This paper examines the effects of market restructuring initiatives that introduced competition into the United States electricity industry on the thermal efficiency of electricity generation. An empirical model is estimated on annual data for over 950 plants from 1996 to 2006. Model estimates show that access to wholesale electricity markets and retail choice together increased the efficiency of investor-owned plants by about nine percent and that these gains stem from organizational and technological changes within the plant. Although not directly targeted by restructuring initiatives, similar efficiency gains are also found for municipality-owned plants. This result suggests that the potential benefits from competition have spilled over to public electricity generation.
BlumsackSethLaveLesterAptJay (2008). “Electricity Prices and Costs Under Regulation and Restructuring.” Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center Working Paper, August.
2.
BohiDouglasPalmerKaren (1996). “The Efficiency of Wholesale vs. Retail Competition in Electricity.” The Electricity Journal9(8): 12-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(96)80431-3.
3.
CabralLuis (1995). “Sunk Costs, Firm Size and Firm Growth.” The Journal of Industrial Economics43(2): 161-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2950479.
4.
Craig DeanJ. (2009). “Causes and Motivations for Market Restructuring: Evidence from U.S. Electricity Deregulation.” Presented at the 28th Annual Eastern Conference of the Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition, Skytop, PA, May 13–15.
5.
DavisL.WolframCatherine (2011). “Divestitures, Consolidation and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power.” Presented at the University of Colorado, April22.
6.
DisneyRichardHaskelJonathanHedenYiva (2003). “Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival in UK Manufacturing.” The Journal of Industrial Economics51(1): 91-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00193.
7.
Energy Information Administration (1999, 2009). http://www.eia.doe.gov/.
8.
FabrizioKira R.RoseNancy R.Catherine WolframD.(2007). “Do Markets Reduce Costs? “Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency” The American Economic Review97(4): 1250-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1250.
9.
GroggerJeffrey (2003). “The Effects of Time Limits, the EITC, and Other Policy Changes on Welfare, Work, and Income among Female-Headed Families.” The Review of Economics and Statistics85(2): 394-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465303765299891.
10.
HallBronwyn H. (1987). “The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing sector.” The Journal of Industrial Economics35(4):583-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2098589.
11.
HiebertDean L. (2002). “The Determinants of the Cost Efficiency of Electric Generating Plants: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.” The Southern Economic Journal68(4): 935-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1061501.
12.
JoskowPaul L.SchmalenseeRichard (1987). “The Performance of Coal-Burning Electric Generating Units in the United States: 1960-1980.” The Journal of Applied Econometrics2(2): 85109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950020203.
13.
JoskowPaul L. (2006). “Markets for Power in the United States: An interim assessment.” The Energy Journal27(1): 1-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No1-2.
14.
KleitAndrew N. and Dek Tecrell (2001). “Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains from Deregulation of Electricity Generation: A Bayesian Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics83(3):523-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00346530152480162.
15.
KnittelChristopher R. “Alternative Regulatory Methods and Firm Efficiency: Stochastic Frontier Evidence from the U.S. Electricity Industry” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3): 530540.
16.
KwokaJ. E. (2008). “Restructuring the U.S. Electric Power Sector: A review of Recent Studies.” Review of Industrial Organization32(3): 165-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9171-2.
17.
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (1995, 2001, 2006, 2009). State Commissions. http://www.naruc.org/commissions.cfm.
18.
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (1995-2006), Membership Directory.
19.
National Energy Affordability and Accessibility Project (2006, 2009). State Restructuring Profile, http://neaap.ncat.org/profiles/index.htm, 2006, 2009.
20.
Olley StevenG.PakesAriel (1996). “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry.” Econometrica64(6): 1263-1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2171831.
21.
SanyalP.GhoshS. (2010). “Product Market Competition and Upstream Innovation: Theory and Evidence from the U.S. Electricity Market Restructuring.” Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
22.
SappingtonDavid E.M.PfeifenbergerJohannes P.HanserPhilipBashedaGregory (2001). “The State of Performance-Based Regulation in the U.S. Electric Utility Industry.” The Electricity Journal14(8): 71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(01)00240-8.
23.
SyversonChad (2004). “Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example.” The Journal of Political Economy112(6): 1181-1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/424743.
24.
TaberJ.ChapmanD.MountT. (2006). “Examining the Effects of Deregulation on Retail Electricity Prices.” Cornell University Working Paper.
25.
United States Census Bureau (2009). http://www.census.gov/.
26.
VeselRichardGregoryJohnFesmireBob (2007). “Drive Technology Enables Combustion Optimization.” Available at: http://www.powergenworldwide.com/index/display/articledisplay/291040/articles/power-engineering/volume-111/issue-4/features/drive-technology-enables-com-bustion-optimization.html.
27.
Ventyx Energy (2007).
28.
ZhangFan (2007). “Does Electricity Restructuring Work? Evidence from the U.S. Nuclear Energy Industry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics55(3): 397-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00317.x.
29.
ZiliakJ.P.FiglioD.N.DavisE.E.ConnollyL.S. (2000). “Accounting for the Decline in AFDC Caseloads: Welfare Reform or Economic Growth?” The Journal of Human Resources35(3): 570586. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146393.
