Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper presents results from a choice experiment (CE) study of anglers' valuations of the characteristics of an angling site at Storsjö-Kapell in the Swedish mountain region. In particular, the study presents value estimates of a dam removal and restoration to natural angling conditions. Values of catch, size and species are considered, as are values of bag limits. Also, value estimates are related to a trip frequency model, making it possible to predict visiting frequency under different scenarios. Thus, the model estimates provide a step towards developing dynamic fisheries management models, as the policies analysed may change the age structure of the stock. In addition to empirical results, the paper contributes a derivation of bounds on willingness to pay (WTP) based on the notion that new visitors may have smaller WTP for a change than those already selecting the site for angling.

Keywords

choice experiments stated preference bioeconomic WTP bounds convenience sample

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamowicz

W.L.

Louviere

Williams

(1994), ‘Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 26, pp 271–292.

Adamowicz

W.L.

Boxall

Williams

Louviere

(1998), ‘Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 80 (February), pp 64–75.

Atkinson

A.C.

Donev

A.N.

(1992), Optimum Experimental Designs, Oxford University Press, New York.

Bateman

I.J.

Carson

R.T.

Day

Hanemann

Hanley

Hett

Jones-Lee

Loomes

Mourato

Özdemiroglu

Pearce

D.W.

Sugden

Swanson

(2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Beggs

Cardell

Hausman

(1981), ‘Assessing the potential demand for electric cars’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol 16, pp 1–19.

Bennett

Blamey

(2001), The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation, New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

Bergland

Magnussen

Navrud

(1995), ‘Benefit transfer: Testing for accuracy and reliability’, in Florax

Nijkamp

Willis

, eds, Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment: Meta Analysis and Benefit Transfer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

Boxall

P.C.

Adamowicz

W.L.

Swait

Williams

Louviere

(1996), ‘A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation’, Ecological Economics, Vol 18, pp 243–253.

Carson

R.T.

Wright

J.L.

Carson

Alberini

Flores

(1994), A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.

10.

Ericsson

Eriksson

Laitila

Sandström

Willebrand

Öhlund

(2005), Delrapport om jakt och fiske – Omfattning, betydelse och förvaltning, FjällMistra-rapport nr. 14, Umeå.

11.

Hausman

J.A.

Leonard

G.K.

McFadden

(1995), ‘A utility consistent combined discrete choice and count data model. Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage’, Journal of Public Economics, Vol 56, pp 1–30.

12.

Lancaster

K.J.

(1966), ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol 74, pp 132–157.

13.

Louviere

J.J.

Hensher

D.A.

Swait

J.D.

(2000), Stated Choice Methods – Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press, New York.

14.

McFadden

D.L.

(1998), ‘Measuring willingness-to-pay for transportation improvements’, in Gärling

Laitila

Westin

, eds, Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 339–364.

15.

Mathews

Desvousges

(1997), ‘Using economic models to inform restoration decisions: The Lavaca Bay, Texas experience’, in Restoration of Lost Human Uses of the Environment, Triangle Economic Research, Washington, DC.

16.

Mitchell

R.C.

Carson

R.T.

(1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

17.

Paulrud

Dalin

P.-E.

(2001), ‘Sportfisket i Kaitum -en rapport om sportfiskarna, sportfisket och dess samhällsekonomiska värde’, Arbetsrapport 305, Institutionen för Skogsekonomi, Umeå.

18.

Paulrud

Laitila

(2004), ‘Valuation of management policies for sport fishing on Sweden's Kaitum River’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol 47, pp 863–879.

19.

Swedish Board of Fisheries (2006), Resurs- och miljööversikt: Fiskbestånd och miljö i hav och sötvatten, Fiskeriverket, Göteborg (in Swedish).

Anglers' Valuation of Water Regulation Dam Removal for the Restoration of Angling Conditions at Storsjö-Kapell

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References