Many theorists of democratization transition have, either explicitly or implicitly, a teleological concept of political progress, liberalization and reform. For such theorists, countries such as Malaysia are therefore in transition towards substantive ‘full’ liberal democracy. Taken in this light, the significant advances by opposition political parties in the 2008 federal and state elections in Malaysia represent a major advance towards this end goal. While many have highlighted that Malaysia may in fact be an exception to this rule, this paper contends instead that the Malaysian case study challenges the central tenets of democratic transition more profoundly. Indeed, since independence the Malaysian regime has proved remarkably resilient and resistant to pressures for political liberalization.
AbbottJ. P. (2001), ‘Vanquishing Banquo's ghost: The Anwar Ibrahim affair and its impact on Malaysian politics’, Asian Studies Review, Vol 25, No 3, September, pp 285–309.
2.
AbbottJ.GregoriosS. (2009), ‘Islamization in Malaysia: Dakwah, design and dynamics’, unpublished paper.
3.
AbbottJ. P.FranksO. (2007), ‘Malaysia at fifty: Conflicting definitions of citizenship’, Asian Affairs, Vol XXXVIII, No III, November, pp 337–356.
4.
AlmondG. (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5.
AlmondG. A.ColemanJ. S. (1960), The Politics of the Developing Areas, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6.
AlmondG.PowellG. B. (1966), Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach, Little, Brown and Co, Boston, MA.
7.
BarracloughS. (1985), ‘The dynamics of coercion in the Malaysian political process’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol 19, No 4, pp 797–822.
8.
BellD. A.BrownD.JayasuriyaK. (1995), Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, Macmillan, London.
9.
BrownG. (2008), ‘Federal and state elections in Malaysia, March 2008’, Electoral Studies, Vol 27, No 4, December, pp 740–744.
10.
BryantC. G. A. (1993), ‘Civic nation, civil society, civil religion’, in HallJ., ed, Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11.
CarothersT. (2002), ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 13, No 1, January, pp 5–21.
12.
CaseW. (1993), ‘Semi-democracy in Malaysia: Withstanding the pressures for regime change,’Pacific Affairs, Vol 66, No 2, pp 183–206.
13.
CaseW. (1996), ‘UMNO paramountcy: A report on single-party dominance in Malaysia’, Party Politics, Vol 2, No 1, pp 115–127.
14.
CaseW. (1997a), ‘1996 UMNO party election: Two for the show’, Pacific Affairs, Vol 7, No 3, pp 393–411.
15.
CaseW. (1997b), ‘Malaysia: Still the semi-democratic paradigm’, Asian Studies Review, Vol 21, No 2–3, pp 79–90.
16.
CaseW. (2002), Politics in Southeast Asia, Curzon, Richmond.
17.
CaseW. (2006), ‘Manipulative skills: How do rulers control the electoral arena?’ in SchedlerA., ed, Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
18.
ChinJ. (1997), ‘Malaysia in 1996: Mahathir–Anwar bouts, UMNO election, and Sarawak surprise’, Asian Survey, Vol 37, No 2, pp 181–187.
19.
ChristieK.RoyD. (2001), Politics of Human Rights in East Asia, Pluto Press, London.
20.
CollierD.LevitskyS. (1997), ‘Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research’, World Politics, Vol 49, No 3, pp 430–451.
21.
CrouchH. (1993), ‘Malaysia: Neither authoritarian nor democratic’, in HewisonK.RobisonR.RodanG., eds, Southeast Asia in the 1990s, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
22.
DahlR. A. (1998), On Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
23.
DiamondL. (1996), ‘Is the Third Wave over?’Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, April, p 3.
24.
DoganM.HigleyJ. (1998), Elites, Crises and the Origins of Regimes, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
25.
DonnellG.SchmitterP.WhiteheadL., eds (1986), Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy, Part 4, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
26.
DoorenspleetR. (2005), Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
27.
EmbongA. R. (2001), Southeast Asian Middle Classes: Prospects for Social Change and Democratisation, UKM Publishing, Kuala Lumpur.
28.
GillG. (2000), The Dynamics of Democratization: Elites, Civil Society and the Transition Process, St Martin's Press, London.
29.
GuehennoJ. M. (1995), The End of the Nation State (trans ElliottVictoria), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
30.
GuntherR.DiamandourosP. N.PuhleH. J., eds (1995), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
31.
HaggardS.KaufmanR. (1995), The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
32.
HilleyJ. (2001), Malaysia: Mahathirism, Hegemony, and the New Opposition, Zed Books, London.
33.
HuntingtonS. P. (1993), The Third Wave: Democratisation in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
34.
HuntingtonS. (1996), ‘Democracy for the long haul’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, April, p 5.
35.
JesudasonJ. (1995), ‘Statist democracy and the limits to civil society in Malaysia’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, Vol 33, No 3, pp 335–356.
36.
JesudasonJ. (1996), ‘The syncretic state and the structuring of oppositional politics in Malaysia’, in RodanG., ed, Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia, Routledge, London.
37.
JonesD. M.BrownD. (1994), ‘Singapore and the myth of the liberalizing middle class’, Pacific Review, Vol 7, No 1, pp 79–87.
38.
KahnJ. S.LohF., eds (1992), Fragmented Vision: Culture and Politics in Contemporary Malaysia, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
39.
KooB. T. (1995), Paradoxes of Mahathirism: An Intellectual Biography of Mahathir Mohamad, Oxford University Press, Singapore.
40.
LeftwichA., ed (1996), Democracy and Development: Theory and Practice, Polity Press, Cambridge.
41.
LinzJ.StepanA. (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
42.
LipsetS. (1959), ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, No 53.
43.
LipsetS. (1960), Political Man, Anchor Books, Garden City, NY.
44.
WahF. Loh Kok (2002), ‘Developmentalism and the limits of democratic discourse’, in WahF. Loh KokTiekKhoo Boo, eds, Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, Curzon, Richmond.
45.
WahF. Loh KokTiekKhoo Boo, eds (2002), Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, Curzon, Richmond.
46.
LopezL. (1999), ‘Cleaning up the mess’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 15 January.
47.
LuckhamR.WhiteG., eds (1996), Democratisation in the South: The Jagged Wave, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
48.
MeansG. (1996), ‘Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, No 4, pp 103–117.
49.
NeherC. D.MarlayR. (1995), Values, Culture, Development and Democracy in Southeast Asia: The Winds of Change, Westview, Boulder, CO.
50.
O'DonnellG.SchmitterP.WhiteheadL., eds (1986), Transitions From Authoritarian Rule. Vol. 4: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
51.
OttawayM. (2003), Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.
52.
PalanR.AbbottJ. (2000), State Strategies in the Global Political Economy, Cassell, London.
53.
PastorR. A., ed (1989), Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, Holmes and Meier, New York.
54.
Pew Global Attitudes Project (2009), The Global Middle Class: Views on Democracy, Religion, Values, and Life Satisfaction in Emerging Nations, Pew Research, Washington, DC, Website: http://pewglobal.org/commentary/pdf/1051.pdf.
55.
PyeL. (1985), Asian Power and Politics, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
56.
PuttnamR. (1995), ‘Bowling alone: America's declining social capital’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 6, No 1, pp 65–78.
57.
PuttnamR. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
58.
RobisonR.GoodmanD., eds (1996), The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonalds and Middle-Class Revolutions, Routledge, London.
59.
RostowW. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
60.
RueschemeyerD.StephensJ. (1992), Capitalist Development and Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
61.
SaravanamuttuJ. (2006), ‘Democracy and modernity – when the twain shall meet? Reflections on the Asian conundrum’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol 7, No 1, pp 41–58.
62.
SchedlerA. (2002a), ‘Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 13, No 2, pp 36–50.
63.
SchedlerA. (2002b), ‘The nested game of democratization by elections’, International Political Science Review, Vol 23, No 1, pp 103–122.
64.
SchedlerA., ed (2006), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
65.
StepanA. (1988), Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
66.
TanS. (1990), ‘The rise of state authoritarianism in Malaysia’, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol 22, No 3, pp 32–42.
67.
WeissM. (2006), Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
68.
WelshB. (1996), ‘Attitudes towards democracy in Malaysia’, Asian Survey, Vol 36, No 9, pp 882–903.
69.
WorthO. (2002), ‘The Janus-like character of counter-hegemony: Progressive and nationalist responses to globalisation’, Global Society, Vol 16, No 3, pp 297–315.
