This paper examines a range of technological and regulatory approaches to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Availability of new technologies will control how the economy and energy infrastructure respond to any future climate policies. How such policies interact with other types of environmental regulations will also influence the best options for meeting emissions goals. To investigate these effects, the ADAGE model is used to examine policy impacts for several climate and technology scenarios, focusing on key factors such as emissions, technology deployment, energy prices and macroeconomic indicators. In general, the simulations indicate that reductions in GHG emissions can be accomplished with limited economic adjustments, although the impacts depend on both the regulatory approaches used and the future availability of new low-carbon technologies.
BabikerM.GurgelA.PaltsevS.ReillyJ. (2008). “A Forward Looking Version of the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model.” Cambridge, MA:: MIT. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt161.pdf
2.
BohringerC. (1998). “The Synthesis of Bottom-up and Top-down in Energy Policy Modeling.” Energy Economics20(3): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00015-7.
3.
BohringerC.RutherfordT.F. (2008). “Combining Bottom-up and Top-down.” Energy Economics30(2): 574-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2007.03.004.
4.
BohringerC.RutherfordT.F. (2009). “Integrated Assessment of Energy Policies: Decomposing Top-down and Bottom-up.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control33: 1648-1661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjedc.2008.12.007.
5.
BovenbergL.A.GoulderL.H. (1996). “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analysis.” American Economic Review86(4): 985-1000.
6.
ElaE. (2009). “Using Economics to Determine the Efficient Curtailment of Wind Energy.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-550-45071, February.
7.
HourcadeJ.JaccardM.BatailleC.GhersiF. (2006). “Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges—Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal.” Energy Journal27: 1-12.
8.
JacobyH.D.ReillyJ.M.McFarlandJ.R.PaltsevS. (2006). “Technology and Technical Change in the MIT EPPA Model.” Energy Economics28(5): 610-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.014.
9.
KarplusV.J.PaltsevS.ReillyJ.M. (2010). “Prospects for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in the United States and Japan: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Transportation Research Part A (44): 620-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.004.
10.
LanzB.RauschS. (2011). “General Equilibrium, Electricity Generation Technologies and the Cost of Carbon Abatement: A Structural Sensitivity Analysis.” Energy Economics33(5): 1035-1037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.003.
11.
MilliganM.PorterK. (2008). “Determining the Capacity Value of Wind: An Updated Survey of Methods and Implementation.” NREL/CP-500-43433 Presented at WindPower 2008, Houston, TX. http://amherstislandwindinfo.com/aiw-docs/milligan-nrel-wind-capacity-value.pdf.
12.
PaltsevS.ReillyJ.M.JacobyH.D.EckausR.S.McFarlandJ.SarofimM.AsadoorianM.BabikerM. (2005). “The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 125.
13.
ParryIan W.H.BentoA.M. (2000). “Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and the ‘Double Dividend’ Hypothesis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management39: 67-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1093.
14.
RauschS.MowersM. (2012). “Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Clean and Renewable Energy Standards for Electricity.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 225.
15.
RossM.T. (2009). “Documentation of the ADAGE Model.” RTI Working Paper #09_01 (http://www.rti.org/adage).
16.
ShortW.SullivanP.MaiT.MowersM.UriarteC.BlairN.HeimillerD.MartinezA. (2011). “Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS).” NREL Report No. TP-6A20-46534. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/46534.pdf). http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1031955.
17.
U..S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011a). “Annual Energy Outlook 2011.” U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA (http://www.eia.gov/analysis/).
18.
U..S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011b). “Assumptions to AEO 2011.” U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA (http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/as-sumptions/index.cfm).
19.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2006). “Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 430-R-06-005, Washington, DC, USA (http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/international.html).
20.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010). “EPA’s IPM Base Case v.4.10.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 430-R-100-10, Washington, DC, USA (http://www.epa.gov/airmarkt/progsregs/epa-ipm/Base-Casev410.html).
