This paper examines the impacts of the quality of government on international tourism competitiveness. Quality of government is conceptualized in terms of an absence of corruption, a well-established rule of law and bureaucratic efficiency. Based on the cross-country analysis of the Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (World Economic Forum, 2013), the main finding of the study demonstrates that quality of government is positively associated with tourism competitiveness and that this positive effect remains robust across a number of control variables and estimation techniques. The results suggest that public policy for building a successful tourism industry should be nested in the broader project of enhancing the quality of government.
AzzoniC.de MenezesT.A. (2012), ‘Cost competitiveness and international destinations’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 3, pp 714–734.
2.
BordasE. (1994), ‘Competitiveness of tourist destinations in long distance markets’, The Tourist Review, Vol 3, pp 3–9.
3.
CharronN.DahlströmC.LapuenteV. (2012), ‘No law without a state’, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol 40, pp 176–193.
4.
CheibubJ.A.JenniferG.VreelandJ. (2010), ‘Democracy and dictatorship revisited’, Public Choice, Vol 143, pp 67–101.
5.
ChibberV. (2003), Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6.
CrouchG. (2011), ‘Destination competitiveness: An analysis of determinant attributes’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 50, pp 27–45.
7.
DasJ.DirienzoC. (2012), ‘Tourism competitiveness and the role of fractionalization’, International Journal of Tourism Research, Vol 14, pp 285–297.
8.
De SotoH. (2000), The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, Basic Books, New York.
9.
HallerrodB.RothsteinB.DaoudA. (2013), ‘Bad governance and poor children: A comparative analysis of government efficiency and severe child deprivation in 68 low-and middle-income countries’, World Development, Vol 48, pp 19–31.
10.
IvanovS.WebsterC. (2013), ‘Globalization as a driver of destination competitiveness’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 43, pp 624–650.
11.
MazzanecJ.A.RingA. (2011), ‘Tourism destination competitiveness: Second thoughts on the World Economic Forum reports’, Tourism Economics, Vol 17, pp 725–751.
12.
MoP. (2001), ‘Corruption and economic growth’, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol 29, pp 66–79.
13.
NorthD. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York.
14.
NunkooR.RamkisoonH.GursoyD. (2012), ‘Public trust in tourism institutions’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 39, pp 1538–1564.
RitcherL.K. (1992), ‘Political instability and tourism in the third world’, in HarrisonD., ed, Tourism and the Less Developed Countries, Belhaven Press, London, pp 35–46.
17.
RothsteinB. (2011), The Quality of Government, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
18.
RothsteinB.UslanerE. (2005), ‘All for all: Equality, corruption and social trust’, World Politics, Vol 58, pp 41–72.
19.
TsaiH.SongH.WongK. (2009), ‘Tourism and hotel competitiveness research’, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol 26, pp 522–546.
20.
WebsterC.IvanovS.IllumS. (2011), ‘The paradigms of political economy and tourism policy: National tourism organizations and state policy’, in MosedaleJ., ed, Political Economy of Tourism: A Critical Perspective, Routledge, Abingdon, pp 55–73.
