Using data on 61 oil companies from 2001-09, we examine the evolution of revenue efficiency of National Oil Companies (NOCs) and shareholder-owned oil companies (SOCs). We find that NOCs generally are less efficient than SOCs, but their efficiency increased faster over the last decade. We also find evidence that partial privatizations increase operational efficiency, and (weaker) evidence that mergers and acquisitions during the decade tended to increase the efficiency of the merging firms. Finally, we find evidence that much of the inefficiency of NOCs is consistent with the hypothesis that government ownership leads to different firm objectives.
Al-ObaidanA.M.ScullyG. W. (1991). “Effificiency differences between private and state-owned enterprises in the international petroleum industry,” Applied Economics, 23:237-246.
2.
BankerR.D. (1993). “Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation,” Management Science, 39(10): 1256-1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1265.
3.
BatteseG.E.CoelliT.J. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farms in India,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1-2):153169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00158774.
4.
BatteseG.E.CoelliT.J. (1995). “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data,” Empirical Economics, 20:325-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442.
5.
CoelliT.J. (1996a). “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program”, CEPA Working Paper 96/8, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia.
6.
CoelliT.J. (1996b), “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation”, CEPA Working Paper 96/7, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia.
7.
CornwellC.SchmidtP.SicklesR.C. (1990). “Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels,” Journal of Econometrics, 46(1-2): 185-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90054-W.
8.
CooperW.W.ToneK. (1997). “Measures of Inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Estimation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 99(1): 72-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00384-0.
9.
DesaiA.RatickS.J.SchinnarA. P. (2005). “Data envelopment analysis with stochastic variations in data,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 39: 147-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.seps.2004. 01.005.
10.
EllerStacy L.HartleyP. R.MedlockK. B.III (2011). “Empirical evidence on the operational efficiency of National Oil Companies,” Empirical Economics, 40: 623-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0349-8.
11.
GongB.H.SicklesR.C. (1992). “Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontiers and Data Envelopment Analysis Using Panel Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 51(1-2): 259-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90038-S.
12.
GreeneW. (2005). “Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23: 7-32.
13.
GrosskopfS. (1996). “Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7:161-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00157039.
14.
HartleyP.R.MedlockK.B.III (2008). “A Model of the Operation and Development of a National Oil Company,” Energy Economics, 30(5): 2459-2485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2007. 12.017.
15.
KumbhakarS.C.LovellC.A.K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174411.
16.
MetschiesG.P. (2003-2009). International Fuel Prices. Available at http://www.metschies.com/
17.
PittM.LeeL.F. (1981). “The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry,” Journal of Development Economics, 9:715-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3.
18.
RuggieroJ. (2007). “A Comparison of DEA and Stochastic Frontier Model Using Panel Data,” International Transactions in Operational Research, 14(3): 259-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2007.00585.x.
19.
SchmidtK.M. (1996). “The Cost and Benefits of Privatization: an Incomplete Contracts Approach,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12(1): 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjour-nals.jleo.a023354.
20.
SchmidtP.SicklesR.C. (1984). “Production Frontiers and Panel Data,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2(4): 367-374.
21.
TsionasE. G. (2003). “Combining DEA and stochastic frontier models: An empirical Bayes approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 147: 499-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00248-5.
22.
VictorN. M. (2007). “On Measuring the Performance of National Oil Companies (NOCs),” Working Paper #64, PESD, Stanford University.
23.
WolfC.O.H. (2009). “Does Ownership Matter? The Performance and Effificiency of State Oil vs. Private Oil (1987-2006),” Energy Policy, 37: 2642-2652.
24.
WolfC.O.H.PollittM.G. (2008). “Privatising National Oil Companies: Assessing the Impact on Firm Performance,” Cambridge Judge Business School Working Paper No. 02/2008, University of Cambridge.
