The spatial and temporal variability of renewable generation has important economic implications for electric sector investments and system operations. This study describes a method for selecting representative hours to preserve key distributional requirements for regional load, wind, and solar time series with a two-orders-of-magnitude reduction in dimensionality. We describe the implementation of this procedure in the US-REGEN model and compare impacts on energy system decisions with more common approaches. The results demonstrate how power sector modeling and capacity planning decisions are sensitive to the representation of intra-annual variation and how our proposed approach outperforms simple heuristic selection procedures with lower resolution. The representative hour approach preserves key properties of the joint underlying hourly distributions, whereas seasonal average approaches over-value wind and solar at higher penetration levels and under-value investment in dispatchable capacity by inaccurately capturing the corresponding residual load duration curves.
BistlineJ.E. (2017). “Economic and technical challenges of flexible operations under large-scale variable renewable deployment.” Energy Economics64: 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.012.
BlanfordG.J.MerrickJ.H.YoungD. (2014). “A clean energy standard analysis with the US-REGEN model.” The Energy Journal35: 137-164.
4.
CollinsS.DeaneJ.PPonceletK.PanosE.PietzckerR.C.DelarueE.GallachoirB.P. (2017). “Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews76: 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.rser.2017.03.090.
5.
De SisternesF.J.JenkinsJ.D.BotterudA. (2016). “The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector.” Applied Energy175: 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.014.
6.
De SisternesF.J.WebsterM.D.Perez-ArriagaI.J. (2015). “The impact of bidding rules on electricity markets with intermittent renewables.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems30(3): 1603-1613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TP-WRS.2014.2355775.
7.
EdenhoferO., (2013). “On the economics of renewable energy sources.” Energy Economics40: S12-S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015.
8.
Energy Information Administration (2015). “Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with Projections to 2040.” Energy Information Administration (EIA, Washington, DC).
9.
Energy Information Administration (2014). “The Electricity Market Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation 2014.” Energy Information Administration (EIA, Washington, DC).
10.
Environmental Protection Agency (2010). “Documentation for Integrated Planning Model (IPM) Base Case v.4.10.” Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, Washington, DC).
11.
Electric Power Research Institute (2017). “US-REGEN Model Documentation.” EPRI Technical Update #3002010956 (EPRI, Palo Alto, CA).
12.
Electric Power Research Institute (2015). “US-REGEN Unit Commitment Model Documentation.” EPRI Technical Update #3002004748 (EPRI, Palo Alto, CA).
13.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2010). “FERC Form 714 Part III Schedule 2.” (FERC, Washington, DC).
14.
FrippM.WiserR.H. (2008). “Effects of temporal wind patterns on the value of wind-generated electricity in California and the Northwest.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems323: 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.919427.
15.
GrubbM.J. (1991). “Value of variable sources on power systems.” Generation, Transmission and Distribution IEE Proceedings C138: 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-c.1991.0018.
16.
HowellsM.RognerH.StrachanN.HeapsC.HuntingtonH.KypreosS.HughesA.SilveiraS.DeCarolisJ.Bazil-lianM.RoehrlA. (2011). “OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System an introduction to its ethos, structure and development.” Energy Policy39: 5850-5870. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2011.06.033.
17.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014). “Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
18.
JuddK. (1999). “NumericalMethods in Economics.” MIT Press.
19.
LamontA. (2008). “Assessing the long-term system value of intermittent electric generation technologies.” Energy Economics30: 1208-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.02.007.
20.
LudigS.HallerM.SchmidE.BauerN. (2011). “Fluctuating renewables in a long-term climate change mitigation strategy.” Energy36(11): 6674-6685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.021.
21.
MantzosL.WiesenthalT. (2016). “POTEnCIA Model Description.” JRC Technical Reports.
22.
MerrickJ. (2016). “On representation of temporal variability in electricity capacity planning models.” Energy Economics59: 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.08.001.
23.
MunozF.MillsA. (2015). “Endogenous assessment of the capacity value of solar PV in generation investment planning studies.” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy6(4): 1574-1585. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2015.2456019.
24.
NahmmacherP.SchmidE.HirthL.KnopfB. (2016). “Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling.” Energy112: 430-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.081.
25.
NelsonJ.JohnstonJ.MilevaA.FrippM.HoffmanI.Petros-GoodA.BlancoC.KammenD. (2012). “High-resolu-tion modeling of the western North American power system demonstrates low-cost and low-carbon futures.” Energy Policy43: 436-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.031.
26.
NicolosiM.MillsA.WiserR. (2011). “The Importance of High Temporal Resolution in Modeling Renewable Energy Penetration Scenarios.” LBNL-4197E (LBNL, Berkeley, CA).
27.
PinaA.SilvaC.P FerraoP (2011). “Modeling hourly electricity dynamics for policy making in long-term scenarios.” Energy Policy39(9): 4692-4702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.062.
28.
PonceletK.HoschleH.DelarueE.ViragA.D’haeseleerW. (2016). “Selecting representative days for capturing the implications of integrating intermittent renewables in generation expansion planning problems.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems32(3): 1936-1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2596803.
29.
RogersD.F.PlanteR.D.WongR.T.EvansJ.R. (1991). “Aggregation and disaggregation techniques and methodology in optimization.” Operations Research39(4): 553-582. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.39A553.
30.
SantenN.BistlineJ.BlanfordG.de la ChesnayeF. (2017). “Systems Analysis in Electric Power Sector Modeling: A Review of the Recent Literature and Capabilities of Selected Capacity Planning Models.” EPRI Technical Update #3002011102 (EPRI, Palo Alto, CA).
31.
SullivanP.EurekK.MargolisR. (2014). “Advanced Methods for Incorporating Solar Energy Technologies into Electric Sector Capacity-Expansion Models: Literature Review and Analysis.” NREL/TP-6A20-61185(NREL, Golden, CO). https://doi.org/10.2172/1144823.
32.
SwiderD.J.WeberC. (2007). “The costs of wind’s intermittency in Germany: Application of a stochastic electricity market model.” European Transactions on Electrical Power17: 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.125.
33.
TrainK. (2009). “Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation.” Cambridge University Press, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271.
34.
UeckerdtF., (2015). “Representing power sector variability and the integration of variable renewables in long-term energy-economy models using residual load duration curves.” Energy90(2): 1799-1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener-gy.2015.07.006.
35.
Van der Weijde, A.H. and B.F. Hobbs (2012). “The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty.” Energy Economics34(6): 2089-2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.015.
36.
WogrinS.GalballyD.RenesesJ. (2016). “Optimizing storage operations in medium- and long-term power systems models.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems31(4): 3129-3138. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2471099.
37.
WogrinS.DuenasP.DelgadilloA.RenesesJ. (2014). “A new approach to model load levels in electric power systems with high renewable penetration.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems29(5): 2210-2218. https://doi.org/10.1109/TP-WRS.2014.2300697.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
