This paper uses the ‘quick and dirty’ travel cost method (TCM) to generate a range of estimates of one part of the environmental value of the Australian Alps: the recreation use value (RUV). Data for the study were collected during 2001/02 from 4,791 visitor surveys which provided information on 18,480 individuals who were visiting seven different regions of the Australian Alps across three states. The range of estimates is between $10 billion and $200 billion – that range varying across a variety of plausible travel costs and other research judgements.
ABS (1996), Census of Population and Housing, unpublished census data purchased from Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
2.
Australian Institute of Alpine Studies (2004), Map of the Australian Alps National Parks, www.aias.org.au/resources/alps.html, retrieved 24 May.
3.
BockstaelN.E.StrandI.E. (1987), ‘The effect of common sources of regression error on benefit estimates’, Land Economics, Vol 63, No 1, pp 11–20.
4.
BrownG.MendelsohnR. (1984), ‘The hedonic travel cost method’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 66, pp 427–433.
5.
BullT. (1994), Estimating Recreation Use Benefits: A Case Study of Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, Honours thesis, Department of Economics, Australian National University, Canberra.
6.
CarterM.VanclayF.M.HundloeT.J. (1988), Economic and Socio-Economic Impacts of the Crown of Thorns Starfish on the Great Barrier Reef, Report to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Institute of Applied Environmental Research, Griffith University, Brisbane.
7.
CaulkinsP.P.BishopR.C.BouwesN.W. (1985), ‘Omitted cross-price variable biases in the linear travel cost model: Correcting common misperceptions’, Land Economics, Vol 61, pp 182–187.
8.
CaulkinsP.P.BishopR.C.BouwesN.W. (1986), ‘The travel cost model for lake recreation: A comparison to two methods for incorporating site quality and substitution effects’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 8, pp 291–297.
9.
Centre for South Australian Economic Studies (1993), The Economic Significance of Alpine Resorts, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
CloughP.W.J.MeisterA.D. (1991), ‘Allowing for multiple-site visitors in travel cost analysis’, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 32, No 2, pp 115–125.
12.
CommonM.BullT.StoecklN. (1999), ‘The travel cost method: An empirical investigation of Randall's Difficulty’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol 43, No 4, pp 457–477.
13.
CommonM.S. (1973), ‘A note on the use of the Clawson method for the evaluation of recreation site benefits’, Regional Studies, Vol 7, pp 401–407.
14.
CommonM.S.McKenneyD.W. (1994), ‘Investigating the reliability of a hedonic travel cost model: A Monte Carlo approach’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol 24, pp 358–372.
15.
Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing (1999), Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA) – SLA aria 99, data file, www.health.gov.au/ari/aria.htm#read.
16.
CooperJ.LoomisJ. (1989), ‘Pooled time-series cross-section travel-cost methods: Testing whether recreation behaviour is stable over time’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 12, No 2, pp 161–171.
17.
DeatonA.MuellbauerJ. (1980), Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, New York.
18.
FletcherJ.J.AdamowiczW.L.Graham-TomasiT. (1990), ‘The travel cost model of recreation demand: Theoretical and empirical issues’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 12, No 1, pp 119–147.
19.
FreemanA.M. (1979), Theoretical Basis of Empirical Approaches to Benefit Measurement, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Graham-TomasiT.AdamowiczW.FletcherJ. (1990), ‘Errors in truncation in approximations to expected consumer surplus’, Land Economics, Vol 66, No 1, pp 50–55.
22.
GreeneW.H. (1993), Econometric Analysis, 2nd edition, Macmillan, New York.
23.
HarbergerA.C. (1971), ‘Three basic postulates of applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol 9, pp 785–797.
24.
HaspelA.E.JohnsonF.R. (1982), ‘Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation’, Land Economics, Vol 58, pp 364–372.
25.
HellersteinD.M. (1991), ‘Using count data models in travel cost analysis with aggregate data’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 73, No 3, pp 860–866.
26.
HellersteinD.M. (1992a), ‘The treatment of non-participants in travel cost analysis and other demand models’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 8, pp 1999–2004.
27.
HellersteinD.M. (1992b), ‘Estimating consumer surplus in the censored linear model’, Land Economics, Vol 68, No 1, pp 83–92.
28.
KerrG. N.SharpB. M. H.GoughJ. D. (1986). ‘The economic benefits of Mount Cook National Park’, Lincoln Papers in Resource Management, No 12, Centre for Resource Management, Canterbury.
29.
KerrN.SharpM.H., eds (1985), Valuing the Environment: Economic Theory and Applications, Centre for Resource Management, Canterbury.
30.
KlingC.L. (1988), ‘The reliability of estimates of environmental benefits from recreation demand models’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 70, pp 892–901.
31.
KnapmanB.StanleyO. (1991), A Travel Cost Analysis of the Recreation Use Value of Kakadu National Park, Consultancy Report for the Resource Assessment Commission, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
32.
KnapmanB.StanleyO. (1993), ‘A travel cost analysis of Kakadu National Park’, in Building a Research Base in Tourism, Proceedings of the National Conference on Tourism Research, Bureau of Tourism Research, Canberra.
33.
KnapmanB.StoecklN. (1995), ‘Recreation user fees: An Australian empirical example’, Tourism Economics, Vol 1, No 1, pp 5–15.
34.
KPMG Consulting (1994), New South Wales Alpine Industry: Economic Impact Study, KPMG Management Consulting, Adelaide.
LeuschnerW.A.CookP.S.RoggenbuckJ.W.OderwaldR.G. (1987), ‘A comparative analysis for wilderness user fees policy’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 19, No 2, pp 101–111.
37.
MaddalaG.S. (1992), Introduction to Econometrics, Macmillan, New York.
38.
McConnellK.E. (1975), ‘Some problems in estimating the demand for outdoor recreation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 57, No 2, pp 330–334.
39.
McConnellK.E. (1985), ‘The economics of outdoor recreation’, in KneeseA.V.SweenyJ.L., eds, Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Vol 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
40.
McConnellK.E. (1990), ‘Double counting in hedonic travel cost models’, Land Economics, Vol 66, No 2, pp 121–127.
41.
McConnellK.E. (1992), ‘Model building and judgement: Implications for benefit transfers with travel cost methods’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 695–700.
42.
McKeanJ.R.RevierC.F. (1990), ‘An extension of “Omitted cross-price variable biases in the linear travel cost model: Correcting common misperceptions”’, Land Economics, Vol 66, No 4, pp 430–436.
43.
McKeanJ.R.JohnsonD.M.WalshR.G. (1995), ‘Valuing time in travel cost demand analysis: An empirical investigation’, Land Economics, Vol 71, No 1, pp 96–105.
44.
MoreyE.R.RoweR.D.WatsonM. (1993), ‘A repeated nested logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 75, No 3, pp 578–592.
45.
MulesT.FaulksP.StoecklN.CegielskiM. (2003), The Economic Values of Tourism in the Australian Alps, Final Report on Work Commissioned by the Australian Alps Liaison Committee and CRC for Sustainable Tourism. University of Canberra, Canberra.
46.
RandallA. (1994), ‘A difficulty with the travel cost methodology’, Land Economics, Vol 70, No 1, pp 88–96.
47.
Resource Assessment Commission (1992), Forest and Timber Final Inquiry Report, Vol 2b, Appendix U, Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra.
48.
SmithV.K. (1989), ‘Taking stock of progress with travel cost recreation demand methods: Theory and implementation’, Marine Resource Economics, Vol 6, pp 279–330.
49.
SmithV.K. (1993), ‘Welfare effects, omitted variables, and the extent of the market’, Land Economics, Vol 69, No 2, pp 121–131.
50.
SmithV.K.KaoruY. (1990), ‘Signals or noise? Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 72, pp 419–433.
51.
SmithV.K.KoppR.J. (1980), ‘The spatial limits of the travel cost recreational demand model’, Land Economics, Vol 56, No 1, pp 64–71.
52.
StoecklN. (1998), Pricing and Functional Form in the Travel Cost Model: A Monte Carlo and Empirical Analysis, unpublished PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
53.
StoecklN. (2003a), ‘Measurement error and functional form: Implications for welfare estimates’, Applied Economics Letters, Vol 10, pp 259–270.
54.
StoecklN. (2003b), ‘A “quick and dirty” travel cost model’, Tourism Economics, Vol 9, No 3, pp 325–335.
55.
StoecklN.KnapmanB. (1998), ‘Environmental valuation, tourism economics and the travel cost method’, in Van WelC.QuigginJ., eds, Contemporary Issues in Australian Economics, Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton.
56.
TriceA.WoodS.E. (1958), ‘Measurement of recreation benefits’, Land Economics, Vol 34, pp 195–207.
57.
UlphA.M.ReynoldsI.K. (1981), An Economic Evaluation of National Parks, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies Report R/R4, Australian National University, Canberra.
58.
WalshR. G. (1986), Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs, Venture Publishing, Pennsylvania State College, University Park.
59.
WalshR.G.GillmanR.A.LoomisJ.B. (1981), Wilderness Resource Economics: Recreation Use and Preservation Values, Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Boulder, CO.
60.
WilligR.D. (1976), ‘Consumer surplus without apology’, American Economic Review, Vol 66, No 4, pp 589–597.
61.
WillisK.G. (1990), ‘Valuing non-market wildlife commodities: An evaluation and comparison of benefits and costs’, Applied Economics, Vol 22, No 1, pp 13–30.
62.
WillisK.G.GarrodG. (1991), ‘Valuing open access recreation on inland waterways: On-site recreation surveys and selection effects’, Regional Studies, Vol 25, No 6, pp 511–524.
63.
WoodfieldA.CowieD. (1977), ‘The Milford Track: Valuation of estimates of a recreation good’, Australian Journal of Agricultural Eonomics, Vol 21, No 2, pp 97–110.
