This empirical study is concerned with university–industry collaboration from a knowledge management perspective. The authors introduce the concepts of ‘enterprise-level core elements’ to define the principle status of an enterprise during university–industry collaboration, and ‘network embeddedness’ as an indication of the closeness of the collaboration. Furthermore, they examine the method of knowledge management. Finally, they use both learning performance and product innovation performance to measure an enterprise's innovation performance.
AdamsJ.D. (1990), ‘Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth’, Political Economy, No 98, pp 673–702.
2.
BlomqvistK.HurmelinnaP.SeppänenR. (2005), ‘Playing the collaboration game right – balancing trust and contracting’, Technovation, No 25, pp 497–504.
3.
BurnsT.StalkerG.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.
4.
ChenC. (2004), ‘The effects of knowledge attributes, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance’, R&D Management, Vol 34, No 3, pp 311–321.
CohenW.FloridaR.GoaR. (1994), ‘University Industry Research Centers in the United States’, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, mimeo.
7.
CohenW.M.LevinthalD.A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, No 1, pp 128–152.
8.
DasT.K.TengB-S. (1998), ‘Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 23, No 3, pp 491–512.
9.
DavenportT.H.PrusakL. (1998), Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. DrejerI.JørgensenB.H. (2005), ‘The dynamic creation of knowledge: Analyzing public–private collaborations’, Technovation, No 25, pp 83–94.
10.
FowlerF.J. (1988), Survey Research Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
11.
FreemanC. (1987), Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
12.
GoesJ.ParkS.H. (1997), ‘Inter-organizational links and innovation: The case of hospital services’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 40, No 3, pp 673–696.
13.
GulatiR. (1995), ‘Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 8, No 1, pp 85–112.
14.
HalawiL.A.McCarthyR.V.AronsonJ.E. (2006), ‘Knowledge management and the competitive strategy of the firm’, The Learning Organization, Vol 13, No 4, pp 384–397.
15.
JaffeA. (1989), ‘Real effects of academic research’, American Economy Review Proceedings, pp 957–970.
16.
KatilaR.AhujaG. (2002), ‘Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction’, Academy of Management Journal, No 45, pp 1183–1194.
17.
KlevorickA.K.LevinR.NelsonR.R. (1995), ‘On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities’, Research Policy, Vol 24, No 2, pp 195–205.
18.
LaursenK.SalterA. (2004), ‘Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?’, Research Policy, No 33, pp 1201–1215.
19.
LawrenceP.L.LorschJ.W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
20.
LeeH.ChoiB. (2003), ‘Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol 20, No 1, pp 179–228.
21.
LiuX. (1999), National Innovation System: Current Situation and Future, Economy & Management Press, Beijing, pp 45–63.
22.
LiuXiaHui (2002), ‘Building a new organizational structure that is beneficial for organizational learning’, Economist, No 9, pp 14–15 [in Chinese].
23.
LiyanageS. (1995), ‘Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks’, Technovation, Vol 15, No 9, pp 553–567.
24.
LuiS.NgoH.HonA. (2005), ‘Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: Mediating roles of interpersonal and inter-organizational trust’, Journal of Business Research, Vol 59, No 4, pp 466–474.
25.
LynnG.S.ReillyR.R.AkgunA.E. (2000), ‘Knowledge management in new product teams: Practices and outcomes’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 47, No 2, pp 221–231.
26.
MansfieldE. (1988), ‘The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: External versus internal technology’, Management Science, Vol 34, No 10, pp 1157–1168.
27.
McAdamR. (2000), ‘Knowledge management as a catalyst for innovation within organizations: A qualitative study’, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol 7, No 4, pp 233–241.
28.
McDonaldD.W.GieserS.M. (1987), ‘Making cooperative research relationships work’, Research Management, Vol 30, No 4, pp 38–42.
29.
MohrJ.NevinR. (1990), ‘Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective’, Journal of Marketing, Vol 54, No 4, pp 36–51.
30.
Mora-ValentinE.M.Montoro-SanchezA.Guerras-MartinL.A. (2004), ‘Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations’, Research Policy, No 33, pp 17–40.
31.
MurrayF. (2004), ‘The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life’, Research Policy, No 33, pp 643–659.
32.
NarinF.HamiltonK.S.OlivastroD. (1997), ‘The increasing link between US technology and public science’, Research Policy, Vol 26, No 3, pp 317–330.
33.
NelsonR.R. (1986), ‘Institutions supporting technical advance in industry’, American Economy Review Proceedings, pp 186–189.
34.
NelsonR.R. (1990), ‘Capitalism as an engine of progress’, Research Policy, No 19, pp 193–214.
35.
NielsenB. (2005), ‘The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances’, Journal of Business Research, No 58, pp 1194–1204.
36.
NohriaN.Garcia-PontC. (1991), ‘Global strategic linkages and industry structure’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 12, Summer Special Issue, pp 105–124.
37.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
38.
OliverC. (1990), ‘Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future directions’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 15, No 2, pp 241–265.
39.
OsbornR.N.BaughnC.C. (1990), ‘Forms of international governance for multinational alliances’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 33, No 3, pp 503–519.
40.
OliverA.L.LiebeskindJ.P. (1998), ‘Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: Implications for studying interorganizational networks’, International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol 27, No 4, pp 76–103.
41.
PavittK. (1984), ‘Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and theory’, Research Policy, No 13, pp 343–373.
42.
SáezC.B.MarcoT.G.ArribasE.H. (2002), ‘Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centers: An empirical study of Spanish firms’, R&D Management, Vol 32, No 4, pp 321–341.
43.
SantoroM.ChakrabartiA. (2002), ‘Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions’, Research Policy, No 31, pp 1163–1180.
44.
SantoroM.D.GopalakrishnanS. (2000), ‘The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, No 17, pp 299–319.
45.
TippinsM. (2003), ‘Implementing knowledge management in academia: Teaching the teachers’, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol 17, No 7, pp 339–345.
46.
TongL. (2006), Research on the Mechanism of Knowledge Management Based on CoPs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
WilliamsT. (2005), ‘Cooperation by design: Structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks’, Journal of Business Research, Vol 58, No 2, pp 223–231.
49.
XuH.XuF. (2004), ‘Talking about knowledge innovation and UNIVERSITY–INDUSTRY-A collaboration’, Journal of S&T Entrepreneur (China), No 7, pp 11–12.
50.
Yli-RenkoH.AutioE.SapienzaH.J. (2001), ‘Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms’, Strategic Management Journal, No 22, pp 587–613.
