We investigate shale gas drilling strategies during times oflow oil and gas prices. Producers exhaust their high-productivity locations quickly in times oflow prices, and then adapt their drilling practices to increase the inventory of commercially viable projects. Investment in a new well may be reduced relative to the cost of previously drilled wells in the same location (from now on, original wells) through closer well spacing, use of existing infrastructure, and, perhaps most importantly, use of fewer inputs (e.g., less water and proppant). Inventory of drilling locations is expanded through such infill drilling, which may or may not be economically viable on an individual well basis but which has the potential to increase area recovery and portfolio returns.
AbelA.DixitA.EberlyJ.PindyckR.S. (1996). “Options, the value of capital, and investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics111(3): 753-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2946671.
2.
BrennanM.SchwartzE.S. (1985), “Evaluating natural resource investments,” The Journal of Business58(2): 135-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/296288.
Bureau of Economic Geology (2015). “Shale plays in North America: lessons learned and global implications,” Workshop on shale gas, 38th International Conference of the International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE), Antalya, Turkey.
5.
CovertT. (2014), “Experiential and social learning in firms: the case of hydraulic fracturing in the Bakken Shale,” Working paper, Harvard University, 43 p.
6.
EIA (2011), Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy of Information Administration, 105 p.
7.
EIA (2014), Annual energy outlook 2014 with projections to 2040, D0E/EIA-0383 (2014), U.S. Department of Energy, Energy of Information Administration, 269 p.
8.
EIA (2015), Drilling Productivity Report: For key tight oil and shale gas regions, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 11 p.
9.
FossM. M.WainbergM.QuijanoD., (2015). Upstream Attainment, Producer Challenges. Working paper, Bureau of Economic Geology’s Center for Energy Economics. A summary can be found at http://www.beg.utexas.edu/energyecon/thinkcorner/CEE%20producer%20benchmarks%20part%202.pdf.
10.
GulenG.IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.SmyeK.TinkerS.W. (2015). “Production Scenarios for the Haynesville Shale Play,” SPE Economics and Management, Preprint, 10 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/176022-PA.
GulenG.IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.TinkerS.W. (2013). “Well Economics across Ten Tiers in Low and High Btu Areas, Barnett Shale, Texas.” Energy60: 302-315, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.energy.2013.07.041.
13.
IkonnikovaS.GulenG.BrowningJ.TinkerS.W. (2015a), “Profitability of shale gas drilling: a case study of the Fayetteville Shale play,” Energy81: 382-393, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.051.
14.
IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.GulenG.SmyeK.TinkerS.W. (2015b), “Factors influencing shale gas production forecasting: Empirical studies of Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville, and Marcellus Shale plays.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy4(1): 19-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890A1.siko.
15.
IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.HorvathS.TinkerS.W. (2014). “Well recovery, drainage area, and future drill-well inventory: empirical study of the Barnett Shale gas play.” SPE Res Eval & Eng, 17(4): 484-496, http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171552-PA.
16.
KaiserM. J., 2012, Profitability assessment of Haynesville Shale gas wells, Energy, 38: 315-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.057.
17.
LakeL.MartinJ.RamseyJ.TimanS. (2013). “A primer on the economics of shale gas production.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance25(4):. 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12045.
18.
MaleF.IslamA.PatzekT.IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.MarderM. (2015). “Analysis of gas production from hydraulically fractured wells in the Haynesville Shale using scaling methods,” The Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2015.03.001.
19.
MaleF.PatzekT.YuW.IkonnikovaS.BrowningJ.MarderM.P. (2014). “Analysis of gas production in the Fayetteville Formation using scaling methods,” in SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, April2014, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-168993-MS, 9 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168993-MS.
20.
PatzekT. W.MaleF.MarderM. (2013). “Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory,” PNAS 2013110 (49): 19731-19736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313380110.
21.
PhatakA.KresseO.NevvonenO.V.AbadC.CohenC.LafitteV.EnglandE.K. (2013). “Optimum fluid and proppant selection for hydraulic fracturing in shale gas reservoirs: a parametric study based on fracturing-to-production simulations,” in SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, February2013, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-163876-MS, 18 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163876-MS.
22.
USGS (2012). Variability of distributions of well-scale estimated ultimate recovery for continuous (unconventional) oil and gas resources in the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 20121118.
23.
WoodMackenzie (2014). Unconventional 3.0: a new energy outlook, Industry Report, August2014.
