The agricultural sector in Europe faces a number of important challenges, such as developments in biotechnology and biofuel, globalization, vertical integration and policy changes. The important questions are whether and how farms are able to adapt to these changes and what are the potential forces working against adaptation. This paper elaborates on internal frictions regarding structural change in agriculture, namely sunk costs, dependence on subsidies and the challenges of an increasing demand for vertical integration.
BalmannA. (1999), ‘Path dependence and the structural development of family farm dominated regions’, IX European Congress of Agricultural Economists, Organized Session Papers, 24–28 August, Warsaw, pp 263–284.
2.
BalmannA.OdeningM.WeikardH.-P.BrandesW. (1996), ‘Path-dependence without increasing returns to scale and network externalities’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol 29, No 1, pp 159–172.
3.
BMVEL (2005), Agrarpolitischer Bericht der Bundesregierung, BMVEL, Bonn.
4.
BoehljeM. (1999), ‘Structural changes in the agricultural industries: How do we measure, analyze and understand them?’American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 81, No 5, pp 1028–1041.
5.
BreustedtG.GlaubenT. (2006), ‘Driving forces behind exiting from farming in western Europe’, mimeo.
6.
Deutscher Bauernverband (2005), ‘Situationsbericht 2006, Berlin’, Website: www.situationsbericht.de.
HaleyM. M. (2004), Market Integration in the North American Hog Industries, Agricultural Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
9.
HappeK. (2004), ‘Agricultural policies and farm structures – agent-based modelling and application to EU-policy reform’, Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, Vol 30, IAMO, Halle.
10.
HappeK.BalmannA.KellermannK. (2004), ‘An agent based analysis of different direct payment schemes for the German region Hohenlohe’, in Van HuylenbroeckG.VerbekeW.LauwersL., eds, Role of Institutions in Rural Policies and Agricultural Markets. Proceedings of the 80th EAAE Seminar: New Policies and Institutions for European Agriculture, 24–26 September 2003, Amsterdam, pp 171–182.
JohnsonG. L. (1956), ‘Supply functions: Some facts and notions’, in HeadyE. O., eds, Agricultural Adjustment Problems in a Growing Economy, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
13.
JohnsonG. L.QuanceL. (1972), The Overproduction Trap in U.S. Agriculture, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
14.
KeyN. (2004), ‘Agricultural contracting and scale of production’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Vol 33, No 2, pp 255–272.
15.
OECD (1993), Glossary of Industrial Organisation Economics and Competition Law, compiled by KhemaniR. S.ShapiroD. M., commissioned by the Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, OECD, Paris.
PoppeK. J. (2002), ‘A note on the need for micro economic household data in agriculture for international policy analysis’, Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, 12–13 April, Wye College, Ashford.
18.
SpillerA.TheuvsenL.ReckeG.SchulzeB. (2005), Sicherstellung der Wertschöpfung in der Schweineerzeugung: Perspektiven des Nordwestdeutschen Modells, Münster.
19.
SwinnenJ. F. M. (2005), ‘When the market comes to you – or not. The dynamics of vertical coordination in agri-food chains in transition’, Final Report of the World Bank (ECSSD) ESW on Dynamics of Vertical Coordination in ECA Agrifood Chains: Implications for Policy and Bank Operations (EW-P084034-ESW-BB), World Bank, Washington, DC.
20.
ThieleH.BrodersenC. M. (1999), ‘Differences in farm efficiency in market and transition economies: Empirical evidence from West and East Germany’, European Review of Agriculture Economics, Vol 26, No 3, pp 331–347.
