Soeharto used the Indonesian bureaucracy to generate rents that could be harvested by ‘insider’ firms, while also encouraging it to extort money from ‘outsider’ firms and individuals. This necessitated incentives that would ensure strong loyalty and minimize internal opposition. Government entities were provided with insufficient budget funding to cover their costs, and their officials were expected to generate cash from illegal activities, making public sector employees financially dependent on corruption. Any employee who opposed this system could expect to be restricted to earning no more than the pitifully low formal salary entitlement. The system therefore became strongly self-reinforcing.
AbdullahI.WhiteB. (2006), ‘Harvesting and housebuilding: Decline and persistence of reciprocal labour in a Javanese village, 1973–2000’, in KoningJ.HüskenF., eds, Rope Walking and Safety Nets: Local Ways of Managing Insecurities in Indonesia, Brill, Leiden and Boston, MA.
2.
AspinallE. (2005), Opposing Soeharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
3.
BuchananJ. M.TullockG. (1962), The Calculus of Consent, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
4.
ClarkD. H.Oey-GardinerM. (1991), ‘How Indonesian lecturers have adjusted to civil service compensation’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 27, No 3, pp 129–141.
5.
GrayC. (1979), ‘Civil service compensation in Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 15, No 1, pp 85–113.
6.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2006), Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996–2005, September, World Bank, Washington, DC, available from Website: www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.
7.
KruegerA. (1974), ‘The political economy of the rent-seeking society’, American Economic Review, Vol 64, No 3, pp 291–303.
8.
Lingkaran Survei Indonesia (2008), Survei Nasional, May, available from Website: http://www.lsi.co.id/.
9.
ManningC.RoesadK. (2006), ‘Survey of recent developments’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 42, No 2, pp 143–170.
10.
McLeodR. H. (2000), ‘Soeharto's Indonesia: A better class of corruption’, Agenda, Vol 7, No 2, pp 99–112.
11.
McLeodR. H. (2005). ‘Survey of recent developments’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 41, No 2, pp 133–157.
12.
McLeodR. H. (2006), ‘Indonesia's new Deposit Guarantee Law’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol 42, No 1, pp 59–78.
13.
PompeS. (2005), The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse, Cornell South-East Asia Program Publications, Ithaca, New York.
14.
PosnerR. A. (1974), ‘Theories of economic regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol 5, pp 335–358.
15.
RieffelL.PramodhawardaniJ. (2007), Out of Business and On Budget: The Challenge of Military Financing in Indonesia, Brookings Institution Press and the US–Indonesian Society, Washington, DC.
16.
SmithT. (1975), ‘Stimulating performance in the Indonesian bureaucracy: Gaps in the administrator's tool kit’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol XXIII, No 4, pp 719–738.
17.
SteeleJ. E. (2005), Wars Within: The Story of Tempo, an Independent Magazine in Soeharto's Indonesia, Equinox Publishing, Jakarta, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
18.
SusantoA. (2006), ‘Safety first: Strategies of managing insecurity among Chinese Indonesians in Yogyakarta’, in KoningJ.HüskenF., eds, Rope Walking and Safety Nets: Local Ways of Managing Insecurities in Indonesia, Brill, Leiden and Boston, MA.
19.
SynnerstromS. (2007), ‘The civil service: Towards efficiency, effectiveness and honesty’, in McLeodR. H.MacIntyreA., eds, Indonesia: Democracy and the Promise of Good Governance, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 159–177.
20.
VelJ. (2008). ‘Reading politics from the book of donations: The moral economy of corruption in Sumba’, in van KlinkenG.BarkerJ., eds, State of Authority: State in Society in Indonesia (forthcoming).
