.

Mansur

E.T.

Olmstead

S.M.

(2012). “The Value of Scarce Water: Measuring the Inefficiency of Municipal Regulations.” Journal of Urban Economics 71(3): 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2011.11.003.

17.

McFadden

Puig

Kirshner

(1977), “‘Determinants of the Long-Run Demand for Electricity.” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association 109-19. 17.

18.

Miller

Alberini

(2016), “Sensitivity of Price Elasticity of Demand to Aggregation, Unobserved Heterogeneity, Price Trends, and Price Endogeneity: Evidence from US Data.” Energy Policy 97: 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.031.

19.

McRae

(2015). “Infrastructure Quality and the Subsidy Trap.” American Economic Review 105(1): 35-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20110572.

20.

McRae

Meeks

(2016). “Price Perception and Electricity Demand with Nonlinear Tariffs,” mimeo, September.

21.

Nieswiadomy

M.L.

Molina

D.J.

(1989). “Comparing Residential Water Demand Estimates under Decreasing and Increasing Block Rates using Household Data.” Land Economics 65(3): 280-289. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146672.

22.

Pon

(2017). “The Effect of Information on TOU Residential Use: An Irish Residential Study.” The Energy Journal 38(6): 55-79. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.6.spon.

23.

Reiss

P.C.

White

M.W.

(2005), “Household Electricity Demand, Revisited.” Review of Economic Studies 72: 851-883. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00354.

24.

Rozwalka

Torfengren

(2016). “The Ukrainian Residential Gas Sector: A Market Untapped.” The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies paper NG 109, University of Oxford, July. https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784670603.

25.

Saez

(2010). “Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points?” America Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(3): 180-212. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.2.3.180.

26.

Shin

(1985). “Perception of Price When Price Information is Costly: Evidence from Residential Electricity Demand.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 591-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924803.

27.

Wolak

F.A.

(2011). “Do Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment.” American Economic Review 101(3): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.83.

28.

Wooldridge

J.M.

(2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB