Electricity customers who install solar panels often are paid the prevailing retail price for the electricity they generate. We demonstrate that this rate of compensation typically is not optimal. A payment for distributed generation (w) that is below the retail price of electricity (r) often will induce the welfare-maximizing level of distributed generation (DG) when the fixed costs of centralized electricity production and the network management costs of accommodating intermittent solar DG are large, and when centralized generation and DG produce similar (pollution) externalities. w can optimally exceed r under alternative conditions. The optimal DG compensation policy varies considerably as industry conditions change. Furthermore, a requirement to equate w and r can reduce aggregate welfare substantially and can generate pronounced distributional effects.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (2014). Distributed Generation (http://www.aceee.org/topics/distributed-generation), visitedSeptember21, 2014.
2.
American Public Power Association (2013). Distributed Generation: An Overview of Recent Policy and Market Developments, Washington, DC (http://www.publicpower.org/files/PDFs/Distributed%20Generation-Nov2013.pdf).
3.
BaumolW.BradfordD. (1970). “Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing.” American Economic Review60(3): 265-283.
4.
BernsteinM.GriffinJ. (2006). “Regional Differences in the Price-Elasticity of Demand for Energy.” Rand Corporation Report NREL/SR-620-39512 prepared for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39512.pdf). http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/877655.
5.
BohiD.ZimmermanM.B. (1984). “An Update on Econometric Studies of Energy Demand Behavior.” Annual Review of Energy9: 105-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.09.110184.000541.
6.
BorensteinS. (2014). “What’s So Great about Fixed Charges?” Energy Institute at Haas(https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/whats-so-great-about-fixed-charges).
7.
BorensteinS. (2015). “Private Net Benefits of Residential Solar PV: The Role of Electricity Tariffs, Tax Incentives, and Rebates.” UC Berkeley Working Paper Series(http://ei.haas.berkeley.edu/research/papers/WP259.pdf). http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w21342.
8.
BrankerK.PathakM.PearceJ.. (2011). “A Review of Solar Photovoltaic Levelized Cost of Electricity.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews15(9): 4470-4482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104.
9.
BrownD.SappingtonD.. (2016) “Technical Appendix to Accompany ‘Designing Compensation for Distributed Solar Generation: Is Net Metering Ever Optimal?’.” (https://uofa.ualberta.ca/arts/about/people-collection/david-brown).
10.
BushnellJ. (2007). “Oligopoly Equilibria in Electricity Contract Markets.” Journal of Regulatory Economics32(3): 225-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-007-9031-2.
11.
BushnellJ.MansurE.SaraviaC.. (2008). “Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured US Electricity Markets.” American Economic Review98(1): 237-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.237.
12.
California Energy Commission (2015). “Electricity Generation Capacity &Energy.” California Energy Almanac(http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/electric_generation_capacity.html), visitedSeptember10, 2015.
13.
California Independent System Operator (2015a). Open Access Same-time Information System (http://oasis.caiso.com), visitedSeptember15, 2015.
14.
California Independent System Operator (2015b). Renewables Watch: Reports and Data (http://www.caiso.com/market/Pages/ReportsBulletins/DailyRenewablesWatch.aspx).
15.
California Public Utilities Commission (2015). Utility Tariff Information (http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Electric + Rates/utiltariffs/index.htm), visitedOctober12, 2015.
16.
California Solar Statistics (2015). Geographical Statistics (https://www.californiasolarstatistics.ca.gov/reports/locale_stats), visitedSeptember10, 2015.
17.
CardwellD. (2012). “Solar Panel Payments Set Off a Fairness Debate.” The New York Times, June 4 (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/05/business/solar-payments-set-off-a-fairness-debate.html?_r=0).
18.
CohenM.KauzmannP.CallawayD. (2015). “Economic Effects of Distributed PV Generation on California’s Dis- tribution System.” Energy Institute at Haas Working Paper 260(http://ei.haas.berkeley.edu/research/papers/WP260.pdf).
19.
CoutureT.GagnonY. (2010). “An Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Remuneration Models: Implications for Renewable Energy Investment.” Energy Policy38(2): 955-965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.047.
20.
DarghouthN.BarboseG.WiserR. (2011). “The Impact of Rate Design and Net Metering on the Bill Savings from Distributed PV for Residential Customers in California.” Energy Policy39(9): 5243-5253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.040.
21.
DarghouthN.BarboseG.WiserR. (2014). “Customer-Economics of Residential Photovoltaic Systems (Part 1): The Impact of High Renewable Energy Penetrations on Electricity Bill Savings with Net Metering.” Energy Policy67: 290-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.042.
22.
EidC.GuillenJ.R.MarnP.F.HakvoortR. (2014). “The Economic Effect of Electricity Net-Metering with Solar PV: Consequences for Network Cost Recovery, Cross Subsidies and Policy Objectives.” Energy Policy75: 244-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.011.
23.
EspeyJ.EspeyM. (2004). “Turning on the Lights: A Meta-Analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics36(1): 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800021866.
24.
FarrellJ. (2014). “Minnesota’s Value of Solar: Can a Northern State’s New Solar Policy Defuse Distributed Generation Battles?” Institute for Local Self-Reliance Report(http://www.ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/MN-Value-of-Solar- from-ILSR.pdf).
25.
FaruquiA.HledikR. (2015). “An Evaluation of SRP’s Electric Rate Proposal for Residential Customers with Distributed Generation.” The Brattle Group Report Prepared for Salt River Project(http://www.srpnet.com/prices/priceprocess/pdfx/DGRateReview.pdf).
26.
GordonK.OlsonW.NietoA. (2006). “Responding to EPAct 2005: Looking at Smart Meters for Electricity, Time-Based Rate Structures, and Net Metering.” Report prepared for the Edison Electric Institute(http://sites.energetics.com/MADRI/pdfs/responding_to_epact.pdf).
27.
Institute for Electric Efficiency (2014). Utility-Scale Smart Meter Deployments, Building Block of the Evolving Power Grid (http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iei/Documents/IEI_SmartMeterUpdate_0914.pdf).
28.
ItoK. (2014). “Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing.” American Economic Review104(2): 537-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.537.
29.
KindP. (2013). “Disruptive Challenges: Financial Implications and Strategic Responses to a Changing Retail Electric Business.” Report prepared for the Edison Electric Institute(http://www.eei.org/ourissues/finance/Documents/disruptivechallenges.pdf).
30.
KingC.ChatterjeeS. (2003). “Predicting California Demand Response: How do Consumers React to Hourly Price?” Public Utilities Fortnightly141(13): 27-32.
31.
KuangH.LiS.WuZ. (2011). “Discussion on Advantages and Disadvantages of Distributed Generation Connected to the Grid.” International Conference Proceedings on Electrical and Control Engineering(http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6057500&tag=1).
32.
LinvillC.ShenotJ.LazarJ. (2013). Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well: Fair Compensation in a Time of Transition. The Regulatory Assistance Project (www.raponline.org).
33.
London Economics International (2013). “Estimating the Value of Lost Load.” Briefing Paper Prepared for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas(http://www.ercot.com/content/gridinfo/resource/2015/mktanalysis/ERCOT_Valueof LostLoad_LiteratureReviewandMacroeconomic.pdf).
34.
MansurE. (2008). “Measuring Welfare in Restructured Electricity Markets.” Review of Economics and Statistics90(2): 369-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.2.369.
35.
Minnesota Department of Commerce (2014). Minnesota Value of Solar: Methodology. Division of Energy Resources Report (https://mn.gov/commerce/energy/images/MN-VOS-Methodology-FINAL.pdf).
36.
NarayanP.SmythR. (2005). “The Residential Demand For Electricity in Australia: An Application of the Bounds Testing Approach to Cointegration.” Energy Policy33(4): 467-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.011.
37.
North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (NCCETC) (2014). Rethinking Standby &Fixed Charges: Regulatory &Rate Design Pathways to Deeper Solar PV Cost Reductions (http://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/resources/Rethinking-Standby-and-Fixed-Cost-Charges_V2.pdf).
38.
NCCETC (2015a). Personal Tax Credit by State (http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program?type=31&technology=7&).
39.
NCCETC (2015b). Solar Rebate Program by State (http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program?type=88&technology=7&).
40.
NCCETC (2015c). Solar Renewable Energy Credit Program by State (http://programs.dsireusa.org/system/pro-gram?type=85&).
41.
NCCETC (2015d). The 50 States of Solar: A Quarterly Look at America’s Fast-Evolving Distributed Solar Policy &Regulatory Conversation (https://nccleantech.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/The-50-States-of-Solar_FINAL.pdf).
42.
Parsons and Brinckerhoff (2012). Electricity Transmission Costing Study. An Independent Report Endorsed by the Institution of Engineering and Technology (http://renewables-grid.eu/uploads/media/Electricity_Transmission_Costing_Study_ Parsons_Brinckerhoff.pdf).
43.
PaulA.MyersE.PalmerK. (2009). “A Partial Adjustment Model of U.S. Electricity Demand by Region, Season, and Sector.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper RFF DP 08-50(http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-DP-08-50.pdf).
44.
PoullikkasA. (2013). “A Comparative Assessment of Net Metering and Feed in Tariff Schemes for Residential PV Systems.” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments3: 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2013.04.001.
45.
PullerS. (2007). “Pricing and Firm Conduct in California’s Deregulated Electricity Market.” Review of Economics and Statistics89(1): 75-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.75.
46.
RamseyF. (1927). “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation.” Economic Journal37(1): 47-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2222721.
47.
RaskinD. (2013). “The Regulatory Challenge of Distributed Generation.” Harvard Business Law Review Online4: 38-51.
48.
SchneiderJ.SargentR. (2014). “Lighting the Way: The Top Ten States that Helped Drive America’s Solar Energy Boom in 2013.” PennEnvironment Research &Policy Center Report(http://environmentamericacenter.org/sites/environ- ment/files/reports/EA_Lightingtheway_scrn.pdf).
49.
Solar Electric Power Association (2013). Ratemaking, Solar Value, and Solar Net Energy Metering—A Primer (http://www.solarelectricpower.org/media/51299/sepa-nem-report-0713-print.pdf).
50.
TaylorT.SchwarzP.CochellJ. (2005). “24/7 Hourly Response to Electricity Real-Time Pricing with up to Eight Summers of Experience.” Journal of Regulatory Economics27(3): 235-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-6623-6.
51.
ThanK. (2013). “As Solar Power Grows, Dispute Flares Over U.S. Utility Bills.” National Geographic Daily News, December 24 (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2013/12/131226-utilities-dispute-net-metering-for-solar/).
52.
U.S. Federal Energy Commission (FERC) (2014). Price Formation in Organized Wholesale Electricity Markets. Staff Analysis of Energy Offer Mitigation in RTO and ISO Markets, Docket No. AD14-14-000 (https://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2014/AD14-14-mitigation-rto-iso-markets.pdf).
53.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014a). Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program. Table of Fuel and Energy Source: Codes and Emissions Coefficients. EIA Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting (http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/1605/coefficients.html).
54.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014b). State Electricity Profiles. Table 10. Supply and Disposition of Electricity (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/).
55.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015a). “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources.” Annual Energy Outlook(http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf).
56.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015b). Form 826 (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia826).
57.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015c). Detailed State Data (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state).
58.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2013). Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units. EPA-452/R-13-003 (http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/20130920proposalria.pdf).
59.
WadeS. (2003). “Price Responsiveness in the AEO2003 NEMS Residential and Commercial Buildings Sector Models.” Report Prepared for the U.S. Energy Information Administration(http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/elasticity/pdf/buildings.pdf).
60.
WeissmanS.JohnsonN. (2012). The Statewide Benefits of Net-Metering in California &the Consequences of Changes to the Program. Center for Law, Energy &the Environment, University of California (http://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/The_Statewide_Benefits_of_Net-Metering_in_CA_Weissman_and_Johnson.pdf).
61.
World Alliance for Decentralized Energy (2014). Where Can DE be Used? (http://www.localpower.org/deb_where.html), visitedSeptember21, 2014.
62.
YamamotoY. (2012). “Pricing Electricity from Residential Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparison of Feed-in Tariffs, Net Metering, and Net Purchase and Sale.” Solar Energy86(9): 2678-2685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
