We estimate partial and total own and cross price elasticities between electricity, gas and oil, using firm-level data. We find that, based on the partial elasticity measure, electricity is the least-responsive fuel to changes in its own price and in the price of other fuels. The total elasticity measure, which adjusts the partial elasticity for changes in aggregate energy demand induced by individual fuel price changes, reveals that the demand for electricity is much more price responsive than the partial elasticity suggests. Our results illustrate the importance of accounting for the feedback effect between interfactor and interfuel elasticities when considering the effectiveness of environmental taxation. We use the estimated elasticities to simulate the impact of a €15/tCO2 carbon tax on average energy-related CO2 emissions.
AcemogluD.AghionP.BursztynL.HemousD. (2012). “The Environment and Directed Technical Change.” American Economic Review102(1): 131-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.L131.
2.
ArnbergS.Bj0rnerT.B. (2007). “Substitution between energy, capital and labour within industrial companies: A micro panel data analysis.” Resource and Energy Economics29(2): 122-136 ISSN 0928-7655 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.01.001.
3.
BardazziR.OropalloF.PazienzaM. G. (2015). “Do manufacturing firms react to energy prices? Evidence from Italy.” Energy Economics49: 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.014.
4.
BerndtE.R.WoodD.O. (1975). “Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics57(3): 259-268 ISSN 00346535.
5.
BjØrnerT.B.JensenH.H. (2002a). “Energy taxes, voluntary agreements and investment subsidies—a micro-panel analysis of the effect on Danish industrial companies energy demand.” Resource and Energy Economics24(3): 229-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00049-5.
6.
BjØrnerT.B.JensenH.H. (2002b). “Interfuel substitution within industrial companies: An analysis based on panel data at company level.” The Energy Journal23(2): 27-50.
7.
BousquetA.LadouxN. (2006). “Flexible versus designated technologies and interfuel substitution.” Energy Economics28(4): 426-443. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2006.02.001.
8.
CahillN. (2012). “Decarbonising Energy End Use—Background Paper No.5.” Technical report National Economic and Social Concil (NESC).
9.
ChoW.G.NamK.PaganJ.A. (2004). “Economic growth and interfactor/interfuel substitution in Korea.” Energy Economics26(1): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2003.04.001.
10.
ConveryFJ.DunneL.JoyceD. (2013). “Ireland’s Carbon Tax and the Fiscal Crisis: Issues in Fiscal Adjustment, Envi-ronmentalEffectiveness,Competitiveness, LeakageandEquityImplications.” Technical report OECD Publishing.
11.
CSOC. (2009a). Estimates of the capital stock of fixed assets. Stationary Office, Dublin.
12.
CSOC. (2009b).Supply and Use and Input-Output Tables for Ireland 2005. Stationary Office, Dublin. Curtin, J. (2012). “Decarbonising Energy End Use—Background Paper No.6” Technical report National Economic and Social Council (NESC).
13.
ESRI (2012). www.esri.ie/irish_economy/databank, accessed on 16.01.2013.
14.
EUKLEMS (2009). www.euklems.net, accessed on 16.06.2010.
15.
FlorosN.VlachouA. (2005). “Energy demand and energy-related CO2 emissions in Greek manufacturing: Assessing the impact of a carbon tax.” Energy Economics27(3): 387-413 ISSN 0140-9883 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.12.006.
16.
FussM.A. (1977). “The demand for energy in Canadian manufacturing: An example of the estimation of production structures with many inputs.” Journal of Econometrics5(1): 89-116 ISSN 0304-4076. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90036-7.
17.
HallV.B. (1986). “Major OECD country industrial sector interfuel substitution estimates, 1960-1979.” Energy Economics8(2): 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(86)90032-0.
18.
HallerS.A.HylandM. (2014). “Capital-energy substitution: Evidence from a panel of Irish manufacturing firms.” Energy Economics45: 501-510 ISSN 0140-9883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.003.
19.
HallerS.A.MurphyL. (2012). “Corporate expenditure on environmental protection” Environmental and Resource Economics51(2): 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9499-1.
20.
HalvorsenR. (1977). “Energy substitution in US manufacturing” The Review of Economics and Statistics: 381-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928702.
21.
HowleyM.DennehyE.HollandM.OGallachoirB. (2012). “Energy in Ireland: Key statistics 2012.” Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland, Energy Policy Statistical Support Unit, Cork, Ireland.
22.
HowleyM.HollandM. (2013). “Energy in Ireland 1990-2012” Technical report SEAI.
23.
JonesC.T. (1995). “A Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution in U.S. Industrial Energy Demand.” Journal of Business &Economic Statistics13(4): 459-465 ISSN 07350015.
24.
Leon-LedesmaM.A.McAdamP.WillmanA. (2010). “Identifying the elasticity of substitution with biased technical change.” The American Economic Review100(4): 1330-1357. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1330.
25.
NguyenS.V.StreitwieserM.L. (1999). “Factor Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing: Does Plant Size Matter?” Small Business Economics12(1): 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084704648.
26.
O’MahonyM.TimmerM.P (2009). “Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: the EU KLEMS Database.” Economic Journal119(538): F374-F403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x.
27.
PapageorgiouC.SaamM.SchulteP (2013). “Elasticity of substitution between clean and dirty energy inputs: A macroeconomic perspective.” Technical report ZEW Discussion Papers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349534.
28.
PindyckR.S. (1979). “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison.” The Review of Economics and Statistics61(2): 169-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924584.
29.
SerletisA.TimilsinaG.VasetskyO. (2010a). “International evidence on sectoral interfuel substitution” The Energy Journal31(4): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No4-1.
30.
SerletisA.TimilsinaG.R.VasetskyO. (2010b). “Interfuel substitution in the United States.” Energy Economics32(3): 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.013.
31.
SolowJ.L. (1987). “The Capital-Energy Complementarity Debate Revisited.” The American Economic Review77(4): 605-614 ISSN00028282.
32.
StanleyT.DoucouliagosH. (2010). “Picture this: a simple graph that reveals much ado about research.” Journal of Economic Surveys24(1): 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00593.x.
33.
SteinbuksJ. (2012). “Interfuel Substitution and Energy Use in the UK Manufacturing Sector.” The Energy Journal33(1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol33-No1-1.
34.
SteinbuksJ.NarayananB.G. (2015). “Fossil fuel producing economies have greater potential for industrial interfuel substitution.” Energy Economics47: 168-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.001.
35.
SteinbuksJ.NeuhoffK. (2014). “Assessing energy price induced improvements in efficiency of capital in OECD manufacturing industries.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management68(2): 340-356. https://doi.0rg/lO.lOl6/j.jeem.2014.07.003.
36.
SternD.I. (2009). “Interfuel Substitution: A Meta-Analysis.” Mpra paper University Library of Munich, Germany.
37.
SternD.I. (2011). “Elasticities of substitution and complementarity.” Journal of Productivity Analysis36(1): 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0203-1.
38.
SternD.I. (2012). “Interfuel Substitution: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Economic Surveys26(2): 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00646.x.
39.
Sue WingI. (2008). “Explaining the declining energy intensity of the US economy.” Resource and Energy Economics30(1): 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.03.001.
40.
TaheriA. A.StevensonR. (2002). “Energy price, environmental policy, and technological bias.” The Energy Journal23(4): 85-107. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No4-4.
41.
The World Bank (2012). “World Development Indicators: Energy use (kg of oil equivalent) per $1,000 GDP (constant 2011 PPP).” http://data.worldbank.org, accessed on 21.09.2015.
42.
WoodlandA.D. (1993). “A Micro-Econometric Analysis of the Industrial Demand for Energy in NSW.” The Energy Journal14(2): 57-90. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol14-No2-4.
43.
World Bank, T., Ecofys, and V. Economics (2016). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016. World Bank.
44.
ZnuderlN.KearneyI. (2013). “User Cost of Debt-Financed Capital in Irish Manufacturing Industry: 1985—2011” ESRI Working Paper No. 44
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
