HarrisonR. W.BoccalettiS., and HouseL. (2004), ‘Risk perceptions of urban Italian and United States consumers for genetically modified foods’, AgBioForum, Vol 7, No 4, pp 195–201.
2.
LuskJ. L.TraillW. B.HouseL. O.ValliC.JaegerS. R.MooreM., and MorrowB. (2006), ‘Comparative advantage in demand: Experimental evidence of preferences for genetically modified food in the United States and European Union’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 57, No 1, pp 1–21.
3.
OnyangoB.GovindasamyR., and NaygaR.Jr (2004), Measuring U.S. Consumer Preferences for Genetically Modified Foods Using Choice Modeling Experiments: The Role of Price, Product Benefits and Technology, Working Paper No WP1104-017, Food Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
4.
GoldingM. C.LongC. R.CarmellM. A.HannonG. J., and WesthusinM. E. (2006), ‘Suppression of prion protein in livestock by RNA interference’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol 103, No 14, pp 5285–5290.
5.
KociskoD. A.CaugheyW. S.RaceR. E.RoperG.CaugheyB., and MorreyJ. D. (2006), ‘A porphyrin increases survival time of mice after intracerebral prion infection’, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Vol 50, No 2, pp 759–761.
6.
LuhrK. M.NordströmE. K.LöwP.LjunggrenH. G.TaraboulosA., and KristenssonK. (2004), ‘Scrapie protein degradation by cysteine proteases in CD11c+ dendritic cells and GT1-1 neuronal cells’, Journal of Virology, Vol 78, No 9, pp 4776–4782.
7.
SutouS.KudoT., and TairaK. (2004), ‘Knock-out of the mouse prion gene Prp-p by RNA interference (RNAi) in cultured mammalian cells’, Výzkum v Chovu Skotu, Vol 46, Special Issue, pp 173–175.
8.
GuoHuaYuJianQuanChenHuiQingYuSiGuoLiuJuanChenXuJunXuHongYingShaXuFengZhangGuoXiangWuShaoFuXu, and GuoXiangCheng (2006), ‘Functional disruption of the prion protein gene in cloned goats’, Journal of General Virology, Vol 87, No 4, pp 1019–1027.
9.
ColquhounI. J.le GallG.ElliottK. A.MellonF. A., and MichaelA. J. (2006), ‘Shall I compare thee to a GM potato?’Trends in Genetics, Vol 22, No 10, pp 525–528.
10.
RauscherG. M.SmartC. D.SimkoI.BonierbaleM.MaytonH.GreenlandA., and FryW. E. (2006), ‘Characterization and mapping of RPi-ber, a novel potato late blight resistance gene from Solanum berthaultii’, TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol 112, No 4, pp 674–687.
11.
de MenezesS. M.TillmannM. A. A.DodeL. B., and VillelaF. A. (2004), ‘Detection of soybean genetically modified for tolerance of glyphosate based on the activity of enzymes’, Revista Brasileira de Sementes, Vol 26, No 2, pp 150–155.
12.
NorsworthyJ. K. (2004), ‘Tolerance of a glyphosate-resistant soybean to late-season glyphosate applications’, Weed Technology, Vol 18, No 2, pp 454–457.
13.
AltJ. L.FehrW. R.WelkeG. A., and SandhuD. (2005), ‘Phenotypic and molecular analysis of oleate content in the mutant soybean line M23’, Crop Science, Vol 45, No 5, pp 1997–2000.
14.
FehrW. R., and CurtissC. F. (2004), ‘Breeding for fatty acid composition of soybean oil’Proceedings of VII World Soybean Research Conference, IV International Soybean Processing and Utilization Conference, III Congresso Brasileiro de Soja (Brazilian Soybean Congress), 29 February–5 March, Foz do Iguassu, Brazil, pp 815–821.
15.
DistelfeldA.UauyC.FahimaT., and DubcovskyJ. (2006), ‘Physical map of the wheat high-grain protein content gene Gpc-B1 and development of a high-throughput molecular marker’, New Phytologist, Vol 169, No 4, pp 753–763.
16.
UauyC.BrevisJ. C., and DubcovskyJ. (2006), ‘The high grain protein content gene Gpc-B1 accelerates senescence and has pleiotropic effects on protein content in wheat’, Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol 57, No 11, pp 2785–2794.
17.
HedleyH. A. (2001), ‘International marketing of genetically enhanced grains and oilseeds: Opportunities and challenges’Dealing With Genetically Modified Crops, Symposium presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 25–28 April 2000, San Diego, CA, pp 18–24.
18.
QiX.BakhtS.LeggettM.MaxwellC.MeltonR., and OsbournA. (2004), ‘A gene cluster for secondary metabolism in oat: Implications for the evolution of metabolic diversity in plants’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol 101, No 21, pp 8233–8238.
19.
CoeE. H., and SchaefferM. L. (2005), ‘Genetic, physical, maps, and database resources for maize’, Maydica, Vol 50, No 3/4, pp 285–303.