Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper analyses recent energy intensity trends for 40 major economies using a structural decomposition analysis. Our focus lies on the question whether improvements in energy intensity were caused by structural change towards a greener economy or by technological improvements. We account for intersectoral trade by using the World Input-Output database and adjust sectoral energy use via the environmentally extended input-output analysis. We find strong differences between consumption and production-based energy consumption across sectors, particularly in the construction and electricity industry. Using the three factor Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index method, our decomposition analysis shows that recent energy intensity reductions were mostly driven by technological advances. Structural changes within countries played only a minor role, whereas international trade by itself even increased global energy intensity. Compared to a previous study only using production-based sectoral energy data, we find structural effects on energy intensity reductions to be systematically weaker under consumption-based data.

Keywords

Energy Intensity Logarithmic mean Divisia Index Decomposition WIOD Database Leontief Inverse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Aghion

Bursztyn

Hemous

(2012). “The Environment and Directed Technical Change,” American Economic Review 102(1): 131-166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.L131.

Ang

B.W.

Choi

K.H.

(1997). “Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emission Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method,” The Energy Journal 18(3): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol18-No3-3.

Ang

B.W.

Lui

(2001). “A New Energy Decomposition Method: Perfect in Decomposition and Consistent in Aggregation,” Energy 26: 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00022-6.

Ang

B.W.

Lui

(2007). “Energy Decomposition Analysis: IEA Model versus other Methods,” Energy Economics 35: 1426-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2006.04.020.

Ayres

R. U.

van den Bergh

J.C.J.M.

Lindenberger

Warr

(2013). “The Underestimated Contribution of Energy to Economic Growth,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 27: 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.07.004.

Babiker

M.H.

(2005). “Climate Change Policy, Market Structure, and Carbon Leakage,” Journal of International Economics 65: 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjinteco.2004.01.003.

Bowen

Fankhauser

(2011). “The Green Growth Narrative: Paradigm Shift or Just Spin,” Global Environmental Change 21(4): 1157-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.007.

Buera

Kaboski

(2012). “The Rise of the Service Economy,” American Economic Review 102(6): 2540-2569. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer. 102.6.2540.

Chappe

(2015). “The Legal Framework of Global Environment Governance on Climate Change: A Critical Survey.” The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming 603-638.

10.

Cole

M. A.

Elliott

J.R.

Shimamoto

(2005). “A Note on Trends in European Industrial Pollution Intensities: A Divisia Index Approach.” The Energy Journal 26(3): 61-73. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No3-3.

11.

Croner

Frankovic

(2016). “A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global and National Energy Intensity Trend,” TU Vienna Working Paper 8.

12.

Dietzenbacher

Los

Stehrer

Timmer

de Vries

G.J.

(2013). “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production,” Review of International Economics 23(3): 575-605.

13.

Eichengreen

Guptay

(2013). “The Two Waves of Service Sector Growth,” Oxford Economic Papers 65: 96-123. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr059.

14.

Gently

(2012). “Final Database of Environmental Satellite Accounts: Technical Reports on their Compilation,” WIOD Deliverable 4.6. http://www.wiod.org/new_site/database/eas.htm

15.

Hoekstra

van den Bergh

J.J.C.J.M.

(2003). “Comparing Structural and Index Decomposition Analysis,” The Energy Journal 18(3): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00059-2.

16.

Huntingtion

H. G.

(2010). “Structural Change and U.S. Energy Use: Recent Patterns.” The Energy Journal 31(3): 25-40.

17.

Jakob

Marschinski

(2013). “Interpreting Trade-Related CO2 Emission Transfers.” Nature Climate Change 3: 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1630.

18.

Jos

O.G.J.

Janssens-Maenhout

Muntean

Peters

J.A.H.W.

(2015). “Trends in Global CO2 Emissions: 2015 Report.” PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 1803.

19.

Leontief

W.W.

(1936). “Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 18(3): 105-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927837.

20.

Leontief

W.W.

(1970). “Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 52(3): 262-271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926294.

21.

Metcalf

G. E.

(2008). “An Empirical Analysis of Energy Intensity and Its Determinants at the State Level.” The Energy Journal 29(3): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No3-1.

22.

Miller

R.E.

(2009). “Input-Output Analysis,” Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09780511626982.

23.

Mulder

(2009). “International Specialization, Sector Structure and the Evolution of Manufacturing Energy Intensity in OECD Countries.” The Energy Journal 36(3): 111-136.

24.

OECD (2013). “What have we learned from attempts to introduce green-growht policies?” OECD Green Growth Papers.

25.

Peters

G.P.

Minx

J.C.

Weber

C.L.

Edenhofer

(2011). “Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 108(1): 8903-8908. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006388108.

26.

Ang

B.W.

(2012). “Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments,” Energy Economics 34(1): 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.009.

27.

Sun

J.W.

(1999). “Decomposition of Aggregate CO2 Emissions in the OECD: 1960-1995.” The Energy Journal 20(3): 147155. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol20-No3-7.

28.

The World Bank (2016). “World Development Indicators,” The World Bank Washington D.C.. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator

29.

Timmer

Erumban

A.A.

Los

Stehrer

de Vries

G.J.

(2014). “Slicing Up Global Value Chains,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(2): 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.99.

30.

Timmer

Dietzenbacher

Los

Stehrer

de Vries

G.J.

(2015). “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production,” Review of International Economics 23(3): 575-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178.

31.

Voigt

Cian

E. D.

Schymura

Verdolini

and E.

(2014). “Energy intensity developments in 40 major economies: Structural change or technology improvement?” Energy Economics 41: 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.015.

32.

Wachsmann

Wood

Lenzen

Schaeffer

(2009). “Structural Decomposition of Energy Use in Brazil from 1970 to 1996.” Applied Energy 86(4): 578-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.003.

33.

Wirl

Yegorov

(2015). “Renewable Energy: Models, Implications and Prospects.” The Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming 349-375.

34.

Wood

(2009). “Structural Decomposition Analysis of Australia’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Energy Policy 37(11): 4943-4948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.060.

35.

Dietzenbacher

(2014). “A Structural Decomposition analysis of the emissions embodied in trade.” Ecological Economics 101: 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.015.

36.

Zhong

(2016). “Energy Consumption, Energy Intensity and Economic Development between 1995 and 2009: A Structural Decomposition Approach.” UNU-MERIT Working Paper

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global and NationalEnergy Intensity Trends

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material