An important methodological issue in efficiency analysis for incentive regulation of utilities is how to account for the effect of unobserved cost drivers such as environmental factors. We combine a spatial econometric approach with stochastic frontier analysis to control for unobserved environmental conditions when measuring efficiency of electricity distribution utilities. Our empirical strategy relies on the geographic location of firms as a source of information that has previously not been explored in the literature. The underlying idea is to utilise data from neighbouring firms that can be spatially correlated as proxies for unobserved cost drivers. We illustrate this approach using a dataset of Norwegian distribution utilities for the 2004-2011 period. We show that the lack of information on weather and geographic conditions can be compensated with data from surrounding firms. The methodology can be used in efficiency analysis and regulation of other utilities sectors where unobservable cost drivers are important, e.g. gas, water, agriculture, fishing.
AgrellP.BogetoftP. (2013). Benchmarking and Regulation, CORE Discussion Paper.
2.
AnselinL. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1.
3.
ArbiaG. (2014). A Primer for Spatial Econometrics: With Applications in R. Palgrave Texts in Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317940.
4.
ArealF.J.BalcombeK.TiffinR. (2012). “Integrating Spatial Dependence into Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics56(4): 521-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00597.x.
5.
BaltagiB.H.LiuL. (2011). “Instrumental Variable Estimation of a Spatial Autoregressive Panel Model with Random Effects.” Economics Letters111(2): 135-137. https://doi.org/10.10167j.econlet.2011.01.016.
6.
CoelliT.J.GautierA.PerelmanS.Saplacan-PopR. (2013). “Estimating the Cost of Improving Quality in Electricity Distribution: A Parametric Distance Function Approach.” Energy Policy53: 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2012.10.060.
7.
DimitropoulosD.YatchewA. (2017). “Is Productivity Growth in Electricity Distribution Negative? An Empirical Analysis Using Ontario Data.” The Energy Journal38(2): 175-200. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.2.ddim.
ElhorstJ.P. (2014). “Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels”, Springer Briefs in Regional Science, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8.
10.
Frontiers Economics (2012). Trends in Electricity Distribution Network Regulation in North West Europe. A Report Prepared for Energy Norway.
11.
GlassA.KenjegalievaK.SicklesR. (2016). “Spatial Autoregressive and Spatial Durbin Stochastic Frontier Models for Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics190: 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2015.06.011.
12.
GreeneW. (2005). “Reconsidering Heterogeneity in Panel Data Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Model.” Journal of Econometrics126: 269-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.003.
13.
GreeneW.OreaL.WallA. (2011). A One-Stage Random Effect Counterpart of the Fixed-Effect Vector Decomposition Model with an Application to UK Electricity Distribution Utilities, Efficiency Series Papers 01/2011, Oviedo Efficiency Group, University of Oviedo.
14.
GrowitschC.JamasbT.WetzelH. (2012). “Efficiency Effects of Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity: Evidence from Norwegian Electricity Distribution Networks.” Energy Economics34: 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016zj.ene-co.2011.10.013.
15.
HaneyA.B.PollittM. (2013). “International Benchmarking of Electricity Transmission by Regulators: A Contrast Between Theory and Practice?”, Energy Policy62: 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.042.
16.
HansenL.P. (1982). “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica50: 10291054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775.
17.
HattoriT.JamasbT.PollittM. (2005). “Electricity Distribution in the UK and Japan: A Comparative Efficiency Analysis 1985-1998.” The Energy Journal26(2): 23-47. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No2-2.
18.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2003). “International Benchmarking and Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Distribution Utilities.” Energy Policy31(15): 1609-1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00226-4.
19.
JamasbT.OreaL.PollittM. (2012). “Estimating the Marginal Cost of Quality Improvements: The Case of the UK Electricity Distribution Companies.” Energy Economics34(5): 1498-1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.022.
20.
JamasbT.PollittM.TriebsT. (2008). “Productivity and Efficiency of US Gas Transmission Companies: A European Regulatory Perspective.” Energy Policy36(9): 3398-3412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.001.
21.
JondrowJ.LovellK.MaterovI.SchmidtP. (1982). “On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model.” Journal of Econometrics19: 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5.
22.
KelejianH.H.PruchaI.R. (1998). “A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics17(1): 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007707430416.
23.
KelejianH.H.PruchaI.R. (2010). “Specification and Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models with Autoregressive and Heteroskedastic Disturbances.” Journal of Econometrics157(1): 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2009.10.025.
24.
Kopsakangas-SavolainenM.SventoR. (2011). “Observed and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Stochastic Frontier Models: An Application to the Electricity Distribution Industry.” Energy Economics33(2): 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.010.
25.
KumbhakarS.C.AmundsveenR.KvileH.M.LienG. (2015), “Scale Economies, Technical Change and Efficiency in Norwegian Electricity Distribution, 1998-2010.” Journal of Productivity Analysis43(3): 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0427-6.
26.
KumbhakarS.C.LienG. (2017). “Yardstick Regulation of Electricity Distribution-Disentangling Short-run and Long-run Inefficiencies.” The Energy Journal38(5): 17-37. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.5.skum.
27.
KumbhakarS.C.LovellC.A.K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174411.
28.
LlorcaM.OreaL.PollittM. (2014). “Using the Latent Class Approach to Cluster Firms in Benchmarking: An Application to the US Electricity Transmission Industry.” Operations Research Perspectives1(1): 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2014.03.002.
29.
MigueisV.L.CamanhoA.S.BjørndalE.BjørndalM. (2012). “Productivity Change and Innovation in Norwegian Electricity Distribution Companies.” Journal of the Operational Research Society63: 982-990. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.82.
30.
MundlakY. (1978). “On the Pooling of Time-Series and Cross-Section Data.” Econometrica64: 69-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646.
31.
OreaL.JamasbT. (2017). “Regulating Heterogeneous Utilities: A New Latent Class Approach with Application to the Norwegian Electricity Distribution Networks.” The Energy Journal38(4): 101-127. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38A lore.
32.
OreaL.JamasbT.GrowitschC. (2015). “Using Supervised Environmental Composites in Production and Efficiency Analyses: An Application to Norwegian Electricity Networks.” Competition and Regulation in Network Industries16(3): 260-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359171501600303.
WangH.-J. (2003). “A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Financing Constraints on Investment: The Case of Financial Liberalization in Taiwan.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics21: 406-419. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288619016.
35.
WangH.-J.HoC.W. (2010). “Estimating Fixed-Effect Panel Stochastic Frontier Models by Model Transformation.” Journal of Econometrics157(2): 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeconom.2009.12.006.
36.
YuW.JamasbT.PollittM. (2009). “Willingness-to-Pay for Quality of Service: An Application to Efficiency Analysis of the UK Electricity Distribution Utilities.” The Energy Journal30(4): 1-48. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No4-1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
