The degree of capacity utilization affects the measurement of total productivity. This paper uses establishment occupancy level as a proxy for establishment capacity utilization. Accordingly, the authors decompose total factor productivity (TFP) growth into technical progress, changes in allocative efficiency, changes in occupancy levels, changes in technical efficiency and scale effects. The empirical results show that the occupancy level component offers the most important contribution to TFP. Policy implications are offered in light of the results.
BatteseG.CoelliT. (1992), ‘Frontier production function, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol 3, pp 153–169.
2.
BauerP.W. (1988), ‘TFP growth, change in efficiency, and technological progress in the US airline industry: 1970 to 1981’, Working Paper No 8804, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH.
3.
BauerP. W. (1990), ‘Decomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, nonconstant returns to scale, and technical progress’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol 1, pp 287–299.
4.
BayarsaihanT.BatteseG.CoelliT. (1997), ‘Productivity of Mongolian grain farming, 1976–1989’, CEPA Working Paper, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Armidale.
5.
CoelliT. (1996), ‘A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation’, CEPA Working Paper, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Armidale.
6.
FecherF.PerelmanS. (1992), ‘Productivity growth and technical efficiency in OECD industrial activities’, in CavesR., ed, Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 459–488.
7.
Government of Galicia, Order 2nd June (1995), Tourism: Ordination of Rural Tourism Establishments, Galician Official Gazette, No 37, 22 February 1995.
8.
KalirajanK.ObwomaM.ZhaoS. (1996), ‘A decomposition of total factor productivity growth: The case of Chinese agricultural growth before and after reform’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 78, pp 331–338.
9.
KimS.HanG. (2001), ‘A decomposition of total factor productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industries: A stochastic frontier approach’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol 16, pp 269–281.
10.
KumbhakarS.C. (2000), ‘Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: A panel data approach’, Econometric Reviews, Vol 19, pp 425–460.
11.
KumbhakarS.C.LovellC.A.K. (2000), Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12.
MartínezF. (2003), Rural Tourism: Characteristics and Economic Influence in Galicia, PhD thesis, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela.
13.
MartínezF.RodríguezX.A. (2006), ‘Rural tourism demand in Galicia, Spain’, Tourism Economics, Vol 12, No 1, pp 21–31.
14.
MorrisonC. (1985), ‘Primal and dual measures of economic capacity utilization: An application to productivity measurement in the US automobile industry’, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, Vol 4, pp 312–324.
15.
NishimizuM.PageJ.M. (1982), ‘Total factor productivity growth, technical progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965–78’, The Economic Journal, Vol 92, pp 929–936.
16.
Tourist Research Institute (2002a), Occupancy in Rural Tourism Establishments (DATATUR), Secretariat of State of Commerce and Tourism, Madrid.
17.
Tourist Research Institute (2002b), Spanish Tourism During the Year 2001: Touristic Movements of Spaniards (FAMILITUR), Secretariat of State of Commerce and Tourism, Madrid.
18.
Xunta of Galicia (1995), Tourism: Regulation of Rural Tourism Establishments, Official Journal, Autonomous Government of Galicia (DOG 22 February 1995, No 37).
