There is apprehension that the decoupling of EU income support will result in shortages of livestock for preservation of biodiversity in Swedish semi-natural pastures. However, in a region studied in British Columbia with natural conditions similar to those in central Sweden but with no income support, one-third of the agricultural land is semi-natural pastures and the number of beef cattle has increased. This can be explained by the availability of cheap outdoor wintering of cattle and low opportunity cost of land. The results suggest that the abolition of income support and the tradition of expensive indoor wintering, but maintained environmental allowance for grazing, would result in land use in large parts of Sweden similar to that in the British Columbia region.
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development (1998), Cow-Calf (Weaned Calf) Enterprises & Forage Enterprises, British Columbia 1996 Production Year, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton.
2.
BinswangerH. P.RuttanV. W. (1978), Induced Innovation – Technology, Institutions and Development, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
3.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1996), ‘Planning for profit, barley on stubble, Peace River, fall 1996’, Website: www.agf.gov.bc.ca/busmgmt/budgets/.
4.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1998a), ‘Planning for profit, wheat on fallow, Peace River, spring 1998’, Website: www.agf.gov.bc.ca/busmgmt/budgets.
5.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1998b), ‘Planning for profit, 135 head of cow-calf ranch, Peace River area, fall 1998’, Website: www.agf.gov.bc.ca/busmgmt/budgets/.
6.
DrakeL. (1992), ‘The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol 19, pp 351–364.
7.
Ds (2004), Förslag till riktlinjer för implementering i Sverige av EU:s beslut 2003 om en jordbruksreform, Jordbruksdepartimentet, Stockholm, p 9.
8.
EkstamU., and ForshedeN. (2000), Svenska naturbetesmarker – historia och ekologi, Naturvårdsverkets förlag, Stockholm.
9.
ElbaumB. (1990), ‘Cumulative or comparative advantage? Competitiveness in the early 20th century’, World Development, Vol 18, pp 1255–1272.
10.
EmanuelssonU.BergÅ.SvenssonR., and PehrsonI. (2001), ‘Management of seminatural grasslands – economy and biodiversity’MISTRA Programme Plan, Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Uppsala.
ErikssonO.CousinsS. A. O., and BruunH. H. (2002), ‘Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia’, Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol 13, pp 743–748.
13.
FoxD. G.SniffenC. J., and O'ConnorJ. D. (1988), ‘Adjusting nutrient requirements of beef cattle for animal and environmental variations’, Journal of Animal Science, Vol 66, pp 1475–1495.
14.
HayamiY., and RuttanV. W. (1971), Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
15.
HeckscherE. F. (1919), ‘The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income’, article published in Swedish, and reprinted in Readings in the Theory of International Trade, 1949, Handelshögskolan, Stockholm.
16.
JensenH. G., and FrandsenS. E. (2003), Impact of the Eastern European Accession and the 2003-Reform of the CAP, Consequences for Individual Member Countries, Working Paper 11/03, Danish Research Institute of Food Economics, Copenhagen.
17.
Jordbruksverket (2002), Marknadsöversikt – animalier, Rapport 2002:13, Jordbruksverket, Jönköping.
18.
Jordbruksverket (2003), Statens jordbruksverks föreskrifter SJVFS 2003:6 om djurhållning inom jordbruket mm, L100, Jordbruksverket, Jönköping.
19.
KeayR. (1998), Material for a workshop for ranchers in the Peace, and personal communication, British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Kamloops, BC.
20.
KiviniemiK. (1997), ‘A study of seed dispersal and recruitment of plants in a fragmented habitat’Växtekologi, Vol 3, Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.
21.
KummK.-I. (1989), Skog på jordbruksmark, Jordbrukstekniska Institutet, JTI-rapport 105, Swedish Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Uppsala.
22.
KummK.-I. (2002), Hållbar nöt- och lammköttsproduktion – en idéskiss, Rapport MAT 21 nr 2/2002, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala.
MattsonR. (1985), Jordbrukets utveckling i Sverige, Aktuellt från lantbruksuniversitetet nr 344, Uppsala.
26.
National Board of Forestry (2003), The Forestry Act, National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Website: www.svo.se/eng/englaw.htm.
27.
Naturvårdsverket (1997), Det framtida jordbruket, Rapport 4755, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm.
28.
NorrmanE. (1981), Svenskarna och deras husdjur, LT:s förlag, Stockholm.
29.
OhlinB. (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Harvard Economic Series, VHarvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30.
OlssonM. (1991), Svensk mjölk- och nötköttsproduktion i ett europeiskt perspektiv, Rapport 40, Institutionen för ekonomi, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala.
31.
Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Statistical Service Unit (1997), Census of Agriculture Statistics, Regional Districts of British Columbia 1991 & 1996, Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Statistical Service Unit, Kamloops, BC.
32.
Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Statistical Service Unit (2002), Census of Agriculture Statistics, Regional Districts of British Columbia 1986, 1991, 1996 & 2001, Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Statistical Service Unit, Kamloops, BC.
