A Comparison of Three Economic Impact Models for Applied Hospitality and Tourism Research

Abstract

This study examines the differences between three economic impact models: the capacity utilization model (CUM), Regional Economic Models, Inc (REMI) and the impact analysis for planning (IMPLAN) model with a view to providing insights into their applicability for hospitality and tourism educators and researchers. Four databases have been used to compare the results concerning total output, income and employment. The results were most dissimilar for the ‘income’ variable. The difference in income lies in the fact that the three models estimated income in three different ways. The CUM estimated ‘payroll’, REMI estimated ‘disposable personal income’ and IMPLAN estimated ‘value added’. Due to the different income measurements, REMI's income estimates were the highest, while the CUM's were the lowest. This study does not strive to recommend one economic impact model over another; however, it does examine the behaviour of the respective models concerning various data sets and describes the underlying characteristics of the models.

Keywords

economic impact tourism models IMPLAN REMI capacity utilization model (CUM)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

B.H.

(1984), ‘Economic impact: Misleading multiplier’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 11, No 3, pp 517–518.

Aydin

(2007), ‘Florida needs a better method to estimate tourism's economic impact’, Florida TaxWatch Report, Tallahassee, FL, pp 1–59.

Baker

Aydin

(2005), ‘Special report by the Florida TaxWatch Center for Tourism’, in The Impact of Tourism on Florida's Economy: Telling a More Complete Story, Florida TaxWatch Report, Tallahassee, FL.

Bell

Frederick W.

(2006), personal communication, January.

Bonn

M.A.

Bell

F. W.

(1998), ‘The economic value of artificial reefs in northwest Florida’, Technical Report, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL.

Bonn

M.A.

Bell

F.W.

(2003), ‘Florida natural springs and their economic value’, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL.

Clawson

Knetsch

(1971), Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Resources for the Future , The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.

Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis (CCEA) (2003), ‘The 2001 economic impact of Connecticut's travel and tourism industry’, Report, Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

Crihfield

J.B.

Campbell

H.S.

Jr (1992), ‘Evaluating alternative regional planning models’, Growth and Change, Vol 23, pp 521–530.

10.

Deller

S.C.

(1992), ‘A consistent cross-analysis of two regional economic modeling systems: A comparison of REMI and IMPLAN’ Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maine, Orono, ME.

11.

Economic Census, US Census Bureau (2002), ‘2002 Economic Census Geographic Area Series Florida’, last revised 3 January 2006, http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/guide/02EC_FL.HTM.

12.

Fishkind and Associates, Inc (1989), ‘Central Florida tourism: Industry description’, Technical Report prepared for the Greater Orlando/Orange County Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Kissimmee-St Cloud Convention and Visitor Bureau.

13.

Fishkind

and Associates, Inc (2005), personal communication, September.

14.

Frechtling

D.C.

(1994a), ‘Assessing the economic impacts of travel and tourism – introduction to travel economic impact estimation’, in Brent Ritchie

J.R.

Goeldner

C.R.

, eds, Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 359–366.

15.

Frechtling

D.C.

(1994b), ‘Assessing the economic impacts of travel and tourism – measuring economic benefits’, in Brent Ritchie

J.R.

Goeldner

C.R.

, eds, Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 367–392.

16.

Frechtling

D.C.

(1994c), ‘Assessing the economic impacts of travel and tourism – measuring economic costs’, in Brent Ritchie

J.R.

Goeldner

C.R.

, eds, Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 393–402.

17.

IMPLAN (1997), Central NRCS Economists Workshop, Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc, Stillwater, MN.

18.

IMPLAN (1999), IMPLAN Professional; Version 2.0, Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc, Stillwater, MN.

19.

IMPLAN (2007), personal communication with Scott Lindall, 7 May.

20.

Kraybill

D.S.

(1993), ‘Computable general equilibrium analysis at the regional level’, in Microcomputer-Based Input–Output Modeling: Applications to Economic Development, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 125–148.

21.

Kuhbach

Herauf

B.A.

(2005), ‘US travel and tourism satellite accounts for 2001–2004’, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC.

22.

Libreros

Massieu

Meis

(2006), ‘Progress in tourism satellite account implementation and development’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 45, August, pp 83–91.

23.

Lynch

(2000), ‘Analyzing the economic impact of transportation projects using RIMS II, IMPLAN and REMI’, prepared for Office of Research and Special Programs, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

24.

Miller

R.E.

Blair

P.D.

(1985), Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions , Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliff, NY.

25.

Perlich

(2005), Regional Economic Analysis and Impact Models , Bureau of Economic and Business Research, David S. Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

26.

Regional Economic Models, Inc (2005), ‘Model documentation’, Frederick Treyz and George Treyz Regional Economic Models, Inc, Amherst, MA (http://www.remi.com).

27.

REMI (Regional Economic Models, Inc) (2007), personal communication with Adam Cooper, 7 May.

28.

Rickman

D.S.

Schwer

R.K.

(1993), ‘A systematic comparison of the REMI and IMPLAN models: The case of Southern Nevada’, Review of Regional Studies, Vol 23, pp 143–161.

29.

Rickman

D.S.

Schwer

R.K.

(1995a), ‘Multiplier comparisons of IMPLAN and REMI across versions: Illuminating black boxes’, Environment and Planning A, Vol 26, pp 143–151.

30.

Rickman

D.S.

Schwer

R.K.

(1995b), ‘A comparison of the multipliers of IMPLAN, REMI, and RIMS II: Benchmarking ready-made models for comparison’, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol 29, pp 363–374.

31.

Ryan

(2003), ‘The economic impacts of tourism’, in Recreational Tourism: Demand and Impacts, Aspects of Tourism, Second Edition, Multilingual Matters/Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 148–196.

32.

Smeral

(2006), ‘Tourism satellite accounts: A critical assessment’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 45, August, pp 92–98.

33.

Smith

S.L.J.

Wilton

(1997), ‘TSAs and the WTTC/WEFA methodology: Different satellites or different planets?’, Tourism Economics, Vol 3, No 3, p 250.

34.

Stynes

D.J.

(1999), Guidelines for Measuring Visitor Spending , Michigan Tourism Economic Impact Model, http://web4.canr.msu.edu/MGM2/econ/pdf/ecimpvol3.pdf.

35.

Travel Industry Association of America (2005), personal communication with Dr Tien Tian, December.

36.

Treyz

G.I.

(1993), Regional Economic Modeling: A Systematic Approach to Economic Forecasting and Policy Analysis , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

37.

United Nations (1994), ‘Recommendations on tourism statistics’, Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis and World Tourism Organization, United Nations, New York, p 9.

38.

Visit Florida, Inc (2005, 2006), Department of Marketing and Statistics, Tallahassee, FL.

39.

Weisbrod

(1990), ‘REMI and I-O models compared’, Cambridge Systematics, www.edrgroup.com/pages/pdf/REMI-IO.pdfhttp://.