This study evaluates the risk-adjusted performance of three restaurant segments between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2004. The Jensen, the Treynor and the Sharpe indexes were adopted as an analytical framework. The findings here are not entirely consistent with those of Kim and Gu (2003) because they show that the quick-service segment outperforms the other two segments. However, using NASDAQ, NYSE and S&P 500 as benchmarks, this study illustrates that the performance of the economy/buffet segment tops the quick-service and full-service segments. It further indicates that the restaurant industry carries too much unsystematic risk, which it needs to reduce.
ArbelA.GrierP. (1978), ‘The risk structure of the hotel industry’, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol 19, No 2, pp 15–22.
2.
ArtikisP.G. (2002), ‘Evaluation of equity mutual funds operating in the Greek financial market’, Managerial Finance, Vol 28, No 5, pp 27–54.
3.
GuZ. (1994), ‘Hospitality investment risk, return, and performance indexes: A ten-year examination’, Hospitality Research Journal, Vol 17, No 3, pp 17–26.
4.
HanJ.LiangY. (1995), ‘The historical performance of real estate investment trusts’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol 10, No 3, pp 235–262.
5.
JensenM.C. (1968), ‘The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964’, Journal of Finance, Vol 23, pp 389–416.
6.
KimH.GuZ. (2003), ‘Risk-adjusted performance: A sector analysis of restaurant firms’, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, Vol 27, No 2, pp 200–213.
7.
KimH.MattilaA.GuZ. (2002), ‘Performance of hotel real estate investment trusts: A comparative analysis of Jensen Indexes’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol 21, No 1, pp 85–97.
8.
KotlerP.BowenJ.MakensJ. (2005), Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism (4th edition), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
