Technologies developed at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, are disseminated via a network of external technology transfer officers. Each of CERN's 20 member states has appointed at least one technology transfer officer to help establish links with CERN. This network has been in place since 2001 and early experiences indicate that the transfer processes could be improved. This paper investigates current technology transfer activities between CERN and its member states in the context of key requirements for successful transfer projects as identified in the literature. The analysis suggests that the integration of regional embedded ‘anchor organizations’, such as universities and their technology transfer offices, could overcome some of the bottlenecks that currently inhibit greater technology transfer activities between CERN and firms in its member states. The paper closes with a qualitative case study of the transfer office at Graz University of Technology.
AsheimB. T.IsaksenA. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 27, pp 77–86.
2.
AutioE.Bianchi-StreitM.HameriA. P., eds (2003), Technology Transfer and Technological Learning Through CERN's Procurement Activity, CERN, Geneva.
3.
BlumeL.FrommO. (2000), ‘Wissenstransfer zwischen Universitäten und regionaler Wirtschaft: Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel’, Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, pp 109–123.
4.
BozemannB. (2000) ‘Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory’, Research Policy, Vol 29, pp 627–655.
5.
DachsB.EbersbergerB.PykaA. (2004), Why do Firms Co-operate for Innovation? A Comparison of Austrian and Finnish CIS 3 Results, Beitrag Nr 255, Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe des Instituts für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Augsburg.
6.
De JuanV. (2003), ‘Comparative study of technology transfer practices in Europe and the USA’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 17, No 5, pp 337–349.
7.
HähnleM., ed (1997), R&D Collaborations between CERN and Industrial Companies: Organisational and Spatial Aspects, doctoral thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna.
8.
HamblinD.WillcockJ. (1999), ‘Assessing the likely effectiveness of intervention programmes in small manufacturing companies’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 13, No 5, pp 349–355.
9.
HoferF. (2005), ‘Knowledge transfer between academia and industry’, in SchwartzDavid, ed, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, Idea Group Inc, Hershey, PA.
10.
HoferF.AdametzC.HolzerF. (2004), ‘Technology and knowledge transfer in the Graz region: Ten years of experience’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 18, No 3, pp 177–186.
11.
KallingT. (2003), ‘Organization – internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: A qualitative case study’, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol 10, pp 115–126.
12.
KremicT. (2003), ‘Technology transfer: A contextual approach’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 28, pp 149–158.
13.
LambertR., ed (2003), Lambert Review of Business–University Collaboration: Final Report, HM Treasury, London.
14.
LargeD.BelinkoK.KalligatsiK. (2000), ‘Building successful technology commercialization teams: Pilot empirical support for the theory of cascading commitment’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 25, pp 169–180.
15.
Li-HuaR. (2001), ‘From technology transfer to knowledge transfer’, paper presented at 12th International Conference on Management of Technology, IAMOT2003, Nancy, 13–15 May.
16.
LipscombM.McEwanA. M. (2001), ‘The TCS model: An effective method of technology transfer at Kingston University, UK’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 15, No 6, pp 393–401.
17.
LunaM.VelascoJ. L. (2003), ‘Bridging the gap between firms and academic institutions: The role of “translators”’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 17, No 5, pp 313–323.
18.
LundvallB. A.JohnsonB.AndersenE. S.DalumB. (2002), ‘National systems of production, innovation and competence building’, Research Policy, Vol 31, pp 213–231.
19.
MacPhersonA. D. (1997), ‘The role of external technical support in the innovation performance of scientific instruments firms: Empirical evidence from New York State’, Technovation, Vol 17, pp 141–151.
20.
MastenJ.HartmannG. B.SafariA. (1995), ‘Small business strategic planning and technology transfer: The use of publicly supported technology assistance agencies’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol 33, pp 26–33.
21.
McCulloughJ. M. (2003), ‘Technology transfer: Creating the right environment’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 17, pp 111–117.
22.
NicolayR.WimmersS., eds (2000), Kundenzufriedenheit der Unternehmen mit Forschungseinrichtungen: Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung zur Zusammenarbeit zwischen Unternehmen und Forschungseinrichtungen, Deutscher Industrie- und Handelstag, Berlin.
23.
NordbergM.VerbekeA., eds (1999), The Strategic Management of High Technology Contracts: The Case of CERN, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
24.
OughtonC.LandabasoM.MorganK. (2002), ‘The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 27, pp 97–110.
25.
SackettP. J. (2000), ‘Towards concurrent processes technology transfer’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 14, No 5, pp 288–296.
26.
SchartingerD.SchibanyA.GasslerH. (2001), ‘Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, pp 255–268.
27.
SchmochU.LichtG.ReinhardM., eds (2000), Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart.
28.
SchreinerM.FahrniF., eds (2001), Partnering for Success: Creating Win–Win Constellations for Long-Term Industry–Academia Collaboration, Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences, Zurich.
StarbuckE. (2001), ‘Optimizing university research collaborations’, Research Technology Management, Vol 44, pp 40–44.
31.
TödtlingF.KaufmannA. (2002), ‘SMEs in regional innovation systems and the role of innovation support – the case of Upper Austria’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 27, pp 15–26.
32.
Van Egmond-de Wilde de LignyE. L. C.KumaraswamyM. M. (2003), ‘Determining the success of failure of international technology transfer: A conceptual framework’, Industry & Higher Education, Vol 17, No 1, pp 51–57.
