This article first identifies the principal forces that impact on and shape entrepreneurially-oriented higher education institutions (HEIs) in South Africa, and then analyses the degree to which those institutions have succeeded in becoming entrepreneurial. The results reveal that South Africa's HEIs are still in the initial phases of entrepreneurial development. This is attributable largely to factors particular to a developing country in a social transformational phase and faced with restricted social and economic capital.
AdamsF. (2006), ‘Managerialism and higher education governance: Implications for South African Universities?’, South African Journal of Higher Education, Vol 20, No 1, pp 3–14.
2.
AllenT.O'SheaR. (2005), ‘Paper series on Academic Entrepreneurship’, ESD News, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, http://esd.mit.edu/Headline/academic_entrepreneurship.html, accessed 4 September 2007. AllighanG. (1960), Curtain-Up on South Africa: Presenting a National Drama, T.V. Boardman & Company, London.
BondJ. (1963), They Were South Africans, Oxford University Press, London.
5.
BrawerB. (1998), ‘Academic entrepreneurship in higher education’, CELCEE Digest, No 98–3.
6.
ChellE. (2001), Entrepreneurship: Globalisation, Innovation and Development, Thomson Learning, Cumbria.
7.
ChristiansenI.M.SlammertL. (2006), ‘A multi-faceted approach to research development (II): Supporting communities of practice’, South African Journal of Higher education, Vol 20, No 1, pp 15–28.
8.
CovinJ.G.SlevinD.P. (1989), ‘Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 10, pp 75–87.
9.
ElfenbeinD.W. (2005), Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
10.
FrederickH.H.McIloryD. (1999), ‘New Zealand and its competitors in the knowledge economy’, Telematics and Informatics, Vol 16, pp 177–217.
11.
HannonP.D. (2005), ‘Graduate entrepreneurship in the UK: Defining a research and education policy framework’, paper presented at the 28th National Conference of the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Blackpool, 1–3 November.
12.
HarberA.LandmanB. (1995), A–Z of South African Politics: The Essential Handbook, Penguin, London.
13.
HurmelinnaP.KylaheikoK.JauhiainenT. (2005), ‘The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations: Theoretical re-appraisal and empirical analysis’, Technovation, Vol 27, No 3, pp 133–144.
14.
ImendaS.N. (2006), ‘Knowledge production as a function of the individual institution's idea of a university’, South African Journal of Higher Education, Vol 20, No 2, pp 245–260.
15.
JaffeA.LernerJ.SternS.ThursbyM. (2007), ‘Academic science and entrepreneurship: Dual engines of growth?’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol 63, No 4, pp 573–576.
16.
JesselynM.MitchellB. (2006), ‘Entrepreneurship education in South Africa: A nationwide survey’, Education and Training, Vol 48, No 5, pp 348–359.
KahnM. (2007), ‘Where does South Africa stand in the internationalization of research development?’, South African Innovator, Vol 5, pp 18–19.
19.
KaplanD. (2004), ‘Technology and the growth of manufactured exports: Assessing South Africa's performance and policy’, paper presented at DRUID Summer Conference, Elsinore, 14–16 June.
20.
KrollH.LiefnerI. (2007), ‘Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialization in a transforming economy – evidence from three universities in China’, Technovation, proof version published online at www.sciencedirect.com, June 2007, print edition forthcoming.
21.
KrügerD.W. (1957), The Age of the Generals, Dagbreek, Johannesburg.
22.
LarsenK.MorrisR.MartinJ.P. (2002), ‘Trade in educational services: Trends and emerging issues’, The World Economy, Vol 25, pp 849–868.
23.
LumpkinG.T.DessG.G. (1996), ‘Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 21, pp 135–172.
24.
MillerD. (1983), ‘Three correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms’, Management Science, Vol 29, No 7, pp 770–791.
25.
MokK.H. (2005), ‘Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong’, Research Policy, Vol 34, pp 537–554.
26.
MRC Innovation Centre (2006), Guide for Inventors, Section H: Funding for Commercialisation of Research, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, http://innovation.mrc.ac.za, accessed 24 February 2006.
27.
NiewenhuizenC.KroonJ. (2002), ‘Identification of entrepreneurial success factors to determine the content of entrepreneurial subjects’, South African Journal of Education, Vol 22, No 1, pp 24–27.
28.
RobertsD.V.GouwsS.M.Van der MerweA. (2006), ‘Funding for success in higher education: A mechanism to meet national challenges’, South African Journal of Higher Education, Vol 20, No 2, pp 219–231.
29.
SajevaM.GatelliD.TarantolaS.HollandersH. (2005), Methodology Report on European Innovation Scoreboard 2005, European Commission, Brussels.
30.
ShackletonJ.R. (2003), ‘Opening up trade in higher education’, World Economics, Vol 4, No 4, pp 55–77.
31.
South African Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology (2002), South Africa's National R&D Strategy: The Changing Face of R&D Within South African Public Sector Research, Government Printers, Pretoria.
32.
SpinelliS.TimmonsJ.A. (2003), New Venture Creation, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
33.
StowskyJ. (2003), ‘Secrets to shield or share? New dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age’, Research Policy, Vol 33, pp 257–269.
34.
Van StadenE.L. (2006), ‘Entrepreneuralism and innovation within a university of technology: Contribution of higher education institutions’, paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Pretoria, 2–3 October.
35.
ZahraS.A.CovinJ.G. (1995), ‘Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 10, No 1, pp 43–58.
36.
ZhouyingJ. (2005), ‘Driving force for sustainable development: Principles of harmony and balance’, in AmidonM.FormicaP.Mercier-LaurientE., eds, Knowledge Economics: Emerging Principles, Practices and Policies, University of Tartu, Tartu.
37.
ZourekH. (2006), ‘We cannot afford not to deliver on innovation’, European Innovation, p 3.
