Measuring the Impact of University Technology Transfer

Abstract

This paper discusses measures that capture the impact of university technology transfer activities on a university's local and regional economies (economic impact). Such assessments are of increasing interest to policy makers, researchers and technology transfer professionals, yet there have been few published discussions of the merits of various measures. The bottom line is that no single measure can capture the many aspects of technology transfer; rather, any assessment of the impact of technology transfer on local and regional economies must be discussed with regard to several measures. The authors offer two constructs for assessing the impact of university technology transfer on local and regional economies: direct versus indirect impacts and benchmarking analysis against a proper counterfactual. They also discuss, as an example, a project at the University of California that aims to develop an information infrastructure which can be used in the future to provide data to support the types of assessments discussed in the paper.

Keywords

technology transfer research commercialization economic impact impact assessment StartUpView University of California

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Henderson

Jaffe

Trajtenberg

, ‘Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988’, Review of Economic Statistics, Vol 80, pp 119–127.

Jensen

Thursby

(2001), ‘Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions’, American Economic Review, Vol 91, pp 240–259.

Kramer

Scheibe

Reavis

Berneman

(1997), ‘Induced investments and jobs produced by exclusive patent licenses—a confirmatory study,’ Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, Vol 9, pp 79–99.

Link

A. N.

(1999), ‘A suggested method for assessing the economic impacts of university R&D: Including identifying roles for technology transfer officers’, Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, Vol 11, pp 67–91.

Lowe

R. A.

(2001), ‘The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions,’ in Libecap

, ed, Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes, JAI Press, Amsterdam.

Lowe

R. A.

(2002), ‘Invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of university research by inventor-founded firms’, PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Pressman

L. S.

Guterman

S. K.

Abrams

Geist

D.E.

Nelson

L.L.

(1995), ‘Preproduction investment and jobs induced by MIT exclusive patent licenses: A preliminary model to measure the economic impact of university licensing’, Journal of the Association of University Technology Licensing Managers, Vol 7, pp 49–82.

Rosenberg

Nelson

R. R.

(1994), ‘American universities and technical advance in industry’, Research Policy, Vol 23, pp 323–348.

Stevens

(1997), ‘Assessing the economic impact of technology transfer activities – the state of the art’, paper presented at Ohio State University conference.

10.

Stevens

(2003), ‘20 years of academic licensing? Royalty income and economic impact’, Les Nouvelles, Vol 38, pp 133–140.

11.

UC Irvine (2003), Start-Up Companies Founded on UCI Technologies 1987–2002, University of California Irvine Office of Technology Alliances, Irvine, CA.

12.

Zucker

Darby

Armstrong

(1998a), ‘Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets?’, Economic Inquiry, Vol 36, pp 65–86.

13.

Zucker

Darby

Brewer

(1998b), ‘Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises’, American Economic Review, Vol 88, pp 290–306.