This paper is based on experiences with remedial online learning from a national collaboration initiative in the Netherlands involving the University of Amsterdam, Erasmus Rotterdam University and Maastricht University (www.web-spijkeren.nl). The central question is how prior knowledge tests and online remedial summer courses can contribute to mitigating the problems of heterogeneous student enrolment. Although the insights gathered for the paper are from pilots for first-year Bachelor's programmes, the guidance they provide on how to implement an online summer course programme successfully should prove valuable to other organizations.
AbdullahS. (2003), ‘Student modelling by adaptive testing – a knowledge-based approach’, dissertation, University of Kent, Canterbury.
2.
BryantS.KhaleJ.SchaferB. (2005), ‘Distance education: A review of the contemporary literature’, Issues in Accounting Education, Vol 20, No 3, pp 255–272.
3.
DittrichK.FrederiksM. (2005), ‘Accreditatie in Nederland en Vlaanderen: Een eerste balans' [’Accreditation in the Netherlands and Flanders: A first balance’], Tijdschrift van Hoger Onderwijs, Vol 1.
FalmagneJ.CosynE.DoignonJ.-P.ThiéryN. (2003), The Assessment of Knowledge, in Theory and Practice, Technical Report MBS 03–08, Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA.
6.
GunawardenaC.LoweC.AnderssonT. (1997), ‘Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol 17, pp 397–431.
7.
KaperW.BlokG.BrouwerN.WielandA. (2005), Evaluatieprotocol voor flexibel onderwijs bij heterogene instroom [Evaluation Protocol for Flexible Education of Heterogenous Students], Universiteit van Amsterdam, Universiteit Maastricht, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam.
8.
KeeganD. (2002), ‘Definition of distance education’, in Distance Education: Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Pearson Custom Publishing, Boston, MA.
9.
MarshallG. (1999), ‘Exploring assessment’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol 4, No 3, pp 313–329.
10.
McDowellL. (2004), Formative Assessment Using Testing Facilities in Blackboard: Principles and Strategies, Recap Series, University of Northumbria, Newcastle.
MoustJ.BouhuijsP.SchmidtH. (2002), Problem-Based Learning: A Student Guide, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
13.
Onderwijsraad (2005), ‘Helft Nederland Hoogopgeleid door ander Hoger Onderwijs' [’Half of Dutch population are being educated by a different higher educational system’], Press Release, Onderwijsraad (Education Council of the Netherlands), Den Haag, www.onderwijsraad.nl/pdfdocs/persbericht_de_helft_van_nederland_hoogopgeleid.pdf.
14.
ParkinM.BadeR. (2004), Foundations of Economics, 2nd edition, Pearson, Boston, MA.
15.
PrinsJ. (1997), ‘Studieuitval in het wetenschappelijk onderwijs. Studentkenmerken en opleidingskenmerken als verklaring voor studieuitval’ [‘Student drop-out in scientific education: Student and programme characteristics as an explanation of drop-out’], dissertation, University Press, Nijmegen.
16.
RientiesB.WoltjerG. (2004), ‘Regular on-line assessment, motivation and learning’, Meteor Research Memorandum, RM04030, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht.
17.
RientiesB.DijkstraJ.RehmM.TempelaarD.BlokG. (2005b), ‘Online bijspijkeronderwijs in de praktijk’ [‘Online remedial teaching in practice’], Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, Vol 4, pp 239–253.
18.
RientiesB.RehmM.DijkstraJ. (2005a), ‘Remedial online teaching in theory and practice: Online summer course – balance between summer and course’, in GossH., ed, Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Maintaining the Momentum?, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society of Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Teaching and Leaning Support Services, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, pp 569–576.
19.
RoblyerM.WienckeW. (2003), ‘Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses’, American Journal of Distance Education, Vol 17, No 2, pp 77–98.
20.
RonteltapF.van der VeenJ. (2002), Samenwerkend leren met ICT, ICT in het hoger onderwijs: Stand van zaken [Collaboration with ICT in Higher Education], IVLOS, Universiteit Utrecht, and ICLON, Universiteit Leiden.
21.
SchellensT.ValckeM. (2005), ‘Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing?’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 21, pp 957–975.
22.
SchellensT.ValckeM. (2006), ‘Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups’, Computers and Education, Vol 46, No 4, pp 349–370.
23.
SegersM. (2004), ‘Assessment en leren als een twee-eenheid: Onderzoek naar de impact van assessment op leren’ [’Assessment and learning as one: Research on the impact of assessment on learning’], Tijdschrift van Hoger Onderwijs, Vol 4, 2004, pp 188–219.
24.
TempelaarD.De GruijterD. (2005), Computertoetsing bij de Emerge-instellingen, TU Delft.
25.
Tweede Fase Adviespunt (2005), Zeven jaar Tweede Fase, een balans [Seven years of Second Phase in Secondary Education in the Netherlands], Tweede Fase Adviespunt, Den Haag.
26.
Van LeijenM.WielandA.RientiesB. (2005), Quick scan onderzoek naar de initiatieven elders [Quick Scan Research of Remedial Teaching Initiatives], University of Amsterdam, University of Maastricht and Erasmus UniversityRotterdam.
27.
VrasidasC.McIsaacM. (1999), ‘Factors influencing interaction in an online course’, American Journal of Distance Education, Vol 13, No 3, pp 22–36.
28.
VrasidasC.ZembylasM. (2003), ‘The nature of technology-mediated interaction in globalised distance education’, International Journal of Training and Development, Vol 7, No 4, pp 271–286.
29.
VriesdeR.Van der VeldenR. (2005), Brug of Kloof? De ervaringen van HAVO- en VWO-schoolverlaters over de aansluiting tussen VO en HO vóór en ná de invoering tweede fase VO [Experiences with High-School Graduates and Connection to Higher Education Before and After Second Phase High-School], Researchcentrum voor Onderwijs en Arbeidsmarkt, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht.
30.
VygotksyL. (1978), Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31.
de WeverB.SchellensT.ValkeM.KeervanH. (2006), ‘Content analysis schemes to analyse transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review’, Computers and Education, Vol 46, pp 6–28.
