Universities are increasingly encouraged to take a leading role in economic development, particularly through innovation. Simultaneously, economic development policy itself is increasingly focused on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), creating overlapping interactions in the roles of government policy, universities and SMEs and the processes of innovation creation and dissemination. This paper examines issues arising from these developments and relating to the key stakeholders (industry, government and universities in particular), the enabling mechanisms (network governance, relevant education, training and learning, and suitable structures), and local and cross-local links. The authors then use quantitative analysis of 450 SMEs in the UK to begin to evaluate the roles of universities and highlight areas for further theoretical development.
AcsZ.J.AudretschD.B.BraunerhjelmP.CarlssonB. (2004), ‘The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth’, Discussion Paper No 4783, December, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
2.
AllenD.N.LevineV. (1986), Nurturing Advanced Technology Enterprises, Praeger, New York.
3.
AsheimB.GertlerM. (2005), ‘The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems’, in FagerbergJ.MoweryD.C.NelsonR.R., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–317.
4.
AsheimB.T.CoenenT. (2006), ‘Contextualizing regional innovation systems in a globalizing learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 31, pp 163–173.
5.
AsheimB.T.IsaksenA. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 27, pp 77–86.
6.
AudretschD. (2004), ‘Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship’, Industry and Innovation, Vol 11, No 3, pp 167–191.
7.
AudretschD.LehmannE. (2005), ‘Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?’, Research Policy, Vol 34, pp 1191–1202.
8.
BardachJ.L.EcclesR.G. (1991), ‘Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms’, in ThompsonG.FrancesJ.LevacicR.MitchellJ., eds, Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, Sage, London, pp 277–292.
9.
BehrensT.R.GrayD.O. (2001), ‘Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome’, Research Policy, Vol 30, pp 179–199.
BirdB.J.HaywardD.J.AllenD.N. (1993), ‘Conflicts in the commercialization of knowledge: Perspectives from science and entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol 17, No 4, pp 57–76.
12.
BirleyS. (2002), ‘Universities, academics, and spinout companies: Lessons from Imperial’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol 1, No 1, pp 1–21.
13.
BokD. (2003), Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
14.
BoschmaR.A. (2005), ‘Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment’, Regional Studies, Vol 39, No 1, pp 61–74.
15.
BoucherG.ConwayC.Van Der MeerE. (2003), ‘Tiers of engagement by universities in their region's development’, Regional Studies, Vol 37, No 9, pp 887–897.
16.
BraczykH.-J.CookeP.HeidenreichM., eds (1998), Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalised World, UCL, London and Pennsylvania.
17.
BrooksbankD.MorseL.ThomasB.CliftonN. (2001), ‘An assessment of the management and practice of training for businesses in South East Wales’, International Journal of Applied Management, Vol 2, pp 79–106.
18.
CarlssonB.MudambiR. (2003), ‘Globalization, entrepreneurship, and public policy: A systems view’, Industry and Innovation, Vol 10, No 1, pp 103–116.
CookeP. (1997), ‘Regions in a global market: The experiences of Wales and Baden Württemberg’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol 4, No 2, pp 349–381.
21.
CookeP. (1998), ‘Introduction: Origins of the concept’, in BraczykH.J.CookeP.HeidenreichM., eds, Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalised World, UCL, London and Pennsylvania.
22.
CookeP.BoekholtP.TodtlingF. (2000), The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness, Pinter, London.
23.
CookeP.CliftonN.OleagaM. (2005), ‘Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development’, Regional Studies, Vol 39, No 8, pp 1065–1077.
24.
DelmarF.DavidssonP. (1998), ‘A taxonomy of high-growth firms’, paper presented at the Babson College–Kaufmann Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Ghent, 21–23 May.
25.
EtzkowitzH. (2003), ‘Research groups as quasi-firms: The invention of the entrepreneurial university’, Research Policy, Vol 32, pp 109–121.
26.
EtzkowtizH.LeydesdorffL. (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University– Industry–Government Relations, Pinter, London.
27.
FrenzM.MichieJ.OughtonC. (2005), ‘Innovation and cooperation: The role of absorptive capacity’, Birkbeck Working Paper Series, Birkbeck University of London.
28.
FrenzM.OughtonC. (2006), Innovation in the UK Regions and Devolved Administrations: A Review of the Literature, Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, DTI, London.
29.
GalambosL.SewellJ.E. (1996), Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp and Dohme, and Mulford, 1895–1995, Cambridge University Press, New York.
30.
GranovetterM. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol 91, pp 481–510.
31.
GunasekaraC. (2006), ‘Leading the horses to water: The dilemmas of academics and university managers in regional engagement’, Journal of Sociology, Vol 42, No 2, pp 145–163.
32.
HarmanG. (2006), ‘Research and Scholarship’, in ForestJ.J.AltbachP.G., International Handbook of Higher Education, Part One: Global Themes and Contemporary Challenges, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 309–328.
33.
KeastR.BrownK. (2002), ‘The government service delivery network: A case study of the push and pull of central government coordination’, Public Management Review, Vol 4, No 4, pp 439–459.
34.
KeastR.MandellM.P.BrownK. (2005), ‘Governance arrangements and network management: The impact on hybrid networks’, paper presented to the Ninth International Research Symposium on Public Management, Milan, 6–8 April.
35.
KennyM. (1987), ‘The ethical dilemmas of university–industry collaborations’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 6, pp 127–135.
36.
KitagawaF. (2004), ‘Universities and regional advantage: Higher education and innovation policies in English regions’, European Planning Studies, Vol 12, No 6, pp 835–852.
37.
LambertR. (2003), Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration: Final Report, HM Treasury, London.
38.
LeyesdorffL. (2000), ‘The Triple Helix: An evolutionary model of innovation’, Research Policy, Vol 29, No 2, pp 243–255.
39.
LowndesV.SkelcherC. (1998), ‘The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance’, Public Administration, Vol 76, No 2, pp 313–333.
40.
LundvallB-A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
41.
MenardC. (2002), The Economics of Hybrid Organizations, Presidential Address ISNIE 2002, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 29 September, www.isnie.org.
42.
MorrisonD.A. (2004), Marketing to the Campus Crowd, Dearborn, Chicago, IL.
43.
NarulaR. (2003), Globalization and Technology: Interdependence, Innovation Systems and Industrial Policy, Policy Press, Cambridge.
44.
OECD (1999), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
45.
O'GormanC. (2000), ‘Strategy and the small firm’, in EvansD.J.CarterS., eds, Enterprise and the Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy, Pearson Education, Harlow.
46.
OughtonC.LandabasoM.MorganK. (2002), ‘The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 27, pp 97–110.
47.
PickernellD.PackhamG.ThomasB.KeastR., (2008), ‘University Challenge? Innovation policy and SMEs in Welsh economic development policy: Towards a new framework’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 9, No 1, pp 51–62.
48.
ReidP.SchofieldM. (2006), ‘How a regional broker can improve industry demand for university interaction’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 20, No 6, pp 413–420.
49.
RhodesR.A.W. (1997), ‘From marketisation to diplomacy: It's the mix that matters’, Public Policy and Administration, Vol 12, pp 31–50.
50.
SchaefferP.LoveridgeS. (2002), ‘Towards an understanding of types of public–private cooperation’, Public Performance and Management Review, Vol 26, No 2, pp 169–189.
51.
SimmieJ.SennetJ.WoodP.HartD. (2002), ‘Innovation in Europe: A tale of networks, knowledge and trade in five cities’, Regional Studies, Vol 36, No 1, pp 47–64.
52.
SlaughterS. (1988), ‘Academic freedom and the state: Reflections on the uses of knowledge’, Journal of Higher Education, Vol 59, No 3, pp 241–262.
53.
StoreyD.J. (1999), Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London.
54.
WeickK.E. (1990), ‘Organizational culture as a source of high reliability’, Californian Management Review, Vol 29, No 2, pp 112–127.
55.
WrightM.BirleyS.MoseyS., (2004), ‘Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 29, pp 235–246.
56.
Yeh-Yun-LinC. (1998), ‘Success factors of small and medium sized enterprises in Taiwan: An analysis of cases’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 36, No 4, pp 43–56.
