Considerable emphasis has been placed on developing technologies for agricultural sustainability. Many bilateral projects are working to achieve this outcome. A desk review was conducted to study the importance of project duration for the effectiveness of sustainable agricultural projects. Longer-duration projects were successful in addressing more holistic issues than short projects. However, funding agencies tend to fund shorter-duration projects, so projects become progressively shorter. At the same time, the number of projects implemented each year is increasing. Despite the decrease in total development assistance, increases in project numbers, particularly since 1986, appear to be at the cost of project duration. Short project duration was one of the most cited reasons for not completing essential dissemination activities for wider adoption, whereas longer-duration projects were usually considered more successful in addressing more holistic issues. It is difficult to produce tangible outputs from agricultural and soil conservation projects within five years. Considering the slow changes in the system and in agricultural and environmental sustainability, the authors suggest that project developers should be advised to plan for a minimum of 5–10 years, depending on the nature of activities. It is time for funding agencies to reconsider their tendency to fund shorter-duration projects.
BieS. W.BaldasciniA.TschirleyJ. (1997), ‘The context of indicators in FAO’, in Land Quality Indicators and their Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, FAO, Rome.
5.
BridgesE. M.OldemanL. R. (2001), ‘Food production and environmental degradation’, in BridgesE. M., eds, Responses to Land Degradation, Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, NH.
Development Gateway (2003), ‘AiDA – Accessible Information on Development Activities’, Development Gateway Foundations, Washington, DC, Website: http://aida.developmentgateway.org/AidaHome.do.
8.
DirksenH. (2001), Considerations and Lessons from Implementing the Thai–German Highland Development Program (TG-HDP) in Northern Thailand, Thai–German Highland Development Program (TG-HDP), Website: http://www.gtz-asia-online.org/hdp/frame.htm?lib.nsf?OpenDatabase.
DumanskiJ., eds (1991), ‘Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. Volume 2: Technical Papers’IBSRAM Proceedings, Vol 12, No 2.
12.
EvansL. T. (1998), Feeding Ten Billion: Plants and Population Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13.
EvansP. T.SophanaV. (2004), ‘Lessons from the “Participatory Natural Resource Management in the Tonle Sap Region” project’, in TorellM.SalamancaA. M.RatnerB. D., eds, Wetlands Management in Cambodia: Socio-economic, Ecological, and Policy Perspectives, Technical Report 64, WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia.
14.
GerpacioR. V., ed (2001), Impact of Public- and Private-Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.
15.
GowdaC. L. L., eds (1996), Approaches to On-Farm Research in Asia: Summary Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on On-Farm Adaptive Research, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
16.
HowelerR. H. (1996), ‘The use of farmer-participatory research methodologies to enhance the adoption of soil conservation practices in cassava-based cropping systems in Asia’, in SombatpanitS., eds, Soil Conservation Extension: From Concepts to Adoption, Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, NH.
17.
HudsonN. W. (1991), ‘A study of the reasons for success or failure of soil conservation projects’FAO Soils Bulletin, Vol 64.
18.
HurniH. (2000), ‘Soil conservation policies and sustainable land management: A global overview’, in NapierT. L.NapierS. M.TvrdonJ., eds, Soil and Water Conservation Policies and Programs: Successes and Failures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
19.
ICIMOD (1999), Manual on Contour Hedgerow Inter-cropping Technology, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.
KokubunM. (1998), ‘JIRCAS projects for the development of technologies for sustainable agriculture in Asia’, in HoriuchiH.TsubotaK., eds, The 4th JIRCAS International Symposium: Sustainable Agricultural Development Compatible with Environmental Conservation in Asia, JIRCAS International Symposium Series, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Research, Tsukuba, Japan.
23.
LalR.MillerF. P.LoganT. J. (1988), ‘Are intensive agricultural practices environmentally and ethically sound?’Journal of Agricultural Ethics, Vol 1, pp 193–210.
24.
GuobinLiu (1999), ‘Soil conservation and sustainable agriculture on the Loess Plateau: Challenges and prospects’Ambio, Vol 28, No 8 pp 663–668.
25.
MaglinaoA., eds (1995), ‘International workshop on conservation farming for sloping uplands in Southeast Asia: Challenges, opportunities, and prospects’, IBSRAM Proceedings, No 14, The International Board for Soil Research and Management (IBSRAM), Bangkok.
26.
McKemeyK., (2003), Farmers' Attitudes Towards Land Management Strategies: A Theory of Reasoned Action Analysis, Working Paper 5, DfID NRSP project R7958, ‘Developing supportive policy environments for improved land management strategies – Nepal’, University of Reading, Reading.
27.
MonscheinY. (1999), ‘Poverty reduction and food security in China: The Sino–German food security program Shandong’Agriculture and Rural Development, Vol 2, pp 61–63.
28.
MunasingheM.ShearerW., eds (1995), Defining and Measuring Sustainability: the Biophysical Foundation, World Bank, Washington, DC.
29.
NesbittH. J., ed (1997), Rice Production in Cambodia, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, The Philippines.
30.
NeupaneH.OjhaH.GarforthC. (2002), Scaling Up of Sustainable Soil Management Practices: Case Studies of Panchkhal and Sanga Villages in Kavre District, Nepal, ForestAction, Kathmandu, and the University of Reading, Reading.
31.
NutalayaP. (1991), ‘Pollution and other off-site effects on sustainable land development’, in DumanskiJ., eds, Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World: Technical Papers, IBSRAM Proceedings, Vol 12, No 2.
32.
Pinstrup-AndersonP.Pandya-LorchR. (1998), ‘Food security and sustainable use of natural resources: A 2020 vision’Ecological Economics, Vol 26, pp 1–10.
33.
PratapT.WatsonH. R. (1994), Sloping Agricultural Land Technology (SALT): A Regenerative Option for Sustainable Mountain Farming, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu.
34.
RigbyD. (2001), ‘Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice’Ecological Economics, Vol 39, pp 463–478.
35.
RölingN. (2005), ‘Gateway to the global garden: Beta/gamma science for dealing with ecological rationality’, in PrettyJ., ed, The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Agriculture, Earthscan, London.
36.
RuaysoongnernS. (1999), ‘Adoption of sloping land conservation practices by farmers in the northeast of Thailand’, in McDonaldM.BrownK., eds, Issues and Options in the Design of Soil and Water Conservation Projects, School of Agriculture and Forest Sciences Publication Number 17, University of Wales, Bangor.
37.
SajjapongseA., ed (1992), Technical Report on the Management of Sloping Lands for Sustainable Agriculture in Asia, Phase 1, 1988–1991 (IBSRAM/ASIALAND), Network Document No 2, International Board for Soil Research and Management (IBSRAM), Bangkok.
38.
SajjapongseA.ElliottC. R., eds (1995), ASIALAND: The Management of Sloping Lands for Sustainable Agriculture in Asia (Phase 2, 1992–1994), Network Document No 12, IBSRAM, Bangkok.
39.
SajjapongseA.LesleiR. N., eds (1998), ASIALAND: The Management of Sloping Lands for Sustainable Agriculture in Asia (Phase 3, 1995–1997), IBSRAM Proceedings No 23, IBSRAM, Bangkok.
40.
SombatpanitS. (2001), ‘Thailand's response to land degradation: The need to control soil erosion’, in BridgesE. M., eds, Responses to Land Degradation, Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, NH.
41.
SUAS (1990), Evaluation of the Chinese–Swedish Soil Conservation Co-operation Project, Working Paper No 147, International Rural Development Department, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SUAS), Uppsala.
42.
SUAS (1991), Chinese–Swedish Soil Conservation Project 1987–1990: Final Report, International Rural Development Department, SUAS, Uppsala.
43.
YaTang (1999), ‘Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of soil conservation programs in Hindu Kush Himalayan region’, in McDonaldM.BrownK., eds, Issues and Options in the Design of Soil and Water Conservation Projects, School of Agriculture and Forest Sciences Publication Number 17, University of Wales, Bangor.
TrotterB.GordonA. (2000), ‘Charting change in official assistance to agriculture’Food Policy, Vol 25, pp 115–124.
46.
van KeerK., eds (1998), Options for Soil and Farmer Friendly Agriculture in the Highlands of Northern Thailand, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn.
47.
WalmsleyJ. J. (2002), ‘Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems’Environmental Management, Vol 29, No 2 pp 195–206.
48.
WillsJ. B., eds (1987), Coordination of Grain Legumes Research in Asia: Summary Proceedings of the Review and Planning Meeting for Asian Regional Research on Grain Legumes (Groundnut, Chickpea, and Pigeonpea), 16–18 Dec 1985, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
