We provide a comprehensive framework of analyzing the diffusion process of renewable technology, incorporating epidemic and pecuniary effects. Relying on a panel dataset consisting of information from 1207 CDM wind projects in thirty provinces over the period 2004-2011, we find strong evidence on the dominant role of the epidemic effect and new evidence on pecuniary effects that generate a diminishing marginal effect of profitability in inducing technology adoption.
Our numerical simulation demonstrates that the epidemic effect can play a quantitatively important role in the spread of renewable energy technology and markedly enhance the optimal social welfare. Our findings convey important policy implications for regulators when choosing policy instruments to enhance the diffusion and adoption of clean technology. Price instruments should be complemented by a wide range of non-market instruments to address non-market barriers.
AndrewsD.CriscuoloC.GalP. (2015). “Frontier firms, technology diffusion and public policy: micro evidence from OECD countries”, OECD Mimeo. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrql2q2jj7b-en.
2.
BassF. M. (1969). “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables.” Management Science15(5): 215-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215.
3.
BassF. M. (2004). “Comments on “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables”: The Bass Model.” Management Science50(12): 1833-1840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0300.
4.
BattistiG. (2008). “Innovations and the economics of new technology spreading within and across users: gaps and way forward.” Journal of Cleaner Production16(1, Supplement 1): S22-S31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.018.
5.
BenthemA.v.GillinghamK.SweeneyJ. (2008). “Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California.” The Energy Journal29(3): 131-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol29-no3-7.
6.
BollingerB.GillinghamK. (2012). “Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels.” Marketing Science31(6): 900-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0727.
7.
China Meteorological Administration. (2006).The report of wind energy resource assessment in China, China Meteorological Press.
8.
ColomboM. G.MosconiR. (1995). “Complementarity and Cumulative Learning Effects in the Early Diffusion of Multiple Technologies.” The Journal of Industrial Economics43(1): 13-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2950423.
9.
European Commission (2012). The state of the European carbon market in 2012, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council.
10.
FreemanC. (1987). “Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan.” Pinter, London.
11.
FudenbergD.TiroleJ. (1985). “Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology.” The Review of Economic Studies52(3): 383-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297660.
12.
GeroskiP. A. (2000). “Models of technology diffusion.” Research Policy, 29(4-5), 603-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00092-X.
13.
GordonB. D. (2014). “Peer Effects in Program Participation.” The American Economic Review104(7): 2049-2074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.7.2049.
14.
GourlayA.PentecostE. (2002). “The Determinants of Technology Diffusion: Evidence from the UK Financial Sector.” Manchester School, Vol 70, No 2, p 185-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00291.
15.
HannanT. H.McDowellJ. M. (1987). “Rival Precedence and the Dynamics of Technology Adoption: An Empirical Analysis.” Economica54(214): 155-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2554388.
16.
HeG.KammenD.M. (2014). Where, when and how much wind is available? A provincial-scale wind resource assessment for China. Energy Policy,74,116-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.003.
17.
HoppeH. (2000). Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(2), 315-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00020-4.
18.
HoppeH. (2002). “The timing of new technology adoption: Theoretical models and empirical evidence.” Manchester School, 70(1), 56-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00283.
19.
IRENA (2014). Renewable Energy Prospects: China, REmap 2030 analysis. IRENA, Abu Dhabi. www.irena.org/remap
20.
International Energy Agency (2015). “Energy Technology Perspectives: Mobilizing Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action.” IEA.
21.
Jacob K.BinderM.WieczorekA.(2004). Governance for Industrial Transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Environmental Policy Research Centre: Berlin. pp. 208-236.
22.
KarshenasM.StonemanP. L. (1993). “Rank, Stock, Order, and Epidemic Effects in the Diffusion of New Process Technologies: An Empirical Model.” The RAND Journal of Economics24(4): 503-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2555742.
23.
KerrSuziNewellRichard G. (2003). “Policy Induced Technology Adoption: Evidence from the U.S. Lead Phasedown.” Journal of Industrial Economics51 (3), 317-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00203.
24.
LiuY. (2014). “CDM and national policy: Synergy or conflict? Evidence from the wind power sector in China.” Climate Policy15(6): 767-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.968764.
25.
LundvallB.A.(1992). “National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.” Pinter, London.
26.
MansfieldE. (1963). “The Speed of Response of Firms to New Techniques.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics77(2): 290-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884404.
27.
ManskiCharles F. (1993). “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies60 (3): 531-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2298123.
28.
MetcalfeS. (1995). “The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives.” Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 446.
29.
MulliganJ. G.LlinaresE. (2003). “Market Segmentation and the Diffusion of Quality-Enhancing Innovations: The Case of Downhill Skiing.” The Review of Economics and Statistics85(3): 493-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465303322369678.
30.
NelsonR. (1993). National innovation system: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.
31.
ReinganumJ. F. (1981). “Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology.” The Bell Journal of Economics12(2): 618-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003576.
32.
RosenbergN. (1976). Perspectives on Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561313.
33.
RuP.ZhiQ.ZhangF.ZhongX.LiJ.SuJ. (2012). “Behind the development of technology: The transition of innovation modes in China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry.” Energy Policy43, 58-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.025.
34.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
35.
StonemanP.KwonM. J. (1996). “Technology Adoption and Firm Profitability.” The Economic Journal106(437): 952962. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2235366.
36.
WandR.LeutholdF. (2011). “Feed-in tariffs for photovoltaics: Learning by doing in Germany?” Applied Energy88(12): 4387-4399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.015.
37.
WiserR.YangZ.HandM.HohmeyerO.InfieldD.JensenP. H.NikolaevV.O’MalleyM.SindenG.ZervosA.. (2011). Wind Energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation [O. Ed-enhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151153.011.
38.
YaoX.L.LiuY.QuS.Y. (2015). “When will wind energy achieve grid parity in China?—Connecting technological learning and climate finance.” Applied Energy.160: 697-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.10167j.apenergy.2015.04.094.
39.
ZhuX.AppelquistL.R.HalsnæK. (2008). Report on the comparative assessment of fuel cycle costs and methodological challenges across the participating countries, National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy (RISOE DTU).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
