Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper examines the evolutionary process of secondary innovation in a typical Chinese equipment manufacturing firm in the context of globalization and elaborates how to achieve latecomer's advantage from imitation to innovation. Four stages are identified in the process of international manufacturing: the equipment import stage, the production cooperation stage, the R&D cooperation stage and the global operation stage. Technological innovation evolves as follows: from duplicative imitation to creative imitation, and then from exploitative innovation to explorative innovation. Through the evolutionary process, a firm can take advantage of globalization to accumulate knowledge and improve its capabilities, which enable it to upgrade in the global manufacturing network.

Keywords

technological innovation secondary innovation international manufacturing Chinese firm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cho

Lee

(2003), ‘The developmental path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea's semiconductor industry’, R&D Management, Vol 33, No 4, pp 411–423.

Dosi

(1982), ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation’, Research Policy, Vol 11, pp 147–162.

Ernst

Kim

(2002), ‘Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation’, Research Policy, Vol 31, pp 1417–1429.

Lee

Bae

Z.T.

Choi

D.K.

(1988), ‘Technology development processes: A model for a developing country with a global perspective’, R&D Management, Vol 18, No 3, pp 235–250.

Kim

(1980), ‘Stages of development of industrial technology in a less developed country: A model’, Research Policy, Vol 9, No 3, pp 254–277.

Kim

(1997), Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

Mathews

J.A.

(2002), ‘Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol 19, No 4.

OECD (1991), Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

Utterback

Abernathy

(1975), ‘Dynamic model of process and product innovation’, Omega, Vol 3, No 6, pp 639–656.

10.

Utterback

Abernathy

(1978), ‘Patterns of innovation in industry’, Technology Review, Vol 80, No 7, pp 40–47.

11.

X.B.

(1997), ‘The evolutionary process of secondary innovation’, paper presented at the Portland International Conference on Management and Technology, 27–31 July, Portland, OR, Proceedings of PICMET′97, p 183.

12.

X.B.

R.F.

(2006), ‘Latecomer advantage and secondary innovation in the emerging service sector: A developing country perspective’, paper presented at IAMOT 06, 15th International Conference on Management of Technology, 22–26 May, Beijing.

13.

Q.R.

X.B.

(1991), ‘A model of “secondary innovation” process’, paper presented at the Portland International Conference on Management and Technology, 27–31 October, Portland, OR, Proceedings of PICMET′91, pp 622–627.

The Evolutionary Process of Secondary Innovation in the Context of Globalization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References