In spite of the importance often attached to the role played by leadership in university-based cooperative research centres, we know very little about what ‘leadership’ means in this specific context. The research reported here used a qualitative approach to identify fifteen dimensions of leadership performance for directors of university-based cooperative research centres, which might serve as the basis of a future quantitative leadership performance measure. Nineteen university faculty members working in research centres were interviewed, and their responses were content-analysed to identify both facilitators and inhibitors of centre directors' performance. Facilitative performance dimensions included: technical expertise, ambition/work ethic, broad thinking, embracing ambiguity, balancing competing stakeholders, leveraging social capital, obtaining resources, navigating bureaucracy, granting autonomy, interpersonal skill, team building and task adaptability. Inhibiting performance dimensions included: abrasiveness, disorganization and conflict avoidance. The results are discussed in terms of the commonalities and particularities they reveal about cooperative centre leadership relative to leadership performance in other settings.
AdamsJ.D.ChiangE.P.StarkeyK. (2001), ‘Industry–university cooperative research centers’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, pp 73–86.
2.
AmabileT.M.SchatzelE.A.MonetaG.B.KramerS.J. (2004), ‘Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support’, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol 15, pp 5–32.
3.
AndrewsF.M.FarrisG.F. (1967), ‘Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams’, Personnel Psychology, Vol 20, pp 497–515.
4.
BasadurM.RuncoM.A.VegaL.A. (2000), ‘Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: A causal process model’, Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol 34, pp 77–100.
5.
BassB. M. (1985), Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, The Free Press, New York.
6.
BlumenthalD.GluckM.LouisK.S.WiseD. (1986), ‘Industrial support of university research in biotechnology’, Science, Vol 231, pp 242–246.
7.
BurnsJ.M. (1978), Leadership, Harper and Row, New York.
8.
CardinalL.B. (2001), ‘Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development’, Organization Science, Vol 12, pp 19–36.
9.
CharanR.DrotterS.NoelJ. (2000), The Leadership Pipeline: How to Build the Leadership Powered Company, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
10.
CohenW.LevinthalD. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, pp 128–152.
11.
CohenW.FloridaR.GoeW.R. (1994), University-Industry Research Centers in the United States, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
12.
CorderoR.FarrisG. (2004), ‘Supervisors in R&D laboratories: Using technical people, and administrative skills effectively’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering management, Vol 51, pp 19–30.
13.
CummingsJ.N.KieslerS. (2007), ‘Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations’, Research Policy, Vol 36, pp 1620–1634.
DaftR. L. (1978), ‘A dual-core model of organizational innovation’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 21, pp 193–210.
16.
DansereauF.GraenG.B.HagaW.J. (1975), ‘A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol 13, pp 46–78.
17.
DudeckS.Z.HallW.B. (1991), ‘Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later’, Creativity Research Journal, Vol 4, pp 213–232.
18.
ElkinsT.KellerR.T. (2003), ‘Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework’, Leadership Quarterly, Vol 14, pp 587–606.
19.
FarrisG.F. (1988), ‘Technical leadership: Much discussed but little understood’, Research Technology Management, Vol 31, pp 12–16.
20.
FellerI. (1997), ‘Technology transfer from universities’, in SmartJ.C. ed, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol XII, Agathon Press, Edison, NJ.
21.
FleishmanE.A.MumfordM.D.ZaccaroS.J.LevinK.Y.KorotkinA.L.HeinM.B. (1989), ‘Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation’, Leadership Quarterly, Vol 2, pp 245–287.
22.
GeislerE.RubensteinA. (1989), ‘University–industry relations: A review of major issues’, in LinkA.TasseyE., eds, Cooperative Research: New Strategies for Competitiveness, St Martin's Press, New York, pp 43–62.
23.
GillespieN.A.MannL. (2004), ‘Transformational leadership and shared values: The building block of trust’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol 19, pp 588–607.
24.
GlaserB.G.StraussA.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldene de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY.
25.
GraenG.B.Uhl-BienM. (1995), ‘Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years’, Leadership Quarterly, Vol 6, pp 219–247.
26.
GrayD.O. (1998), ‘Creating win–win partnerships’, in GrayD.O.WaltersS.G., eds, Managing the Industry/University Cooperative Research Center: A Guide for Directors and Other Stakeholders, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
27.
HirstG.MannL.BainP.Pirola-MerloA.RichverA. (2004), ‘Learning to lead: The development and testing of a model of leadership learning’, Leadership Quarterly, Vol 15, pp 311–327.
28.
HmieleskiK.M.EnsleyM.D. (2007), ‘A contextual examination of new venture performance: Entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 28, pp 865–889.
29.
HoganR.HoganJ. (2001), ‘Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol 9, No 1/2, pp 40–51.
30.
HouseR.J. (1971), ‘A path–goal theory of leader effectiveness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 16, pp 321–339.
JankowskiJ.E. (2002), ‘Measurement and growth of R&D within the service economy’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, pp 323–336.
33.
JudgeW.Q.GryxellG.E.DooleyR.S. (1997), ‘The new task of R&D management: Creating goal-directed communities for innovation’, California Management Review, Vol 39, pp 72–85.
34.
KellerR. T. (2006), ‘Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 91, pp 202–210.
35.
KellerR.T. (1992), ‘Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups’, Journal of Management, Vol 18, pp 489–501.
36.
MintzbergH. (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations, The Free Press, New York.
37.
MorganR.B. (1989), ‘Reliability and validity of a factor analytically derived measure of leadership behavior and characteristics’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol 49, pp 911–919.
NarayananV.K. (2001), ‘Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage’, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
40.
National Science Board (2002), Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
41.
NSF (2006a), Science and Engineering Indicators 2006, NSB 06–01, Division of Science Resources Statistics, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
42.
NSF (2006b), Where Has the Money Gone? Declining Industrial Support of Academic R&D NSF 06–328, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
43.
NSF (2007), US R&D Increased 6.0% in 2006 According to NSF Projections, NSF 07–317, Division of Science Resources Statistics, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
44.
NystromH. (1990), ‘Organizational innovation’, in WestM.S.FarrJ.L., eds, Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, Wiley, New York, pp 143–162.
45.
QSR International (2006), NVivo 7, QSR International, Melbourne.
46.
Research Centers and Services Directory (2006), 35th edition, Thomson Gale, Farmington Hills, MI.
47.
SchonD.A. (1963), ‘Champions for radical new inventions’, Harvard Business Review, Vol 41, pp 77–86.
48.
ScottS.G.BruceR.A. (1998), ‘Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader–member relations on innovative behavior’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 45, pp 3–10.
49.
ShimD.LeeM. (2001), ‘Upward influence styles of R&D project leaders’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 48, pp 394–413.
50.
SimontonD.K. (1984), ‘Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries’, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
51.
TornatzkyL.LovelaceK.GrayD.O.WaltersS.G.GeislerE. (1998), ‘Center leadership: Putting it all together’ in GrayD.O.WaltersS.G., eds, Managing the ndustry/University Cooperative Research Center: A Guide for Directors and Other Stakeholders, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
52.
TornowW.W.PintoP.R. (1976), ‘The development of a managerial job taxonomy: A system for describing, classifying, and evaluating executive positions’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 61, pp 410–418.
