Analysis of data from a survey of independent inventors showed that part-time and full-time inventors were similar in terms of age, gender, educational level and the types of inventions they pursued. However, sales levels achieved were significantly related to the combination of a full-time commitment to inventing and a willingness to invest in patent protection. Further interviews of successful inventors indicated that the transition from part-time to full-time inventing was driven by either unexpected events, a desire to change careers, or preference for working in a more creative atmosphere. The interviewees showed optimism for the future of independent inventors, who they believed would benefit from the creativity encouraged by unstructured environments. They were also optimistic about a broader customer base due to global expansion of market-based economies, and increased distribution opportunities.
AndersonH. (2004), ‘Why big companies can't invent’, Technology Review, Vol 107, No 4, pp 56–59.
2.
AndrewsE. L. (1992), ‘Inventor offers advice on ways to market ideas’, The Journal Record, 9 May.
3.
AstebroT. (1998), ‘Basic statistics on the success rate and profits for individual inventors’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 23, No 2, pp 41–49.
4.
AstebroT. (2003), ‘The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving’, The Economic Journal, Vol 113, pp 226–239.
5.
BakosT.NowotarskiM. (2003), ‘Independent inventors get Lion's share of insurance industry patents’, National Underwriter, Vol 107, No 42, p 23.
6.
BaumolW. J. (2004), ‘Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free market growth machine’, Small Business Economics, Vol 23, pp 9–21.
7.
BrownK. A. (1988), Inventors at Work: Interviews with 16 Notable American Inventors, Tempus Books, Microsoft Press, Redland, WA.
8.
BylinskyG. (1996), ‘Inventors are reinventing themselves’, Fortune, Vol 133, No 5, p 78A.
9.
DagenaisD. L.Seguin-DeludeL.DesranleauC. (1991), ‘Analysis of individual Canadian inventor behavior’, Technovation, Vol 11, No 6, pp 357–372.
10.
DahlinK.TaylorM.FichmanM. (2000), ‘Differences in inventive content between independent inventors and corporate inventors’, Rotman Working Paper Series 2000–07, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
11.
EmshwillerJ. R. (1991), ‘The new inventors: Independent inventors find frustration in selling ideas’, Wall Street Journal, 21 August, p B.2.
12.
FloridaR. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class, Basic Books, New York.
13.
FriedmanT. L. (2005), The World is Flat, Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.
14.
GalbraithJ. K. (1952), American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
15.
HisrichR. D. (1985), ‘The inventor: A potential source for new products’, The Mid Atlantic Journal of Business, Vol 24, No 1, pp 67–80.
16.
KhanB. Z.SokoloffK. L. (1992), Schemes of Practical Utility: Entrepreneurship and Innovation among the Great Inventors in the United States, 1790–1865, NBER Working Paper Series, Historical Paper No 42, Cambridge, MA.
17.
KleinE. (1989), ‘Making innovation pay’, D & B Reports, Vol 37, No 1, p 18.
18.
MacDonaldS. (1986), ‘The distinctive research of the individual inventor’, Research Policy, Vol 15, pp 199–210.
19.
MunschK. (2004), ‘Outsourcing design and innovation’, Research Technology Management, Vol 47, No 1, p 27–30.
20.
NeffJ. (2004), Advertising Age, Vol 75, No 36, pp 3–4.
21.
ParkerR. S.UdellG. G.BladesL. (1996), ‘The new independent inventors: Implications for corporate policy’, Review of Business, Vol 17, No 3, pp 7–13.
22.
PelletJ. (2002), ‘Inventors for hire’, Chief Executive, March, p 9.
23.
QuinnJ. B. (2000), ‘Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth’, Sloan Management Review, Vol 41, No 4, pp 13–28.
24.
RichardsB. (2002), ‘Light bulb moments: More inventors are finding that creative juices begin flowing later in life’, Wall Street Journal, 30 September, p R7.
25.
RigbyD.ZookC. (2002), ‘Open-market innovation’, Harvard Business Review, October, pp 80–89.
26.
RuttanV. W. (2001), Technology, Growth and Development, Oxford University Press, New York, p 83.
27.
SchmooklerJ. (1957), ‘Inventors past and present’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 39, No 3, pp 321–333.
28.
SchulmanM. (1992), ‘Industry consolidation, economic slowdown put premium on outside inventors’, Playthings, 1 November, p 30.
29.
SchwartzE. I. (2004a), Juice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
30.
SchwartzE. I. (2004b), ‘Sparking the fire of invention’, Technology Review, Vol 104, No 4, pp 32–40.
31.
SirilliG. (1987), ‘Patents and inventors: An empirical study’, Research Policy, Vol 16, pp 157–174.
32.
UdellL. J. (2004), ‘Betting the farm: Inventors who love too much’, Inventors' Digest, July/August, pp 33–34.
33.
WeickC. W. (2003), ‘A university-based model for evaluating inventions’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 4, No 4, pp 225–235.
34.
WeickC. W.EakinC. F. (2005), ‘Independent inventors and innovation: An empirical study’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 6, No 1, pp 5–15.
35.
WhalleyP. (1991), ‘The social practice of independent inventing’, Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol 16, No 2, pp 208–232.
36.
WrightL. T.NancarrowC. (2001), ‘Improving marketing communication and innovation strategies in the small business context’, Small Business Economics, Vol 16, No 2, p 113.
