This study assesses the extent to which integrated farming has been adopted in response to support from Royal Development Study Centres (RDSCs) in Thailand. Primary data were collected from 129 sample farmers who lived in the area surrounding two RDSCs and participated in integrated farming programmes. Both RDSCs are located in central Thailand and follow similar modes and processes in promoting integrated farming knowledge and technology extension. Linear regression was used to determine the factors influencing the levels of adoption in the two areas. The findings help to explain variations in the uptake and scale of integrated farming adoption. Policy implications regarding the adoption and promotion of integrated farming are highlighted.
AdesinaA.ChianuJ. (2002), ‘Determinants of farmers' adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria’, Agroforestry Systems, Vol 55, pp 99–112.
2.
CaswellM.ZilbermanD. (1985), ‘The choices of irrigation technologies in California’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 67, pp 224–234.
3.
DaberkowS.G.McBrideW.D. (2004), ‘Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US’, Precision Agriculture, Vol 4, pp 163–177.
4.
DorwardP.ShepherdD.GalpinM. (2007), Participatory Farm Management Methods for Analysis, Decision Making and Communication, FAO, Rome.
5.
D'SouzaG.CyphersD.PhippsT. (1993), ‘Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol 22, pp 159–165.
FederG.SladeR. (1984), Aspects of the Training and Visit System of Agricultural Extension in India: A Comparative Analysis, World Bank, Washington, DC.
8.
JintrawetA. (1995), ‘A decision support system for rapid assessment of lowland rice based cropping alternative in Thailand’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 47, pp 245–258.
9.
JitsanguanT. (2001), Sustainable Agricultural Systems for Small-Scale Farmers in Thailand: Implications for the Environment, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for the Asian and Pacific Region, Taipei.
KalibaA.R.VerkuijlH.MwangiW. (2000), ‘Factors affecting adoption of improved maize seeds and use of inorganic fertilizer for maize production in the intermediate and lowland zones of Tanzania’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol 30, pp 35–47.
12.
KasemS.ThapaG.B. (2011), ‘Crop diversification in Thailand: Status, determinants, and effects on income and use of inputs’, Land Use Policy, Vol 28, pp 618–628.
13.
KhimK. (2001), ‘The effects of small scale aquaculture development practices in the Lower Mekong Delta, Cambodia’, Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
14.
MäderP.FliebachA.DuboisD.GunstL.FriedP.NiggliU. (2002), ‘Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming’, Science, Vol 296, pp 1694–1697.
NgocB. (2005), ‘Promotion of small livestock development of the rural poor in Vietnam: Case study in Dong Kinh Commune, Dung Hung District, Thai Binh Province’, Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
17.
OEPP (2001), Thailand State of Environment Report, Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Science, Bangkok.
18.
OngleyE. (1996), ‘Control of water pollution from agriculture’, Irrigation and Drainage Papers, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
19.
PhongphomA. (2002), ‘Factors influencing farmers in adoption of integrated farming in Sakkonnakhon Land Reform Area in the northeast of Thailand’, Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
20.
PhongphomA. (2009), ‘Farmer's network approach to small farmer development in the northeast of Thailand’, PhD thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
21.
PratumsaA. (2006), ‘Factors influencing the adoption of agricultural innovation by tribal farmers in the north of Thailand’, Master's thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok.
22.
PrettyJ. (2000), Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
23.
RahmM.R.HuffmanW.E. (1984), ‘The adoption of reduced tillage: The role of human capital and other variables’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 66, pp 405–413.
24.
RanaN. (2010), ‘Integrated farming systems: Environmental sustainability in full cycle’, Development Alternatives Newsletter, Vol 20.
25.
RDPB (2001), Twenty Years of Royal Development Projects Board under the Royal Aegis, Aroon Karnpim Press, Bangkok.
26.
RDPB (2008), Three Decades of the Royal Development Study Centers: Happiness and Benefits Conferred to the People, Aroon Karnpim Press, Bangkok.
27.
RogersE.M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
28.
RyanM. (1999), ‘Is an enhanced soil biological community, relative to conventional neighbors, a consistent feature of alternative (organic and biodynamic) agricultural systems?’Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, Vol 17, pp 131–144.
29.
SathirathaiS.PiboolsravutP. (2004), ‘Sufficiency economy and a healthy community’, paper prepared for the Third IUCN World Conservation Congress, 17–25 November, Bangkok.
30.
StockdaleE.V.CooksonW.R. (2003), ‘Sustainable farming systems and their impact on soil biological fertility-some case studies’, in MurphyD.V.AbbotL.K., eds, Soil Biological Fertility: A Key to Sustainability and Use in Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
