Government support for major sporting events is usually predicated on their assumed economic benefits. Yet there has been little parallel consideration of their potential environmental costs, at a time when the same governments are citing the importance of sustainable development. Environmental performance of major sporting events has hitherto been judged, if at all, on qualitative, activity and procedural criteria, rather than by attempting to estimate the overall impact of an event on measurable externalities. This paper examines the UK round of the 2004 World Rally Championship, using environmental accounting techniques to estimate its economic and environmental impacts on its host region.
CollinsA.FlynnA.MundayM.RobertsA. (2005), Exploring the Environmental Consequences of Major Sporting Events: The 2003/04 FA Cup Final, Theoretical Advances in Tourism Economics, 18–19 March 2005, University of Évora, Portugal,
4.
DCMS (2004), UK Tourism Satellite Account – First Steps Report, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, www.culture.gov.uk.
5.
DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999), A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development in the United Kingdom, Cmnd. 4345, TSO, London.
6.
DTI (Department for Trade and Industry) (1998), National Air Emissions Inventory, UK Greenhouse Gas Inventory, Digest of UK Energy Statistics, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual IPCC 1996.
7.
Econactive Ltd (2005) Evaluation of the 2004 Wales Rally of Great Britain, report for Welsh Development Agency, www.wda.co.uk.
8.
Environmental Protection Agency (2000), The Lean and Green Supply Chain: A Practical Guide for Materials Managers and Supply Chain Managers to Reduce Costs and Improve Environmental Performance, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov.
9.
EREC (Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Clearinghouse) (1998), Renewable Energy at the Olympics, DOE/GO-10098-499, September 1998, revised August 2000, accessed at http://greennature.com/article632.html.
10.
FergusonL.McGregorP.SwalesJ.TurnerK.YinY. (2005), ‘Incorporating sustainability indicators into a computable general equilibrium model of the Scottish economy’, Economic Systems Research, Vol 17, No 2, pp 103–140.
11.
GetznerM. (1999), ‘Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources’, Environmental Management and Health, Vol 10, No 3, pp 170–176.
12.
Greenpeace (2000a), The Toxic Waste Sydney Can't Lose, Olympic Briefing, August 2000, www.greenpeace.org.au.
13.
Greenpeace (2000b), Greenpeace Olympic Environmental Guidelines – A Guide to Sustainable Events, September 2000, http://www.greenpeace.org.au.
14.
Greenpeace (2004), Athens 2004 Disqualified from Green Olympics, Press Release 29 July 2004, www.greenpeace.org.
15.
de HaanM.KeuningS.J. (1996), ‘Taking the environment into account: The NAMEA approach’, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol 42, No 2, pp 131–148.
16.
HarrisR.AyingL. (1998), ‘Input–output modelling of the urban and regional economy: The importance of external trade’, Regional Studies, Vol 32, No 9, pp 851–862.
17.
HillerH. (1998), ‘Assessing the impact of mega-events: A linkage model’, Current Issues in Tourism, Vol 1, No 1, pp 47–57.
18.
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (2004), The Sustainable Development Strategy: Illusion or Reality? Thirteenth Report of Session 2003–04 Volume II, The Stationery Office, London.
19.
International Olympic Committee (1996), Olympic Movement's Agenda 21: Sport for Sustainable Development, IOC Sport and Environment Commission, Lausanne.
20.
JonesC. (2001), ‘Mega events and the host economy: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup’, International Journal of Tourism Research, Vol 3, pp 241–251.
21.
JonesC.MundayM. (2006), Exploring the Environmental Consequences of Tourism: A UK Regional Case, paper for Western Regional Science Association 2006 Conference, 22–25 February 2006, Santa Fe, NM.
22.
KiddB. (1995), Toronto's Skydome: The World's Greatest Entertainment Centre in BaleJ.MoenO., eds, The Stadium and the City, Keele University Press, Keele, pp 175–196.
23.
LenskyjH. (2002), Best Olympics Ever? The Social Impacts of Sydney 2000, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
24.
LeontiefW. (1970), ‘Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input–output approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 52, No 3, pp 262–271.
25.
London 2012 (2005), London 2012 Candidate File: Theme 5 – Environment and Meteorology, London 2012, www.london2012.org.
26.
MaddenJ. (1998), Estimating the Economic Impact of the Sydney Olympic Games, 38th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, 28 August – 1 September 1998, Vienna.
NelmsC.RusselA.LenceB. (2005), ‘Assessing the performance of sustainable technologies for building projects’, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 32, No 1, pp 114–128.
29.
OECD, The European Commission, United Nations and World Tourism Organization (2001) Tourism Satellite Account: Recommended Methodological Framework, joint publication, OECD, Paris.
30.
OECD (2004), ‘Measuring sustainable development integrated economic, environmental and social frameworks: Accounting for sustainable development: The NAMEA-based approach’, OECD Statistics Sources & Methods, No 4, September, pp 210–227.
OldsK. (1998), ‘Urban mega-events, evictions and housing rights: The Canadian case’, Current Issues in Tourism, Vol 1, No 1, pp 2–46.
33.
PattersonM.McDonaldG. (2004), How Clean and Green is New Zealand Tourism? Lifecycle and Future Environmental Impacts, Landcare Research Science Series No 24, Manaaki Whenua Press, Canterbury.
34.
REWARD (2003a), Emerging Solutions in Sustainable Development Strategy for the Regions of England and Wales, see www.reward-uk.org.
35.
REWARD (2003b), Resource Productivity and Development: A Baseline Assessment, see www.reward-uk.org.
36.
REWARD (2003c), Key Industrial Environmental Pressures – Air Emissions and Energy Use, see www.reward-uk.org.
REWARD (2003e), Key Industrial Environmental Pressures – Water Use, see www.reward-uk.org.
39.
RossA. (2005), ‘The UK approach to delivering sustainable development in government: A case study in joined-up working’, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol 17, No 1, pp 27–49.
40.
SolbergH. (2002), ‘Cultural prescription: The European Commission's listed events regulation – over reaction?’, Culture, Sport, Society, Vol 5, No 2, pp 1–28.
41.
TurnerK. (1992), ‘Speculations on weak and strong sustainability’, CSERGE Working Paper GEC-1992-26, http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/.
42.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43.
Welsh Assembly Government (2004), The Sustainable Development Action Plan 2004–2007, Welsh Assembly Government, www.wales.gov.uk.
44.
Welsh Development Agency (2003), Minister Announces ‘Double Boost’ for Welsh Auto Industry, press release, 6 November 2003, www.wda.co.uk.
