This paper examines the effect that entrepreneurial and technological identities have on women's participation in technology entrepreneurship. The research is based on a project looking at the low level of women's participation in technology entrepreneurship in the north-west of England. It examines the barriers that women face in setting up a technology business, and finds that the way in which these identities are constructed are male, restricting women's access to technology enterprise, through services and motivation.
AhlH. (2004), The Scientific Reproduction of Gender Inequality: A Discourse Analysis of Research Texts on Women's Entrepreneurship, Liber AB, Stockholm.
2.
BruniA.GherardiS.PoggioB. (2005), Gender and Entrepreneurship: An Ethnographical Approach, Routledge, London.
3.
BrushC. G. (1997), ‘Women-owned businesses: Obstacles and opportunities’, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol 2, No 1, pp 1–24.
ChellE.BainesS. (1998), ‘Does gender affect business “performance”? A study of microbusinesses in business services in the UK’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol 10, pp 117–135.
6.
CohenL.MussonG. (2000), ‘Entrepreneurial identities: Reflections from two case studies’, Organization, Vol 7, No 1, pp 31–48.
DTI (2004), Creating Wealth from Knowledge: The DTI Five Year Programme, DTI, London.
9.
DumasC. (1992), ‘Integrating the daughter into family business management’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 16, No 4, pp 41–55.
10.
EOC (2002), Women and Men in Britain: Management, EOC, Manchester.
11.
EOC (2003), Women and Men in Britain: Pay and Income, EOC, Manchester.
12.
FagensonE. (1993), ‘Personal value systems of men and women: Entrepreneurs versus managers’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 8, No 5, pp 409–430.
13.
FieldenS. L.DaweA. (2004), ‘Entrepreneurship and social inclusion’, Women In Management Review, Vol 19, No 3.
14.
FieldingJ.GloverJ. (1999), ‘Women science graduates in Britain; the value of secondary analysis of large scale datasets’, Work, Employment and Society, Vol 13, No 2, pp 353–367.
15.
HeilbrunnS. (2004), ‘Impact of gender on difficulties faced by entrepreneurs’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 5, No 3, pp 159–165.
16.
HMSO (2002), Working in Britain 2000, HMSO, London.
17.
KourilskyM. L.WalstadW. B. (1998), ‘Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 13, No 1, pp 77–88.
18.
LewisP.LlewellynN. (2004), ‘Special issue: Enterprise and entrepreneurial identity issue: Introduction’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 5, No 1, pp 5–8.
19.
LongstrethM.StaffordK.MauldinT. (1987), ‘Self-employed women and their families: Time use and socio-economic characteristics’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 25, No 3, pp 30–37.
20.
MarlowS. (1997), ‘Self-employed women – new opportunities, old challenges’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol 9, No 3, pp 199–210.
21.
MatthewsC. H.MoserS. B. (1995), ‘A longitudinal investigation of the impact of family background and gender on interest in small business ownership’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 34, No 2, pp 29–43.
22.
ONS (2000), Labour Force Survey, ONS, London.
23.
ReedK. (2001), Managing Our Margins: Women Entrepreneurs in Suburbia, Routledge, New York.
24.
Small Business Service (2003), A Strategic Framework for Women's Enterprise, SBS, DTI, London.
25.
WarrenL. (2004), ‘Negotiating entrepreneurial identity: Communities of practice and changing discourses’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 5, No 1, pp 25–35.
