This study examines the hypothesis that changes to high-powered incentive regulations have a positive efficiency and productivity growth effects in a regulated electricity distribution industry. We estimate an input distance function using the stochastic frontier analysis method to compute technical efficiency scores for 121 Norwegian utilities over the period 2004-2012. We explore sources of productivity growth by parametrically decomposing the Malmquist productivity index into efficiency change, technical change, and scale change. Unlike previous studies, we examine the difference in performance across two regulatory regimes: yardstick competition (2007-2012) and RPI-X incentive regulation (2004-2006). Results show significant efficiency and productivity growth improvements with embodied technical change as the main driver.
AgrellP. J.BogetoftP.TindJ. (2000). “Multi-period DEA incentive regulation in electricity distribution.” CIE Discussion Paper 2000-13, Center for Industrial Economics, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
2.
AgrellPJ.BogetoftP.TindJ. (2005). “DEA and dynamic yardstick competition in Scandinavian electricity distribution.” Journal of Productivity Analysis23(2): 173-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-005-1327-6.
3.
jodhiaV.HakvoortR. (2005). “Economic regulation of quality in electricity distribution networks.” Utilities Policy13(3): 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjup.2004.07.008.
4.
AmundsveenR.KvileH.M. (2016). “Balancing incentives: The development and application of a regulatory benchmarking model.”In Productivity and Efficiency Analysis, W.H. Greene, L. Khalaf, R. Sickles, M. Veall, and M.-C. Voia, editors, pages 233-247. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23228-7_14.
5.
AverchH.JohnsonL.L. (1962). “Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint.” American Economic Review52(5): 1052-1069.
6.
BatteseG.E.CoelliTJ. (1988). “Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data.” Journal of Econometrics38(3): 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-X.
7.
BatteseG.E.CoelliTJ. (1992). “Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1): 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158774.
8.
BatteseG.E.CoelliT.J. (1995). “A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data.” Empirical Economics20(2): 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442.
9.
BelottiF.DaidoneS.IlardiG.Atellaand V., (2013). Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. STATA Journal, 13(4): 719758.
10.
BjØrndalE.Bj0rndalM.FangeK.-A. (2010). “Benchmarking in regulation of electricity networks in Norway: An overview.”In Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics, E. Bj0rndal, M. Bj0rndal, P.M. Pardalos, and M. Ronnqvist, editors, pages 317-342. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12067-1_18.
11.
CavesD.W.ChristensenL.R.DiewertW.E. (1982). “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity.” Econometrica50(6): 1393-1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388.
12.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W.LauL.J. (1973). “Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers.” The Review of Economics and Statistics55(1): 28-5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927992.
13.
CoelliT.EstacheA.PerelmanS.TrujilloL. (2003). A primer on efficiency measurement for utilities and transport regulators, volume 953. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5379-9.
14.
CoelliTJ.GautierA.PerelmanS.Saplacan-PopR. (2013). “Estimating the cost of improving quality in electricity distribution: A parametric distance function approach.” Energy Policy53: 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.20i2.i0.060.
15.
CoelliT.J.RaoD.S.P.O’DonnellC.J.BatteseG.E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, second edition.
16.
DimitropoulosD.YatchewA. (2017). “Is productivity growth in electricity distribution negative? an empirical analysis using Ontario data.” The Energy Journal38(2): 175-200. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.2.ddim.
17.
EdvardsenD.F.F0rsundF.R.HansenW.KittelsenS.A.C.NeurauterT. (2006). “Productivity and regulatory reform of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities.”In393 Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities, T. Coelli, and D. Lawrence, editors, pages 97-131. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
18.
FareR.GrosskopfS.LindgrenB.RoosP. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Springer, Berlin.
19.
FareR.GrosskopfS.LindgrenB.RoosP. (1994). “Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach.”In Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, C. Abraham, C. William, L.Y. Arie, and S.M. Lawrence, editors, pages 253-272. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5_13.
20.
FareR.PrimontD. (1990). “A distance function approach to multioutput technologies.” Southern Economic Journal56(4): 879-891. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059878.
21.
FengG.SerletisA. (2009). “Efficiency and productivity of the US banking industry, 1998-2005: Evidence from the fourier cost function satisfying global regularity conditions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics24(1): 105-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1021.
22.
FrØsundF.R.KittelsenS.A. (1998). “Productivity development of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities.” Resource and Energy Economics20(3): 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00028-6.
23.
FreixasX.GuesnerieR.TiroleJ. (1985). “Planning under incomplete information and the ratchet effect.” The Review of Economic Studies52(2): 173-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297615.
24.
GreeneW. (2004). “Distinguishing between heterogeneity and inefficiency: stochastic frontier analysis of the world health organization’s panel data on national health care systems.” Health Economics13(10): 959-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.938.
25.
GreeneW. (2005a). “Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis23(1): 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1.
26.
GreeneW. (2005b). “Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model.” Journal of Econometrics126(2): 269-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.003.
27.
GrowitschC.JamasbT.MullerC.WissnerM. (2010). “Social cost-efficient service quality, integrating customer valuation in incentive regulation: Evidence from the case of Norway.” Energy Policy38(5): 2536-2544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.049.
28.
GrowitschC.JamasbT.WetzelH. (2012). “Efficiency effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Norwegian electricity distribution networks.” Energy Economics34(2): 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.013.
29.
JamasbT.OreaL.PollittM. (2012). “Estimating the marginal cost of quality improvements: The case of the UK electricity distribution companies.” Energy Economics34(5): 1498-1506. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2012.06.022.
30.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2000). “Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience.” Utility and Policy9(3): 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(01)00010-8.
31.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2003). “International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities.” Energy Policy31(15): 1609-1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00226-4.
32.
JoskowP.L. (2008). “Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization.” The Energy Journal29(SI2): 227-251. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-NoSI2-3.
33.
KumbhakarS.C. (1991). “Estimation of technical inefficiency in panel data models with firm-and time-specific effects.” Economics Le''ers36(1): 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(91)90053-N.
34.
KumbhakarS.C.AmundsveenR.KvileH.M.LienG. (2015a). “Scale economies, technical change and efficiency in Norwegian electricity distribution, 1998-2010.” Journal of Productivity Analysis43(3): 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0427-6.
35.
KumbhakarS.C.DennyM.FussM. (2000). “Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: A panel data approach.” Economic Review19(4): 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800481.
36.
KumbhakarS.C.LienG. (2017). “Yardstick regulation of electricity distribution-disentangling short-run and long-run inefficiencies.” The Energy Journal38(5). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.5.skum.
37.
KumbhakarS.C.LienG.HardakerJ.B. (2014). “Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: A study of Norwegian grain farming.” Journal of Productivity Analysis41(2): 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0303-1.
38.
KumbhakarS.C.ParmeterC.F.TsionasE.G. (2013). “A zero inefficiency stochastic frontier model.” Journal of Econometrics172(1): 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2012.08.021.
39.
KumbhakarS.C.WangH.HorncastleA.P. (2015b). A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342070.
40.
KwokaJ.E. (2005). “Electric power distribution: economies of scale, mergers, and restructuring.” Applied Economics37(20): 2373-2386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500309247.
41.
LaffontJ.-J.TiroleJ. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT press.
42.
LangsetT.SyvertsenS.C. (2013). “A new WACC model in the regulation of the Norwegian electricity network operators.”In The Proceedings of the 1st Conference of 'he RCEM and ICSTF, ESCP. Europe Business School, London.
43.
LangsetT.TrengereidF.SamdalK.HeggsetJ. (2001). “Quality dependent revenue caps-a model for quality of supply regulation.”In The Proceedings of the 16th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2001), volume 6, pages 4-6. IET-Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20010906.
MigueisV.L.CamanhoA.S.Bj0rndalE.Bj0rndalM. (2012). “Productivity change and innovation in Norwegian electricity distribution companies.” Journal of the Operational Research Society63(7): 982-990. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.82.
46.
NepalR.JamasbT. (2012). “Reforming the power sector in transition: Do institutions matter?” Energy Economics34(5): 1675-1682. https://doi.org/10.10167j.eneco.2012.02.002.
47.
NeubergL.G. (1977). “Two issues in the municipal ownership of electric power distribution systems.” The Bell Journal of Economics8(1): 303-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003501.
48.
OreaL. (2002). “Parametric decomposition of a generalized Malmquist productivity index.” Journal of Productivity Analysis18(1): 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015793325292.
49.
OreaL.AlvarezI.C.JamasbT. (2018). “A spatial stochastic frontier model with omitted variables: Electricity distribution in Norway.” The Energy Journal39(2): 93-116.
50.
OreaL.JamasbT. (2017). “Regulating heterogeneous utilities: A new latent class approach with application to the Norwegian electricity distribution networks.” The Energy Journal4(38): 101-127. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.4.lore.
51.
PantziosC.J.KaragiannisG.TzouvelekasV. (2011). “Parametric decomposition of the input-oriented Malmquist productivity index: with an application to Greek aquaculture.” Journal of Productivity Analysis36(1): 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0202-2.
52.
PorterM. (1991). “America’s green strategy.” Scientific American264(4): 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificameri-can0491-168.
53.
PorterM.E.van der LindeC. (1995). “Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship.” Journal of Economic Perspectives9(4): 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
54.
RoblesH.B.IlonenM.SyvertsenS.C. (2011). “Economic regulation of electricity grids in Nordic countries.” Technical report, Nordic Energy Regulators-NordREG.
55.
Royal Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (1990). The Energy Act: Act Relating to the Generation, Conversion, Transmission, Trading, Distribution and Use of Energy, Act No. 50 of 29June1990.
56.
RungsuriyawiboonS.CoelliT. (2006). “Regulatory reform and economic performance in us electricity generation.”In Perfomance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities, T. Coelli and D. Lawrence, editors, pages 267-296. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK.
57.
SaalD.S.ParkerD.Weyman-JonesT. (2007). “Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000.” Journal of Productivity Analysis28(1-2): 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0040-z.
58.
SchmidtP. (2011). “One-step and two-step estimation in SFA models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis36(2): 201-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0228-0.
59.
ShephardR.W. (1970). The Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
60.
ShleiferA. (1985). “A theory of yardstick competition.” The RAND Journal of Economics16(3): 319-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555560.
61.
WangH.-J.HoC.W. (2010). “Estimating fixed-effect panel stochastic frontier models by model transformation.” Journal of Econometrics157(2): 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2009.12.006.
62.
WangH.-J.SchmidtP. (2002). “One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels.” Journal of Productivity Analysis18(2): 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016565719882.
63.
WeitzmanM.L. (1980). “The ‘ratchet principle’and performance incentives.” The Bell Journal of Economics11(1): 302308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003414.
64.
YatchewA. (2001). “Incentive regulation of distributing utilities using yardstick competition.” The Electricity Journal14(1): 56-60.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(00)00175-5.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
