The paper analyzes the interactions between trade and renewable energy policies based on the EU-China solar panel dispute which is the most significant antidumping (AD) complaint in Europe. We build a price competition duopoly model with differentiated products and intra-industry trade in photovoltaic (PV) equipment. We show that an optimal antidumping duty always increases with the feed-in tariff (FIT) program set in the home country. An appropriate antidumping duty—nullifying the dumping margin—decreases with the FIT program. We show that optimal FIT increases with the AD duty. Therefore, trade and renewable energy optimal policies may complement one another. Lastly, we introduce R&D activities in the PV sector, and international spillovers. We show that R&D makes the optimal FIT lower and increases the dumping margin. These effects are reinforced by technological spillovers.
AndersonS.P.SchmittN.ThisseJ.F (1995). “Who Benefits from Antidumping Legislation?” Journal of International Economics38: 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(94)01347-U.d’
2.
Aspremont,C. and A. Jacquemin (1988). “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spilloverg” American Economic Review78: 1133-1137.
3.
BennearL.S.StavinsR.N. (2007). “Second-Best Theory and the Use of Multiple Policy Instruments.” Environmental and Resource Economics37: 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9110-y.
4.
BernhofenD.M. (1995). “Price Dumping in Intermediate Good Markets.” Journal of International Economics39: 159-173.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(94)01357-X.
5.
BlonigenB.A.PrusaTJ. (2016). “Dumping and Antidumping Duties.”In: Handbook of Commercial Policy, K. Bagwell and R.W. Staiger (eds), Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, 107-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.008.
6.
BougetteP.CharlierCh. (2015) “Renewable Energy, Subsidies, and the WTO: Where has the ’Green’ Gone?” Energy Economics51: 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2015.07.006.
7.
CharnovitzS.FischerC. (2015). “Canada-Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies.” World Trade Review14: 177-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745615000063.
8.
ChenG. (2015). “From Mercantile Strategy to Domestic Demand Stimulation: Changes in China’s Solar PV Subsidies.” Asia Pacific Business Review21: 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2014.939897.
9.
ClarkeR.CollieD.R. (2003). “Product Differentiation and the Gains from Trade under Bertrand Duopoly.” Canadian Journal of Economics36: 658-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-2-00007.
10.
CollieD.R.LeV.P.M. (2010). “Antidumping Regulations: Anti-Competitive and Anti-Export.” Review of International Economics18: 796-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00891.x.
11.
CrowleyM.A.SongH. (2015). “Policy Shocks and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from Chinese Solar Panels.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 1529.
12.
CurranL. (2015) “The Impact of Trade Policy on Global Production Networks: The Solar Panel Case.” Review of International Political Economy22: 1025-1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1014927.
13.
CurranL.LvP.SpigarelliF. (2017). “Policy Shocks and Stock Market Returns: Evidence from Chinese Solar Panels.” Energy Policy101: 670-682. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2016.09.018.
14.
DinlersozE.DoganC. (2010). “Tariffs versus Anti-Dumping Duties.” International Review of Economics &Finance19: 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.10.007.
15.
DrechslerM.MeyerhoffJ.OhlC. (2012). “The Effect of Feed-In Tariffs on the Production Cost and the Landscape Externalities of Wind Power Generation in West Saxony, Germany.” Energy Policy48: 730-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.008.
16.
European Commission (2009). “Council Regulation No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.” Official Journal of the European Union 22.12.2009, L 343/51.
17.
European Commission (2016). “The European Union’s Measures against Dumped and Subsidized Imports of Solar Panels from China 29 February 2016 update .” http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/july/tradoc_153587.pdf.
18.
European Commission(2017a). “Commission implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 of 1 March 2017.” Official Journal of the European Union, 03.03.2017, L 56/131.
19.
European Commission(2017b). “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1570 of 15 September 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367.” Official Journal of the European Union, 16.9.2017, L 238/22.
20.
FarrellN.DevineM.T.LeeW.TGleesonJ.P.LyonsS. (2017). “Specifying An Efficient Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariff.” The Energy Journal38: 53-75. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.2.nfar.
21.
FischerC. (2017). “Environmental Protection for Sale: Strategic Green Industrial Policy and Climate Finance.” Environmental and Resource Economics66: 553-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0092-5.
22.
FischerC.GreakerM.RosendahlK.N. (2018). “Strategic Technology Policy as a Supplement to Renewable Energy Standards.” Resource and Energy Economics51: 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.reseneeco.2017.05.006.
23.
FischerC.PreonasL. (2010). “Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economic4: 51-92. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000030.
24.
GaoX.MiyagiwaK. (2005). “Antidumping Protection and R&D Competition.” Canadian Journal of Economics38: 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00276.x.
25.
GrauT.HuoM.NeuhoffK. (2012). “Survey of Photovoltaic Industry and Policy in Germany and China.” Energy Policy51: 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.082.
26.
GoronC. (2018). “Fighting Against Climate Change and for Fair Trade: Finding the EU’s Interest in the Solar Panels Dispute with China.” China-EU Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-018-0080-z.
27.
GrobaF.CaoJ. (2015). “Chinese Renewable Energy Technology Exports: The Role of Policy, Innovation and Markets.” Environmental and Resource Economics60: 243-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9766-z.
28.
HuangX.AnH.FangW.GaoX.WangL.SunX. (2016). “Impact Assessment of International Anti-dumping Events on Synchronization and Comovement of the Chinese Photovoltaic Stocks.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews59: 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.231.
29.
HughesL.MecklingJ. (2017). “The Politics of Renewable Energy Trade: The US-China Solar Dispute.” Energy Policy105: 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.044.
30.
International Energy Agency (IAE) (2006). “Renewable Energy: R&D Priorities. Insights from IAE Technology Programmes.” Report.
31.
JaffeA.B.NewellR.G.StavinsR.N. (2005). “A Tale of Two Market Failures: Technology and Environmental Policy.” Ecological Economics54: 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.ecolecon.2004.12.027.
32.
JaraiteJ.KarimuA.AndriusKazukauskas A. (2017). “Policy-Induced Expansion of Solar and Wind Power Capacity: Economic Growth and Employment in EU Countries.” The Energy Journal38: 197-222. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.5.jjar.
33.
JennerS.ChanG.FrankenbergerR.GabelM. (2012). “What Drives States to Support Renewable Energy?.” The Energy Journal33: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.1.
34.
KaoK.F.PengC. (2016). “Anti-dumping Protection, Price Undertaking and Product Innovation.” International Review of Economics &Finance41: 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.09.006.
35.
KoningsJ.VandenbusscheH. (2008). “Heterogeneous Responses of Firms to Trade Protection.” Journal of International Economics76: 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjinteco.2008.08.002.
36.
LehmannP.GawelE. (2013). “Why Should Support Schemes for Renewable Electricity Complement the EU Emissions Trading Scheme?” Energy Policy52: 597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.018.
37.
LewisJ. I. (2014). “The Rise of Renewable Energy Protectionism: Emerging Trade Conflicts and Implications for Low Carbon Development.” Global Environmental Politics10-35. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00255.
38.
LipseyR.G.LancasterK. (1956). “The General Theory of Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies24: 11-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296233.
39.
Perez de Arce, M. and E. Sauma (2016). “Comparison of Incentive Policies for Renewable Energy in an Oligopolistic Market with Price-Responsive Demand.” The Energy Journal37: 159-198. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.3.mdea.
40.
PillaiU. (2015). “Drivers of Cost Reduction in Solar Photovoltaics.” Energy Economics50: 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.05.015.
ShadikhodjaevS. (2015). “Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?” World Trade Review14: 479-506. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745614000317.
43.
SykesA.O. (2014). “The Economics of Injury in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases.” International Review of Law and Economics16: 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(95)00054-2
44.
VeugelersR.VandenbusscheH. (1999). “European Anti-Dumping Policy and the Profitability of National and International Collusion.” European Economic Review43: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00128-1.
45.
VoituriezT.WangX. (2015). “Real Challenges behind the EU-China PV Trade Dispute Settlement.” Climate Policy15: 670-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1009868.
46.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2014). “Global Challenges Report. Renewable Energy Technology: Evolution and Policy Implications—Evidence from Patent Literature.” Report, Geneva.
47.
ZanardiM. (2006). “Antidumping: A Problem in International Trade.” European Journal of Political Economy22: 591-617.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.003.
48.
ZhangM.M.ZhouD.Q.ZhouP.LiuG.Q. (2016). “Optimal Feed-in Tariff for Solar Photovoltaic Power Generation in China: A Real Options Analysis.” Energy Policy97: 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.028.
49.
ZhangS. (2018). “Wind and Solar Power in China.” In: China's Electricity Sector, Springer, Singapore, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8192-7_4.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
