This paper introduces a panel threshold model to empirically estimate the main drivers of electricity performance. The empirical analysis is based on a panel data set including 30 OECD countries over the period 1975-2013. We argue that effective regulatory reforms have positive interaction with the electricity generated leading to a higher capacity utilization and an increase in the level of labor productivity of the sector. The threshold analysis suggests that for already economically liberalised countries the level of economic freedom does not affect electricity generation and subsequently the level of electricity performance. Finally, the results do not drastically change when the Renewable Energy Sources (RES) are taken into account.
AkkemikK. Ali.FuatOguz (2011). “Regulation, Efficiency and Equilibrium: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Liberalization in the Turkish Electricity Market,” Energy36(5): 3282-3292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.024.
2.
BaconR.W.Besant-JonesJ. E.. (2001). “Global Electric Power Reform, Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Developing Countries,” Annual Reviews of Energy and the Environment26: 331-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.331.
3.
BernsteinM.AGriffinJ. (2005). “Regional Differences in Price-Elasticity of Demand for Energy,” The Rand Corporation Technical Report, A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
4.
Bernardo.BortolottiFantiniMarcellaSiniscalcoDomenic (1998). “Regulation and Privatization: The Case of Electricity.” Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Working Paper, Department of Economics and Finance, Turin: University of Turin.
5.
FredrikCarlssonLundstromSusanna (2002). “Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects,” Public Choice112 (3/4): 335-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019968525415.
6.
Del BoChiaraFlorioMario (2012). “Electricity Investment: An Evaluation of the New British Energy Policy and its Implications for the European Union,” Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan, Working Paper no 2012-15, April.
7.
ConwayPaulNicolettiGiuseppe (2006). “Product Market Regulation in the Non-Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights,” OECD Economics Department, Working Papers 530, OECD Publishing.
8.
CubbinJ.SternJ. (2006). “The Impact of Regulatory Governance and Privatization on Electricity Industry Generation Capacity in Developing Economies.” World Bank Economic Review, 20 (1): 115-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhj004.
9.
ErdogduErkan. (2011). “What Happened to Efficiency in Electricity Industries After Reforms?” Energy Policy39 (10): 6551-6560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.059.
10.
HarrisonFellLiShanjunPaulAnthony (2014). “A New Look at Residential Electricity Demand Using Household Expenditure Data” International Journal of Industrial Organization33: 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.001.
11.
Carlo, Vittorio.FiorioFlorioMassimoDoronzoRaffaele (2007). “The Electricity Industry Reform Paradigm in the European Union: Testing the Impact on Consumers”. Working Paper. Berkley Electronic Press, 231-244.
12.
FiorioCarloFlorioMassimo (2013). “Electricity Prices and Public Ownership: Evidence From the EU15 Over Thirty Years,” Energy Economics39: 222-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.005.
13.
FlorioMassimo. (2012). “Network Industries and Social Welfare. The Experiment that Reshuffled European Utilities”. Universita degli Studi di Milano, preprint (with the UPP Milan Team)
14.
GutierrezLuisBergSanford (2000). “Telecommunications Liberalization and Regulatory Governance: Lessons from Latin America,” Telecommunications Policy24 (10-11): 865-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00069-0.
15.
GwartneyJamesHallJoshuaLawsonRobert (2012). “Economic Freedom of the World: 2012 Annual Report” Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute.
16.
HansenBruce. (1999). “Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics93 (2): 345-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1.
HeniszW.J. (2000). “The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization16(2): 334-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/16.2.334.
19.
HondroyiannisGeorgeLolos.SarantisPapapetrouEvangelia (2002). “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Assessing the Evidence from Greece,” Energy Economics24 (4): 319-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00006-3.
20.
International Energy Agency (2004). “Renewable Energy - Market and Policy Trends in IEA countries.” IEA, Paris.
21.
Tooraj.JamasbPollittMichael (2005). “Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization and Integration” The Energy Journal, 26 (Special Issue): 11-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol26-nosi-2.
22.
KourtellosAndrosStengosThanasisTanChih Ming (2015). “Structural Threshold Regression,” Econometric Theory, 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266466615000067.
23.
Chien-ChiangLeeChangChun-Ping (2008). “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Asian Economies: A More Comprehensive Analysis Using Panel Data,” Resource and Energy Economics30(1): 50-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.03.003.
24.
LeibensteinHarvey. (1966). “Allocative Efficiency versus X-efficiency”. American Economic Review, 56(3): 392-415.
25.
LittlechildStephen. (2001). “Competition and Regulation in the U.K. Electricity Industry (With A Brief Look At California),” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(4): 21-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00424.x.
26.
Emmanuel.MamatzakisKalyvas.AntoniosPiesseJenifer (2013). “Does Regulation in Credit, Labour and Business Matter for Bank Performance in the EU-10 Economies?” International Journal of the Economics of Business20 (3):341385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2013.835981.
27.
Paresh.NarayanSmythRussel (2007). “Are Shocks to Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from 182 Countries,” Energy Policy351 (1): 333-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.027.
28.
LionelNesta.Vona.FranscescoNicolliFranscesco (2014). “Environmental Policies, Competition and Innovation in Renewable Energy,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management67 (3): 396-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001.
29.
NewberyDavid. (2002). “Privatization, Restructuring and Regulation of Network Utilities,” Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
30.
Ozturk Ilhan. (2010). “A Literature Survey on Energy-Growth Nexus,” Energy Policy38 (1): 340-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024.
31.
PayneJames (2010). “A Survey of the Electricity Consumption-Growth Literature,” AppliedEnergy87 (3): 723-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.034.
32.
PolemisMichael. (2006) “Empirical Assessment of the Determinants of Road Energy Demand in Greece,” Energy Economics28 (3): 385-03. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.01.007.
33.
PolemisMichael. (2007). “Modeling Industrial Energy Demand in Greece Using Cointegration Techniques,” Energy Policy35 (8): 4039-4050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.007.
34.
Michael.PolemisDagoumasAthanasios (2013). “The Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus: Evidence from Greece,” Energy Policy62: 798-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.086.
35.
PolemisMichael. (2016). “New Evidence on the Impact of Structural Reforms on Electricity Sector Performance,” Energy Policy92: 420-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.032.
36.
PollittMichael. (2009). “Electricity Liberalisation in the European Union: A Progress Report.” Cambridge Working Paper in Economics No. 0953.
37.
PollittMichael. (2012). “Lessons from the History of Independent System Operators in the Energy Sector,” Energy Policy47(C): pages 32-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.007.
38.
PollittMichaelBrophy HaneyAoife. (2013). “Dismantling a Competitive Electricity Sector: The U.K.’s Electricity Market Reform,” The Electricity Journal27 (10): 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2013.11.001.
39.
PompeiFabrizio. (2013). “Heterogeneous Effects of Regulation on the Efficiency of the Electricity Industry Across European Union Countries”. Energy Economics 40: 569-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.008.
40.
RosAgustin. (1999). “Does Ownership or Competition Matter? The Effects of Telecommunications Reform on Network Expansion and Efficiency,” Journal of Regulatory Economics: 15(1): 65-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008048924876.
41.
I.RutledgeWrightP. (2010). UK Energy Policy and the End of Market Fundamentalism, Oxford University Press.
42.
Nathaniel.SchenkerTaylorJeremy M.G. (1996). “Partially Parametric Techniques for Multiple Imputation,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 22 (4): 425—446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(95)00057-7.
43.
SteinerFaye. (2001). “Regulation, Industry Structure and Performance in the Electricity Supply Industry.” OECD Economic Studies, 32: 143-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2001-art5-en.
44.
WallstenScott. (2001). “An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization, and Regulation in Africa and Latin America,” Journal of Industrial Economics40(1): 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00135.
45.
WillisL.H. (2004). Power Distribution Planning Reference Book, Second Edition, Marcel Dekker Inc Press, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420030310.
46.
Yin-Fang.ZhangParker.DavidKirkpatrickColin (2005). “Competition, Regulation and Privatization of Electricity Generation in Developing Countries: Does the Sequencing of the Reforms Matter?” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance54(2-3): 358-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.009.
47.
Yin-Fang.ZhangParker.DavidKirkpatrickColin (2008). “Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries: An Econometric Assessment of the Effects of Privatization, Competition and Regulation,” Journal of Regulatory Economics33 (2): 159-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9039-7.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
