Business incubators play a critical role in economic regeneration through the development and support of new and sustainable enterprises. Many UK incubator projects are funded by the European Commission through the higher education sector. This study compares and contrasts six business incubation case studies and identifies significant criteria for successful operation and ongoing sustainability. A conceptual framework for a ‘ladder’ of business incubation, supporting new businesses through start-up and growth, is proposed as a guide to good practice. The findings clearly identify the need for key partnerships with public-sector and private-sector stakeholders to ensure incubator longevity.
AlbertP.GaynorL. (2003), ‘National contexts, incubator families and trends in incubation – views from four countries’, paper presented at 48th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business, Belfast, 15–18 June.
2.
AllenD. N.McCluskeyR. (1990), ‘Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol 14, pp 61–77.
3.
Barclays Bank plc (2005), ‘UK start-ups reach new peak thanks to boom in traditional trades’, 21 March 2005, www.business.barclays.co.uk.
4.
BarrowC. (2001), Incubators: A Realist's Guide to the World's New Business Accelerators, Wiley, Chichester, p 9.
5.
BoocockG.AndersonV. (2003), ‘International business and UK SMEs: Rationale, routes, readiness, role of government support, and reflections’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 4, No 2, pp 97–111.
6.
BrooksbankD.Jones-EvansD. (2004), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2004 Wales Executive Report, National Entrepreneurship Observatory, Welsh Development Agency, Cardiff.
7.
BrooksbankD.ThomasB. (2001), ‘An assessment of higher education spin-off enterprises in Wales’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 15, No 6, pp 415–420.
8.
CliftonN.C. (2000), The Future of the SME: Can Wales sustain an Enterprise Culture?, WEI Working Paper 5, Wales Enterprise Institute (WEI), University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, p 3.
9.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2002), Research Methods in Education, 5th edition, Routledge Falmer, London.
10.
CSES (2002), Benchmarking of Business Incubators, Final Report, Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services, Enterprise Directorate-General, European Commission, Brussels.
11.
CurranJ.BlackburnR.A. (1999), ‘A critical examination of the proposed new Small Business Service and response to the DTI consultation paper’, ISBA Small Firms Policy Forum, Leeds, 11 October.
12.
CurranJ.BlackburnR.A. (2001), Researching the Small Enterprise, Sage, London.
13.
DruckerP.F. (1985), ‘The discipline of innovation, the innovative enterprise’, in Best of Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA, 2002, pp 5, 9.
14.
DTI (2004), Statistical Press Release URN 04/402, 22 December, Department of Trade and Industry, London, www.sbs.gov.uk.
15.
DuffA. (2000), Best Practice in Incubator Management, AUSTEP Strategic Partnering, Booragoon, pp 9, 11, Appendix C.
16.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989), ‘Building theories from case study research’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 14, No 4, pp 532–550.
17.
EriksonT.GjellanA. (2003), ‘Training programmes as incubators’, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol 27, No 1, pp 36–40.
18.
EtzkowitzH. (2003), ‘Innovation in industry: The Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Social Science Information, Vol 42, pp 293–337.
19.
Europa (2003), ‘Commission adopts a new definition of micro, small and medium sized enterprises in Europe’, IP/03/652, 8 May, European Commission, Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start.
20.
FloudR. (2001) ‘Delivering the third mission – does one size fit all?’, keynote address to conference of the Higher Education Regional Development Association for the South West, 15–16 November 2001.
21.
GonzalezM.LuceaR. (2001), The Evolution of Business Incubation, Regional Technology Working Paper Series, Center for Economic Development, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, p 1.
22.
GonzalezM.LuceaR. (2000), The State of the Incubator Industry in the Pittsburgh Region, Regional Technology Working Paper Series, Center for Economic Development, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
HackettS.M.DiltsD.M. (2004), ‘A real options-driven theory of business incubation’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 29, pp 83–91.
25.
HagueD.OakleyK. (2000), Spin-offs and Start-ups in UK Universities, CVCP, London.
26.
HamelG.PrahaladC.K. (1996), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
27.
HannonP.D. (2004), How do You Want to Grow Your Firms – Natural Development or Battery Farmed? A Reflection on the Discourse of Incubation, Welsh Enterprise Monograph No 5, University of Glamorgan Business School, Pontypridd, pp 79–109.
28.
HarmanP.ReadL. (2003), ‘Supporting incubation in the UK through the development of benchmarks’, paper presented at 48th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business, Belfast, 15–18 June.
29.
HEFCW (2001), National Assembly's Review of Higher Education: Welsh Funding Council's Evidence, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Cardiff.
30.
HickmanC.RaiaC. (2002), ‘Incubating innovation’, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol 23, No 3, pp 14–18.
31.
HisrichR.D.DrnovsekM. (2002), ‘Entrepreneurship and small business research – a European perspective’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol 9, No 2, pp 172–222.
32.
EC Innovation Directorate (2003), ‘Innovation governance: What's the Welsh for innovation?’, IRE Network News, Innovation & Technology Transfer, September.
33.
JonesP.Beynon-DaviesP.MuirE. (2003), ‘eBusiness barriers to growth within the SME sector’, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol 7, No 1, pp 1–25.
KennedyR. M.ScholtesP.SonessonC. (1999), Working Paper No 1: Case Study on the Operation of Three Romanian Business Centres, PSD Technical Working Papers Series, Supporting Private Industry, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
36.
KmetzJ.L. (2000), ‘Business incubators for Central and Eastern Europe’, Department of Business Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, www.buec.udel.edu/kmetzj/incubators.
37.
LalkakaR. (1997), Lessons from International Experience for the Promotion of Business Incubation Systems in Emerging Economies, Small and Medium Industries Branch, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
38.
LalkakaR. (2001), ‘“Best Practices” in business incubation lessons (yet to be) learned’, paper presented at the International Conference on Business Centres: Actors for Economic and Social Development, Brussels, 14–15 November.
39.
LambertR. (2003), Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration: Final Report, HMS Treasury, London.
40.
LendnerC. (2003), ‘Management, professionals and funding of university business incubators worldwide’, paper presented at 48th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business, Belfast, 15–18 June.
41.
LichtensteinG.A.LyonsT.S. (2001), ‘The entrepreneurial development system: Transforming business talent and community economies’, Economic Development Quarterly, Vol 15, No 1, p 3–20.
42.
MalanJ. (2001), ‘Belgium Conference Press Release: Critical success factors in business incubation — contribution from Jack Malan’, Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services, Enterprise Directorate-General, European Commission, Brussels.
43.
MeierC., (2001), ‘Networking and knowledge management for incubators’, interview by Alan McCluskey, 17 August, Connected Magazine, www.connected.org/media/meier.
44.
NBIA (2005), Resource Center, National Business Incubation Association, www.nbia.org.
45.
PetersL.RiceM.SundararajanM. (2004), ‘The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 29, pp 83–91.
46.
PottsG. (2002), ‘Regional policy and the “regionalization” of the university–industry links: A view from the English regions’, European Planning Studies, Vol 10, No 8, Carfax, London.
47.
ReynoldsP.StoreyD.J.WestheadP. (1994), ‘Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation’, Regional Studies, Vol 28, pp 443–456.
48.
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2000), Research Methods for Business Students, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow.
49.
SBS (2001), 2001/04 Strategy: Making the UK the Best Place in the World to Start and Grow a Business, Small Business Service, Department of Trade and Industry, London, pp 3, 13.
50.
SmithF. (2001), ‘Technology business incubation: A role for universities’, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, ATSE Focus, No 115.
51.
StoreyD.J. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London.
52.
ThomasB.GornallL.AngoveM.VoiseyP. (2003), ‘The development of incubation in Wales: A policy research study’ paper presented at the 26th ISBA National Small Firms Conference, Southampton, 25–26 November.
UKBI (2003), Benchmarking Framework for Business Incubation: Final Report, United Kingdom Business Incubation, Birmingham.
55.
UKBI (2004), ‘Universities mean business’, United Kingdom Business Incubation, Birmingham, www.ukbi.co.uk.
56.
VickerstaffS.ParkerK. (1994), ‘Helping small firms: The contribution of TECs and LECs’, International Small Business Journal, Vol 13, No 4, pp 56–72.
57.
WAG (2003), Wales for Innovation: The Welsh Assembly Government's Action Plan for Innovation, Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff.
58.
WAG (2004), Knowledge Economy Nexus: Role of Higher Education in Wales, Report of Higher Education and Economic Development Task and Finish Group of the Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff.
59.
Western Mail (2005), ‘Both sexes need support to develop businesses’, Western Mail, Business Section, 20 July, p 9.
60.
WolfeW.AdkinsD.ShermanH. (2000), Practices in Business Incubation, National Business Incubation Association, Birmingham.
61.
YinR. K., (1994), Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edition, Sage, London, pp 1, 6, 7, 13, 14, 19, 42, 45, 55, 100.
62.
YushufA.SchindelhutteM. (2000), ‘Exploiting enterprise in a declining economy’, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol 5, No 1, pp 41–56.
