Cluster development is prioritized in policy programmes as a means to facilitate regional growth and job creation. Triple Helix actors are often involved in so-called cluster initiatives – intermediary organizations having the objective of the development of a local or regional cluster. This paper maps out the ‘big five’ qualitative success factors in cluster initiative management: the idea; driving forces and commitment; activities; critical mass; and organization. The proposed framework enables the assessment of performance and sustainability over time, useful for both everyday management operations and policy programmes designed to support cluster initiatives.
AthiyamanA.ParkanC. (2008), ‘A functionalist framework for identifying business clusters: Applications in far North Queensland’, Australian Journal of Management, Vol 33, No 1, pp 201–230.
2.
AutioE.KlofstenM. (1998), ‘A comparative study of two European business incubators’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 36, No 1, pp 30–43.
3.
BreschiS.LissoniF. (2003), Mobility and Social Networks: Localised Knowledge Network Spillovers Revisited, CESPRI (Centro di Ricerca sui Processi di Innovazione e Internazionalizzazione), Milan.
4.
BrulinG.SjöbergK.SvenssonL. (2009), ‘Gemensam kunskapsbildning för regional tillväxt’, Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv, Vol 15, No 1, pp 61–74.
5.
CastellsM. (1989), The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
6.
DTI (2004), Practical Guide to Cluster Development, Report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the English RDAs by Ecotec Research & Consulting, DTI, London.
7.
DavidssonP.KlofstenM. (2003), ‘The business platform: Developing an instrument to gauge and assist the development of young firms’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 41, No 1, pp 1–26.
8.
DavidssonP.HunterE.KlofstenM. (2006), ‘Institutional forces: The invisible hand that shapes venture ideas’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 24, No 2, pp 115–129.
9.
Ecotec (2001), A Practical Guide to Cluster Development, Ecotec Research & Consulting, London.
10.
EtzkowitzH. (2002), MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science, Routledge, London.
11.
EtzkowitzH. (2010), The Triple Helix: University–Industry– Government Innovation in Action, Routledge, London.
12.
EtzkowitzH.KlofstenM. (2005), ‘The innovative region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development’, R&D Management, Vol 35, No 3, pp 243–255.
13.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (2000), ‘The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Research Policy, Vol 29, No 2, pp 109–123.
14.
GibbA.A. (1990), ‘Design effective programmes for encouraging the small business start-up process’, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol 14, No 1, pp 17–25.
15.
GiulianiE.BellM. (2005), ‘The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster’, Research Policy, Vol. 34, No 1, pp 47–68.
16.
HassinkR. (2005), ‘How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster’, European Planning Studies, Vol 13, No 4, pp 521–535.
17.
IammarinoS.McCanneP. (2006), ‘The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers’, Research Policy, Vol 35, No 7, pp 1018–1036.
18.
JensenC.TrägårdhB. (2004), ‘Narrating the Triple Helix concept in “weak” regions: Lessons from Sweden’, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol 27, No 5, pp 513–530.
19.
JohannissonB.DahlstrandLindholm Å. (2009), ‘Bridging the functional and territorial rationales: Proposing an integrating framework for regional dynamics’, European Planning Studies, Vol 17, No 8, pp 1117–1133.
20.
Jones-EvansD.KlofstenM. (1997), ‘Universities and local economic development’, European Planning Studies, Vol 5, No 1, pp 77–93.
21.
Jones-EvansD.KlofstenM.AnderssonE.PandyaD. (1999), ‘Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: The role of the industrial liaison office’, R&D Management, Vol 29, No 1, pp 47–56.
22.
KeebleD.NachumL. (2002), ‘Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and Southern England’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol 27, No 1, pp 67–90.
23.
KempinskyP. (2004), ‘Indikatorer för ledning och lärande kring regionala utvecklingsprocesser’, in ChristensenL.KempinskyP., eds, Att mobilisera för regional tillväxt; Regionala utvecklingsprocesser, kluster och innovationssystem, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
24.
KenneyM. (2000), ‘Introduction’, in KenneyM., ed, Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 1–14.
25.
KetelsC.MemedovicO. (2008), ‘From clusters to cluster-based economic development’, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Vol 1, No 3, pp 375–392.
26.
KirwanP.M.van der SijdeP.KlofstenM. (2008), ‘Supporting high-tech companies: Using the business platform as a practical Instrument’, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Vol 1, No 1, pp 48–65.
KlofstenM. (2005), ‘New venture ideas: An analysis of their origin and early development’, Journal of Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol 17, No 1, pp 105–119.
29.
KlofstenM.Jones-EvansD. (1996), ‘Stimulation of technology-based small firms: A case study of university–industry cooperation’, Technovation, Vol 16No 4, pp 187–193.
30.
KlofstenM.MikaelssonA-S. (1996), ‘Support of small business firms: Entrepreneurs – views of the demand and supply side’, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol 4, No 4, pp 417–432.
31.
LaurI.KlofstenM.BienkowskaD. (2012), ‘Catching regional development dreams: A study of cluster initiatives as intermediaries’, European Planning Studies, Vol 20, No 11, pp 1909–1921.
32.
Ledningskonsulterna (2008), Kluster och klusterteknik som instrument i det regionala tillväxtarbetet – mittutvärdering av Nuteks regionala klusterprogram, Info 0080, Tillväxtverket.
33.
LundequistP.PowerD. (2002), ‘Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden’, European Planning Studies, Vol 10, No 6, pp 685–704.
34.
MarshallA. (1920 [1890]), Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.
35.
MoodyssonJ.CoenenL.AsheimB. (2008), ‘Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster’, Environment and Planning: A, Vol 40, No 5, p 1040.
36.
MorosiniP. (2004), ‘Industrial clusters, knowledge integration and performance’, World Development, Vol 32, No 2, pp 305–326.
37.
MossT. (2009), ‘Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition’, Environment and Planning: A, Vol 41, No 6, pp 1480–1495.
38.
MotoyamaY. (2008), ‘What was new about the cluster theory? What could it answer and what could it not answer?’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 22, No 4, pp 353–363.
39.
NordenskyJ. (2009), Kartlä ggning av svenska klusterinitiativ, Vinnova Report VR 2009:31, Vinnova, Stockholm.
40.
NormannR. (1975), Skapande företagsledning, Bonniers, Stockholm.
41.
NorrmanC. (2008), Entrepreneurship policy: Public support for technology-based ventures, Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertations, No 1175, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, p 112.
42.
OakeyR. (2007), ‘Clustering and the R&D management of high-technology small firms: In theory and practice’, R&D Management, Vol 37, No 3, pp 237–248.
43.
OlofssonC. (1979), Företagets exploatering av sina marknadsrelationer: En studie av produktutveckling, Forskningsrapport, No 91, Universitetet i Linköping, Ekonomiska Institutionen, Linköping.
44.
PorterM. (1998), ‘Clusters and the new economics competition’, Harvard Business Review, November–December, pp 77–90.
45.
PorterM.E. (2000), ‘Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 14, No 1, pp 15–34.
46.
RainesP. (2000), Developing Cluster Policies in Seven European Regions, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
47.
RangaM.EtzkowitzH. (2013), ‘Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 27, No 4, pp 237–262.
48.
ReidN.CarrollM.C.SmithB.W. (2007), ‘Critical steps in the cluster building process’, Economic Development Journal, Vol 6, No 4, pp 44–52.
49.
SaarenketoS.PuumalainenK.KuivalainenO.KyläheikoK. (2009), ‘A knowledge-based view of growth in new ventures’, European Business Review, Vol 21, No 6, 531–546.
50.
SmithH.L.GlassonJ.RomeoS.WatersR.ChadwickA. (2013), ‘Entrepreneurial regions: Evidence from Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire’, Social Science Information, Vol 52, No 4, pp 653–673.
51.
SölvellÖ.LindqvistG.KetelsC. (2003), The Cluster Initiative Greenbook, Ivory Tower AB, Stockholm.
52.
SölvellÖ, (2009), Clusters: Balancing Evolutionary and Constructive Forces, Ivory Tower AB, Stockholm.
53.
SvenssonP.KlofstenM.EtzkowitzH. (2012), ‘An entrepreneurial university strategy for renewing a declining industrial city: The Norrköping way’, European Planning Studies, Vol 20, No 4, pp 505–525.
54.
TödtlingF.SkokanK.HöglingerC.RumpelP.GrillitschM. (2013), ‘Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: Comparing software firms in Moravia–Silesia and Upper Austria’, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 20, No 2, pp 188–205.
55.
WiddingL.Ø. (2005), ‘Building entrepreneurial knowledge reservoirs’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol 12, No 4, pp 595–612.
56.
YlinenpääH. (2009), ‘Entrepreneurship and innovation systems: Towards a development of the ERIS/IRIS concept’, European Planning Studies, Vol 17, No 8, pp 1153–1170.
57.
YlinenpääH.QuistE.RöringO. (2003), Kluster.nb.se: Om kluster som klister och hävstång för en dynamisk utveckling i Norrbotten, Arbetsrapporter, AR 2003:54, Luleå Tekniska Universitet, Skellefteå.
