Economic nationalism is often associated with the mercantilist view. Being nationalist is viewed as non-conventional, particularly in the age of globalization in which cross-border trade and investment are perceived to bring benefits to all participants. The paper questions this notion of economic nationalism. The author argues that in today's context, policy changes that appear to be ‘nationalist’ may not be totally inconsistent with policies advocated by liberals. This description of economic nationalism is applicable to Singapore and Thailand. By means of a case study (involving the Shin Corporation of Thailand and Temasek Holdings Limited of Singapore), the paper shows that the governments did not hesitate to arouse local support to maximize their respective national interests while at the same time remaining active in regional and global initiatives. The decisions of the Thais and Singaporeans reflect the trend towards an increasing discomfort with globalization.
AcharyaA. (1998), ‘Collective identity and conflict management in Southeast Asia’, in AdlerE.BarnettM., eds, Security Communities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2.
AizenmanJ.LeeJ. (2008), ‘Financial versus monetary mercantilism: Long run view of large international reserves hoarding’, The World Economy, Vol 31, No 5, pp 593–611.
3.
AmsdenA. (2001), The Rise of ‘the Rest’: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4.
AndersonB. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London.
5.
ThawnghmungArdeth MaungMyoeMaung Aung (2008), ‘Myanmar in 2007: A turning point in the “roadmap”?’Asian Survey, Vol 48, No 1, pp 13–19.
6.
BakerC. (2005), ‘Pluto-populism: Thaksin and popular politics’, in WarrP., ed, Thailand Beyond the Crisis, RoutledgeCurzon, London and New York.
7.
CaseG. D. L. (2008), ‘Is nationalism good for you?’Foreign Policy, March/April, pp 51–56.
8.
ChangH. J. (2002), Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, Anthem Press, London.
9.
ChongA. (2007), ‘Singapore's political economy, 1997–2007: Strategizing economic assurance for globalization’, Asian Survey, Vol 47, No 6, pp 952–976.
10.
ChowH. K. (2007), ‘Singapore's exchange rate policy: Some implementation issues’, Singapore Economic Review, Vol 52, No 3, pp 445–458.
11.
ChuaB. H. (2007), ‘Singapore in 2006: An irritating and irritated ASEAN neighbor’, Asian Survey, Vol 47, No 1, pp 206–212.
12.
CraneG. T. (1998), ‘Economic nationalism: Bringing the nation back in’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol 27, No 1, pp 55–75.
13.
D'CostaA. P. (2007), Economic Nationalism in Motion: Steel, Auto, and Software Industries in India, Working Paper No 94, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
14.
DentC. M. (2006), ‘The new economic bilateralism in Southeast Asia: Region conver gent or region divergent?’International Relations of the Asia Pacific, Vol 6, No 1, pp 81–111.
15.
FriedmanT. (2005), The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
16.
FunstonJ. (2002), ‘Thailand: Thaksin forever’, Southeast Asian Affairs 2002, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
17.
GellnerE. (1983), Nations and Nationalism, Cornell University Press, New York
18.
GerschenkronA. (1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, A Book of Essays, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19.
GilpinR. (1987), The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
20.
GlassmanJ. (2004), ‘Economic “nationalism” in a post-nationalist era: The political economy of economic policy in post-crisis Thailand’, Critical Asian Studies, Vol 36, No 1, pp 37–64.
21.
HarlenC. M. (1999), ‘A reappraisal of classical economic nationalism and economic liberalism’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol 43, pp 733–744.
22.
HeracleousL. (1999), ‘Privatization: Global trends and implications of the Singapore experience’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol 12, No 5, pp 432–444.
23.
HerderscheeH. (1993), ‘Incentives for exports: The case of Thailand’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol 9, No 3, pp 348–366.
24.
HewisonK. (2000a), ‘Thailand's capitalism before and after the economic crisis’, in RobisonR.BeesonM.JayasuriyaK.KimH. R., eds, Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis, Routledge, London.
25.
HewisonK. (2000b), ‘Resisting globalization: A study of localism in Thailand’, The Pacific Review, Vol 1, No 2, pp 279–296.
26.
HewisonK. (2004), ‘Pathways to recovery: Bankers, business, and nationalism in Thailand’, in GomezE. T.HsiaoHsin-Huang Michael, eds, Chinese Enterprise, Transnationalism, and Identity, RoutledgeCurzon, London/New York.
27.
HirschmanA. (1945/1980), National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
28.
HoC. (2004), ‘Temasek Holdings: Building sustainable value’, speech delivered at the Corporate Associates Lunch, 12 February, Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore.
29.
JeanneO. (2007), ‘International reserves in emerging market countries: Too much of a good thing?’Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol 1, pp 1–55.
30.
JonesD. M.SmithM. L. R. (2007), ‘Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian regional order’, International Security, Vol 32, No 1, pp 148–184.
31.
KaletskyA. (2005), ‘Time to tame the Asian tigers’, The Australian, 14 April.
32.
KazminA. (2007), ‘A setback for Thai democracy: The rise, rule and overthrow of Thaksin Shinawatra’, Asian Affairs, Vol 38, No 2, pp 211–224.
33.
KellyD. (2005), ‘Trade, security and globalization’, in KellyD.GrantW., eds, The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century: Actors, Issues and Regional Dynamics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
34.
KeohaneR.NyeJ. (1989), Power and Interdependence, 2 ed, Harper Collins, New York.
35.
LooneyR. (2004), ‘Thaksinomics: A new Asian paradigm?’Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol 29, No 1, pp 65–85.
36.
LuhulimaC. P. F. (2001), ‘ASEAN's relevance: Has it become questionable?’ in ThanMya, ed, ASEAN: Beyond the Regional Crisis, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
37.
McCargoD. (2005), ‘Network monarchy and legitimacy crisis in Thailand’, The Pacific Review, Vol 18, No 4, pp 499–519.
38.
McCargoD.PathmanandUkrist (2005), The Thaksinization of Thailand, NIAS Press, Copenhagen.
39.
MontesanoM. J. (2002), ‘Thailand in 2001: Learning to live with Thaksin’, Asian Survey, Vol 42, No 1, pp 90–99.
40.
MutebiA. M. (2006), ‘Thailand's independent agencies under Thaksin: Relentless gridlock and uncertainty’, in SinghD.SalazarL. L., eds, Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
41.
NakanoT. (2004), ‘Theorizing economic nationalism’, Nations and Nationalism, Vol 10, No 3, pp 211–229.
42.
NakanoT. (2007), ‘Alfred Marshall's economic nationalism’, Nations and Nationalism, Vol 13, No 1, pp 57–76.
43.
NelsonM. H. (2007), ‘People's Sector Politics' (Kanmueang Phak Prachachon) in Thailand: Problems of Democracy in Ousting Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, Working Paper No 87, Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
44.
NesaduraiH. E. S. (2008), ‘Economic nationalism and the limits of globalization’, in ChongT., ed, Globalization and its Counter-Forces in Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
45.
OhmaeK. (1995), The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies, Free Press, New York.
46.
OnealJ. R.RussettB. M. (1997), ‘The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence and conflict, 1950–1985’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol 41, pp 267–294.
47.
PhongpaichitPasukBakerC. (2004), Thaksin: The Business of Politics, Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai.
48.
PeeblesG.WilsonP. (2000), Economic Growth and Development in Singapore: Past and Future, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
49.
PetrusicM. (2006), ‘Recent development in oil and the national security: CNOOC's failed bid to purchase Unocal’, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 84, No 4, pp 1373–1393.
50.
PhillipsK. (2008), ‘Bubble and bail’, The American Prospect, Vol 19, No 5, p 26.
51.
PolachekS. W. (1980), ‘Conflict and trade’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 24, No 1, pp 57–78.
52.
PowellB. (2005), ‘Unchartered waters’, Time Magazine, 11 July.
53.
RajanR. S.RongolaS. (2008), Asia in the Global Economy: Finance, Trade and Investment, World Scientific, Singapore.
54.
RowleyK. (2006), The Downfall of Thaksin Shinawatra's CEO-State, Austral Policy Forum 06-34A, 9 November, City University of Hong Kong.
55.
SalvatoreD. (2001), International Economics, 7 ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
56.
ShinJ. S. (2005), ‘The role of the state in an increasingly global economy: Implications to Singapore’, Singapore Economic Review, Vol 50, No 1, pp 1–13.
57.
ShulmanS. (2000), ‘Nationalist sources of international economic integration’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol 44, pp 365–390.
58.
SmithA. D. (1983), Theories of Nationalism, 2 ed, Holmes and Meier, New York.
59.
SolingenE. (2005), ‘ASEAN cooperation: The legacy of the economic crisis’, International Relations of the Asia Pacific, Vol 5, No 1, pp 1–29.
60.
SolisM. (2003), ‘The politics of self-restraint: FDI subsidies and Japanese mercantilism’, The World Economy, Vol 26, No 2, pp 153–180.
61.
StiglitzJ. (2002), Globalization and its Discontents, W.W. Norton and Co, New York.
62.
StrangeS. (1996), The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
63.
TejapiraK. (2002), ‘Post-crisis economic impasse and political recovery in Thailand: The resurgence of economic nationalism’, Critical Asian Studies, Vol 34, No 3, pp 323–356.
64.
TonnessonS. (2004), ‘Globalising national states’, Nations and Nationalism, Vol 10, No 1/2, pp 179–194.
65.
WaltzK. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
66.
Woo-CummingsM., ed (1999), The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, New York.
67.
World Bank (1993), The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, New York.
