The production of biomass for renewable energy supply has found wide acceptance among farmers in Germany. This paper examines the potential benefits of bioenergy for agricultural operations. Reasons for the successful implementation of biomass production in agriculture involve economic factors, the forms of public incentive tools, a compatibility with farmers' cultural patterns, and psychological aspects. In Germany, there are signs of considerable positive effects on the creation of employment and investment in rural areas. Still, the authors argue for a differentiated view of small- and large-scale bioenergy plants, and hypothesize that the former lead to a more comprehensive creation of added value in agriculture and rural areas than the latter. Competition for land and biomass is increasing, both between the bioenergy industry and other land users and within the bioenergy industry itself, especially between centralized and decentralized plants and between biogas and liquid biofuel uses. Due to the emergence of bioenergy, increasing linkages of agriculture with other economic and policy fields can be observed, especially with the energy industry and policy, with forestry, and with biodiversity and landscape conservation.
BartlettE. T.TaylorR. G.McKeanJ. R.HofJ. G. (1989), ‘Motivation of Colorado ranchers with federal grazing allotments’, Journal of Range Management, Vol 42, pp 454–457.
2.
BeckR. (1996), ‘Die Abschaffung der Wildnis. Landschaftsästhetik, bäuerliche Wirtschaft und Ökologie zu Beginn der Moderne’, in KonoldW., ed., Naturlandschaft – Kulturlandschaft. Die Veränderung der Landschaften nach der Nutzbarmachung durch den Menschen, Ecomed, Landsberg, pp 27–44.
3.
BensO.HüttlR. F. (2001), ‘Energetic utilisation of wood as biochemical energy carrier – a contribution to the utilisation of waste energy and land use’, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol 40, pp 344–351.
4.
BerndesG.HoogwijkM.van den BroekR. (2003), ‘The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: A review of 17 studies’, Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol 25, pp 1–28.
5.
BMU (2005), Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen – Nationale und internationale Entwicklung, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin.
6.
BungartR.BensO.HüttlR. F. (2000), ‘Production and bioenergy in post-mining landscapes in Lusatia. Perspectives and challenges for alternative landuse systems’, Ecological Engineering, Vol 16, pp S5–S16.
7.
BurtonR.WilsonG. A. (2006), ‘Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: Towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity?’Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 22, pp 95–115.
8.
DBV (2004), Situationsbericht 2005. Trends und Fakten zur Landwirtschaft, Deutscher Bauernverband, Bonn.
9.
DLR, ifeu, Wuppertal Institut (2004), Ökologisch optimierter Ausbau der Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien in Deutschland. FKZ 901 41 803, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin.
FaningerG. (2003), ‘Towards sustainable development in Austria: Renewable energy contributions’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol 8, pp 177–188.
HallD. (1997), ‘Biomass energy in industrialised countries – a view of the future’, Forest Ecology and Management, Vol 91, pp 17–45.
15.
HaselK. (2002), Forstgeschichte – ein Grundriss für Studium und Praxis, Kessel, Remagen.
16.
HillringB. (2002), ‘Rural development and bioenergy – experiences from 20 years of development in Sweden’, Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol 23, pp 443–451.
17.
HirschlB.HoffmannE.WetzigF. (2004), ‘Erneuerbare Energien versus Naturschutz? Einführung in das Schwerpunktthema’, Ökologisches Wirtschaften, Vol 5, pp 10–11.
18.
IlberyB.KneafseyM. (1998), ‘Product and place: Promoting quality products and services in the lagging rural regions of the European Union’, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 5, pp 329–341.
19.
JorgensenU.DalgaardT.KristensenE. (2005), ‘Biomass energy in organic farming – the potential role of short rotation coppice’, Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol 28, pp 237–248.
20.
Karpenstein-MachanM. (2001), ‘Sustainable cultivation concepts for domestic energy production from biomass’, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol 20, pp 1–14.
21.
KonitzkiB. (2005), Biomassenutzung in Brandenburg – eine Halbzeitbilanz zur Energiestrategie 2010, Brandenburgische Energie Technologie Initiative, Potsdam.
22.
KowatschA.FockT. (2004), ‘Landwirtschaft in strukturschwachen Regionen – Analyse und Handlungsansätze am Beispiel der Region Vorpommern’, Berichte über Landwirtschaft, Vol 80, pp 540–555.
23.
KromusS.WachterB.KoschuhW.MandlM.KrotscheckC.NarodoslwskyM. (2004), ‘The Green Biorefinery Austria – development of an integrated system for green biomass utilization’, Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, Vol 18, pp 7–12.
24.
LeibleL.KälberS. (2005), ‘Nachwachsende Rohstoffe in der Stromerzeugung – Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ökonomie und Umwelt’, GAIA, Vol 14, pp 253–261.
25.
LudleyH. (2002), ‘Einordnung von Biogasanlagen in den ländlichen Raum – Ein Beitrag zum nachhaltigen Wirtschaften’, Berichte über Landwirtschaft, Vol Supplement 215, pp 90–95.
26.
MantelK. (1990), Wald und Forst in der Geschichte, Schaper, Hannover.
27.
MontenyG.BanninkA.ChadwickD. (2006), ‘Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol 112, pp 163–170.
28.
PlieningerT. (2001), ‘Naturschutz auf privatem Land – Erfolg, Grenzen und Perspektiven anreizorientierter Strategien in den USA’, Landnutzung und Landentwicklung, Vol 42, pp 10–14.
29.
PlieningerT.BensO.HüttlR. F. (2006), ‘Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Bioenergie und Naturschutz’, in KonoldW.BöckerR.HampickeU., ed., Handbuch Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, chapter VII–2.2, supplement 18, Ecomed, Landsberg.
30.
RodeM. (2005), ‘Energetische Nutzung von Biomasse und der Naturschutz’, Natur und Landschaft, Vol 80, pp 403–412.
31.
SikorT. (2005), Public and Private in Resource Governance: Questions and Provocative Answers, Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
32.
SimsR. E. H. (2003), ‘Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol 8, pp 349–370.
33.
SonninoA. (1994), ‘Agricultural biomass production is an energy option for the future’, Renewable Energy, Vol 5, pp 857–865.
34.
UBA (2004), Hintergrundpapier: ‘Umweltschutz und Beschäftigung’, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
35.
WeiskeA.VabitschA.OlesenJ.ScheldeK.MichelJ.FriedrichR.KaltschmittM. (2006), ‘Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in European conventional and organic dairy farming’, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol 112, pp 221–232.
36.
WilsonG. A. (2001), ‘From productivism to post-productivism – and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol 26, pp 77–102.
