The Role of Metacognition in Business Education

Abstract

‘Metacognition’, or the set of skills indicated as critical thinking in the domain of business education, constitutes an important aim in many educational programmes. At the same time, empirical studies demonstrate that teaching metacognitive skills is much harder than teaching cognitive ones. Moreover, the assessment of metacognitive skills poses unique problems. This study focuses on the assessment of metacognition (critical thinking) by means of a recently developed self-report instrument, the ‘Awareness of Independent Learning Inventory’, or AILI. Participants are undergraduate students in a business and economics programme. The study investigates the structure of metacognition, its relationship with background factors and its influence on course performance.

Keywords

critical thinking metacognition skills assessment AILI

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bransford

J.D.

, eds (2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Braun

N.M.

(2004), ‘Critical thinking in the business curriculum’, Journal of Education for Business, Vol 79, No 4, pp 232–236.

Burke

L.A.

Moore

J.E.

(2003), ‘A perennial dilemma in OB education: Engaging the traditional student’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol 2, No 1, pp 37–52.

Capon

Kuhn

(2004), ‘What's so good about problem-based learning?’, Cognition and Instruction, Vol 22, No 1, pp 61–69.

Elshout-Mohr

Meijer

van Daalen-Kapteijns

Meeus

Tempelaar

D.T.

(2005), ‘Construction and validation of a questionnaire on metacognition’, manuscript submitted for publication.

Flavell

J.H.

(1979), ‘Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry’, American Psychologist, Vol 34, No 10, pp 906–911.

Gijselaers

W.H.

(1996), ‘Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No 68, pp 13–21.

Goossen

(2004), ‘Managers & MBAs: An interview with Henry Mintzberg’, Journal of Business Strategy, October, http://www.journalofbusinessstrategy.com/articles/index.shtml, retrieved 10 August 2005.

Halpern

D.F.

(1998), ‘Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring’, American Psychologist, Vol 53, No 4, pp 449–455.

10.

Hannon

McBride

Burns

(2004), ‘Developing creative and critical thinking abilities in business graduates: The value of experiential learning techniques’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 18, No 2, pp 95–100.

11.

Hinton

C.D.

(2005), Learning Sciences and Brain Research: Report of the Third Lifelong Learning Network Meeting, OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/58/34900796.pdf, retrieved 10 August 2005.

12.

Kuhn

Dean

Jr (2004), ‘Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice’, Theory into Practice, Vol 43, No 4, pp 268–273.

13.

Mintzberg

(2004), Managers, Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow.

14.

OECD (2004), Education at a Glance, OECD, Paris.

15.

Pascarella

(1997), ‘The secret of turning thinking into action’, Management Review, Vol 86, No 5, pp 38–39.

16.

Pintrich

P.R.

Wolters

C.A.

Baxter

G.P.

(2000), ‘Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning’, in Schraw

Impara

J.C.

, eds, Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln.

17.

Shraw

Dennison

R.S.

(1994), ‘Assessing metacognitive awareness’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol 19, No 4, pp 460–475.

18.

Van Hout-Wolters

B.H.A.M.

(2000), ‘Assessing active self-directed learning’, in Simons

R.-J.

van der Linden

Duffy

, eds, New Learning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 55–83.