Whether commercial real estate market participants effectively evaluate building energy efficiency characteristics in the absence of a green label has so far remained unaddressed in the literature. I estimate the energy efficiency premium in unlabeled office buildings by exploiting variation in mandatory building energy standard implementations as a result of the 1992 U.S. Energy Policy Act. A more stringent energy code leads to rent and price premiums of approximately 4 percent and 9 percent, respectively. Heterogeneity in the rent premium is also observed based on who pays the utility bills, as would be expected if market participants correctly evaluate energy conservation characteristics. The rent and price premiums are consistent with full capitalization of the energy savings from a more stringent standard.
AllcottH. (2013). The welfare effects of misperceived product costs: Data and calibrations from the automobile market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy5(3): 30-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.3.30.
2.
AllcottH.GreenstoneM. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap?Journal of Economic Perspectives26, 3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.1.3.
3.
AllcottH.WoznyN. (2014). Gasoline prices, fuel economy, and the energy paradox. Review of Economics and Statistics96(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00419.
4.
BarnowB.CainG.GoldbergerA. (1980). Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias. In StromsdorferE.FarkasG. (Eds.), Evaluation Studies42-59. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
5.
BCAP (2015). Building codes assistance project. http://bcap-energy.org/.
6.
BlumsteinC.KriegB.SchipperL.YorkC. (1980). Overcoming social and institutional barriers to energy conservation. Energy5, 355-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(80)90036-5.
7.
BollingerC. R.IhlanfeldtK. R.BowesD. R. (1998). Spatial variation in office rents within the Atlanta region. Urban Studies35(7): 1097-1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0042098984501.
8.
BOMA (2011). Boma’s 2011 experience exchange report. Building Operators and Managers Association, Washington, D.C.
9.
CortK.BelzerD.HalvorsenM.RichmanE.WiniarskiD. (2002). Analysis of potential benefits and costs of adopting ashrae standard 90.1-1999 as a commercial building energy code in Michigan. Report PNNL-14017, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Department of EnergyQuantifying A.
10.
DellaVignaS. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature47(2): 315372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315.
11.
Department of Energy (2010). Measuring State Energy Code Compliance. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Information Center, Washington, D.C.
12.
Department of Energy (2013). Arkansas energy code certification letter. http://Eusa.gov/1oN6b2U. Accessed July22, 2014.
13.
DurantonG.OvermanH. G. (2005). Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. Review of Economic Studies72(4): 1077-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00362.
14.
EIA (2012). Commercial building energy consumption survey. Energy Information Administration.
15.
EichholtzP.KokN.QuigleyJ. M. (2010). Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings. American Economic Review100(5): 2494-2511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.5.2492.
16.
EichholtzP.KokN.QuigleyJ. M. (2013). The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics (1): 50-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00291.
17.
EPA (2003). Energy star -the power to protect the environment through energy efficiency. Environmental Protection Agency.
18.
EPA (2009). Energy efficiency program administrators and building energy codes. Environmental Protection Agency, http://1.usa.gov/d4xr71.
19.
GaluppoL. A.TuC. (2010). Capital markets and sustainable real estate: What are the perceived risks and barriers?Journal of Sustainable Real Estate2(1): 143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80013-0.
20.
GillinghamK.HardingM.RapsonD. (2012). Split incentives in household energy consumption. The Energy Journal33(2): 37-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.3.
21.
GillinghamK.PalmerK. (2014). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Insights for policy from economic theory and empirical analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy8(1): 18-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/ret021.
22.
GlaeserE. L.KahnM. (2004). Sprawl and urban growth. In HendersonJ.ThisseJ. (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 2481-2527.
23.
HahnR.MetcalfeR. (2016). The impact of behavioral science experiments on energy policy. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.5.2.rhah.
24.
HeckmanJ. J.IchimuraH.ToddP. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies64(4): 605-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2971733.
25.
ImbensG.WooldridgeJ. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature47(1): 5-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.L5.
26.
JacobsenG. D.KotchenM. J. (2013). Are building codes effective at saving energy? evidence from residential billing data in Florida. Review of Economics and Statistics95(1): 34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00243.
27.
JaffeA. B.StavinsR. (1994). The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology. Resource and Energy Economics16, 91-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0928-7655(94)90001-9.
28.
LangR. E. (2003). Edgeless Cities. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
29.
MatsonN. E.PietteM. A. (2005). Review of California and national benchmarking methods. Report No. 57364, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
30.
MilgromP. (2008). What the seller won’t tell you: Persuasion and disclosure in markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives22, 115-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.115.
31.
MyersE. (2014). Asymmetric Information in Residential Rental Markets: Implications for the Energy Efficiency Gap. Energy Institute at Haas Working Paper 246.
32.
NewellR.SiikamakiJ. (2014). Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists1(4): 555-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679281.
33.
NovanK.SmithA. (2015, December). The Incentive to Overinvest in Energy Efficiency: Evidence From Hourly SmartMeter Data. Working Paper.
34.
OberleK.SlobodaM. (2010). The importance of ‘greening’ your commercial lease. Real Estate Issues35, 32-41.
35.
PapineauM. (2016). Setting the standard? A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of building energy standards. Working Paper.
36.
PrindleB.CrossleyD.WyattG.HughesJ.TakahashiM.WorrellE.JoosenS.de VisserE.HarmelinkM.BjorndalenJ.BuggeJ.SathayeJ. A.MurtishawS. (2007). Quantifying the effects of market failures in the end-use of energy. International Energy Agency, OECD.
37.
ReedJ. H.JohnsonK.RigertJ.OhA. D. (2004). Who plays and who decides: The structure and operation of the commercial building market. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs. Rockville, MD: Innovologie, LLC.
38.
RubinD. B. (1986). Which ifs have causal answers. Journal of the American Statistical Association81(396): 961-962.
39.
StavinsR.SchatzkiT.BorckJ. (2013). An economic perspective on building labeling policies. Analysis Group Inc.
40.
US Census (2010). Percent distribution of new privately owned residential buildings completed in permit-issuing places in 2010 by number of months from start. http://www.census.gov.
41.
USGBC (2009). Green Building Design and Construction. U.S. Green Building Council.
42.
WoodJ. B.DiSciulloA. M. (1995). Negotiating and Drafting Office Leases. Law Journal Seminars Press, New York, NY.
43.
ZivinJ. G.NovanK. (2016). Upgrading Efficiency and Behavior: Electricity Savings from Residential Weatherization Programs. The Energy Journal37(4): 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.4jziv.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
